SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Fauteuil - DG

Moves before the start of the season

Created by: Korax
Team: 2022-23 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 19, 2022
Published: Aug. 22, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
3$925,000
3$925,000
3$925,000
3$925,000
3$925,000
3$925,000
2$925,000
3$925,000
2$925,000
2$925,000
3$925,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$950,000
2$2,500,000
Trades
1.
2.
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
2024
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the EDM
2025
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$76,006,666$1,132,500$4,852,500$6,493,334
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,875,000$7,875,000
C
UFA - 8
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
RW, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,500,000$2,500,000
C, RW
RFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$6,375,000$6,375,000
C, LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,700,000$1,700,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,400,000$3,400,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$875,000$875,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,875,000$2,875,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,875,000$4,875,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$762,500$762,500
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$420,000$420K)
LD/RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$10,500,000$10,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$859,167$859,167 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$830,000$830,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$838,333$838,333 ($0$0$0$0)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 22, 2022 at 11:57 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,580
Likes: 9,204
Seriously, you trade for a guy you make top pairing and think that Dvorak and a b prospect gets the job done but COL is going to send a pick as well. 🤪🤣😂. That’s a no
yycofred and TJTwolf liked this.
Aug. 22, 2022 at 12:01 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 903
Calgary isn't doing that. No need to hitch on another year of a bad deal when they can be done with Lucic at the end of this season.
Aug. 22, 2022 at 12:14 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Be Constructive
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 885
Likes: 116
Quoting: Xqb15a
Seriously, you trade for a guy you make top pairing and think that Dvorak and a b prospect gets the job done but COL is going to send a pick as well. 🤪🤣😂. That’s a no


Yeah sure, and the Lekhonen trade was awful until you won the cup and start saying Barron isn't as good as a prospect after all hahaha

It's good value for a trade that will reinforce your 2nd line, get you rid of a Dman that is often injured and you get a B prospect that gives you offensive upsides.

Okay maybe the 2nd should be conditionnal, I'll give you that
Aug. 22, 2022 at 12:17 p.m.
#4
redhairedguy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 10
Likes: 1
Kirby Dach wants you as a GM that's for sure
Aug. 22, 2022 at 12:49 p.m.
#5
Representing the 505
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,516
Likes: 3,705
Quoting: Korax
Yeah sure, and the Lekhonen trade was awful until you won the cup and start saying Barron isn't as good as a prospect after all hahaha

It's good value for a trade that will reinforce your 2nd line, get you rid of a Dman that is often injured and you get a B prospect that gives you offensive upsides.

Okay maybe the 2nd should be conditionnal, I'll give you that


Girard is not "often injured" - he's been dinged up a few times but that describes most players at various points. Girard has played 340 games since 2017-2018 while Devo has played 358 games since 2016-2017. Devo literally missed 5 months of the 2018-2019 season to an injury; he only played 56 games last season while Girard has never played fewer than 67 in a full season. Who is the more injured player between the two?

And the Avs aren't exactly desperate for a 2C at this point no matter how much people want that to be the case; they have internal options that they can try before they go burning assets. It makes little sense for them to trade a young, cost-controlled, top-4 D for a borderline 2C/3C that has three years left. I like Devo - he's better than JTC but he isn't exactly an established 2C. This is just not a realistic trade.
TJTwolf liked this.
Aug. 22, 2022 at 1:15 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 254
Likes: 115
Quoting: NMAvsFan
Girard is not "often injured" - he's been dinged up a few times but that describes most players at various points. Girard has played 340 games since 2017-2018 while Devo has played 358 games since 2016-2017. Devo literally missed 5 months of the 2018-2019 season to an injury; he only played 56 games last season while Girard has never played fewer than 67 in a full season. Who is the more injured player between the two?

And the Avs aren't exactly desperate for a 2C at this point no matter how much people want that to be the case; they have internal options that they can try before they go burning assets. It makes little sense for them to trade a young, cost-controlled, top-4 D for a borderline 2C/3C that has three years left. I like Devo - he's better than JTC but he isn't exactly an established 2C. This is just not a realistic trade.


The only realistic option I think Girard should be traded for would be Sam Bennett. And at this point, I think that'd even be dumb. Newhook is going to be a straight killer. You'll be good.
NMAvsFan liked this.
Aug. 22, 2022 at 2:23 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,580
Likes: 9,204
Quoting: Korax
Yeah sure, and the Lekhonen trade was awful until you won the cup and start saying Barron isn't as good as a prospect after all hahaha

It's good value for a trade that will reinforce your 2nd line, get you rid of a Dman that is often injured and you get a B prospect that gives you offensive upsides.

Okay maybe the 2nd should be conditionnal, I'll give you that

It absolutely Is not.
TJTwolf liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll