Dunn has taken a giant leap forward on a team that's been on fire. I doubt they move him.

I agree but if it needed a number, id say it would be close to Hampus LIndholm's trade and also contract number or at least similar both

Agreed on both points. Seems like he's earned a big contract.

Can't think of a single reason why Seattle would consider trading him

That wasn't the point of the post!

You don't know that. Price could very easily mean cost to acquire. And the ACGM is literally of another team

I'll start this off by saying Vince Dunn isn't getting traded. He's made a leap into a legitimate top-pairing defenseman who's formed a strong partnership with Adam Larsson to form the backbone of the Kraken defense. He's a pending RFA but will work out an extension with the team in the offseason, so he'll continue to be a foundational piece for years to come.

That point aside, in this hypothetical scenario, I think Dunn will cost at least what Hampus Lindholm did last deadline, if not more. The price for Lindholm was a first round pick, two second round picks, a prospect, and matching salary. However, Seattle would probably prefer more young established NHLers, so the exact package would look a bit different. Honestly, after trading for Horvat and with as old a roster as the Islanders have, I don't really see how they'd have the pieces to acquire Dunn.