Quoting: MitchJr
I think I’ve been pretty open re my antipathy toward the player - Henrique is an ave (overpaid) player on a bad team & without retention he is absolutely not worth a 1st imo. Even with retention I wouldn’t pay a 1st for him.
I was clearly referencing his full salary when I compared him to Copp’s salary last year.
Maybe Copp fit the profile of the type of player Rangers we’re looking for so they paid a premium. Henrique does not fit the profile of the type of player we need - we have skilled players; we need Bunting 2.0 - a bit of grit, size (preferably) with good hands. Marner / JT or Matthews / Nylander provide enough skill.
Those are all legitimate opinions, with the exception of your second sentence, because you clearly intended to suggest that Henrique's value re Copp is lessened due to his cap hit being $2 million more than Copp's, which it isn't in this instance (by a LOT); we're comparing the Copp trade to the trade here, not the Copp trade to an exchange with Henrique at full value.
What I objected to was your response to my friend
@LosPatos' statement that "Andrew Copp's package last year was a first," to which you replied "Copp went for two conditional seconds," thereby implying that the return was LESS than a first and that the comparable didn't apply. That's utterly bogus and you know it; you know that Copp was traded for a first AND a second and it makes no difference how that first came to be a first -- the bottom line is the bottom line. Moreover, Copp was a UFA when traded, and Henrique has another year left, which is another factor that elevates his value in comparisons to Copp.
Look, you're entitled to your opinion, including your opinion that Henrique doesn't fit the Maple Leafs, and none of us on the Anaheim side at least will deny that. But when you start to distort indisputable facts in support of that opinion, that's intellectually dishonest and tends to offend those of us who feel a commitment to academic veracity.