SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

This move sucks

Created by: DefenseFirst
Team: 2022-23 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 21, 2023
Published: Feb. 21, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
He’ll be the 7th best defensemen on this team, and they’re sure as hell not trading a 1st and a 3rd for a 7. This move is a move for the sake of making a move, and is absolute trash.
Trades
BOS
  1. Gavrikov, Vladislav ($1,400,000 retained)
CBJ
  1. 2023 1st round pick (BOS)
  2. 2023 3rd round pick (BOS)
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the LAK
2024
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2025
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$82,500,000$82,104,167$0$4,650,000$395,833
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,500,000$2,500,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000 (Performance Bonus$2,000,000$2M)
C
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,100,000$3,100,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,800,000$3,800,000
LW, C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,050,000$1,050,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$762,500$762,500
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,687,500$3,687,500
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
UFA - 8
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD
NTC, NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$150,000$150K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,137,500$1,137,500
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 21, 2023 at 1:46 p.m.
#1
Yegor bomb
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 782
Likes: 948
You guys slander Gavi too freaking much and I'm sick of it. That first is 30th overall at best and that 3rd will be late as well. This is not a bad trade at all
BoomerTheHero, Manson and Viqsi liked this.
Feb. 21, 2023 at 1:48 p.m.
#2
Dolzhenkov Is Coming
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 3,646
Likes: 5,277
Get ready for Lohrei to be included too. Word is that the 1st and 3rd are part of a package and the Jackets want Lohrei bad.
BoomerTheHero and Viqsi liked this.
Feb. 21, 2023 at 1:51 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 730
Matt porter is saying it isn’t true. Also with Nosek on LTIR they currently don’t need to make another move.
And they just flew out to Seattle without enough forwards if smith is moved.
Feb. 21, 2023 at 1:51 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,583
Likes: 5,455
Quoting: Civil_Eng_PE
You guys slander Gavi too freaking much and I'm sick of it. That first is 30th overall at best and that 3rd will be late as well. This is not a bad trade at all


Gavrikov is worth a 3rd. Maybe another 3rd if it's 50% retained. Trading a 1st and a 3rd for a third pair D is bad.
koofyslappa liked this.
Feb. 21, 2023 at 1:52 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,583
Likes: 5,455
Quoting: Newgod77
Matt porter is saying it isn’t true. Also with Nosek on LTIR they currently don’t need to make another move.
And they just flew out to Seattle without enough forwards if smith is moved.


Nosek could return. If he doesn't, they can always play 11F-7D for one game and they have time to recall a forward from Providence.
Feb. 21, 2023 at 1:54 p.m.
#6
Yegor bomb
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 782
Likes: 948
Quoting: bhavikp27
Gavrikov is worth a 3rd. Maybe another 3rd if it's 50% retained. Trading a 1st and a 3rd for a third pair D is bad.


Lol
BoomerTheHero and Viqsi liked this.
Feb. 21, 2023 at 1:55 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: Civil_Eng_PE
You guys slander Gavi too freaking much and I'm sick of it. That first is 30th overall at best and that 3rd will be late as well. This is not a bad trade at all


It is when you look at the Bruins roster. He would be the fourth best LD on this team.

They could run out and get a 7D that would be filling the role of “gavi,” (puke), for a 3rd.

But actually, why am i backtracking. He sucks.
Feb. 21, 2023 at 1:56 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: dk325
Get ready for Lohrei to be included too. Word is that the 1st and 3rd are part of a package and the Jackets want Lohrei bad.


Nah I’m still gonna live on planet earth.
Newgod77 liked this.
Feb. 21, 2023 at 1:56 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 730
Quoting: bhavikp27
Nosek could return. If he doesn't, they can always play 11F-7D for one game and they have time to recall a forward from Providence.



Then why wait till now to make this move. Could have been done a week ago. Price still seems the same.
Feb. 21, 2023 at 1:56 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: Newgod77
Matt porter is saying it isn’t true. Also with Nosek on LTIR they currently don’t need to make another move.
And they just flew out to Seattle without enough forwards if smith is moved.

Praying that’s true.
Feb. 21, 2023 at 2:20 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 730
Quoting: DefenseFirst
Praying that’s true.


None of this makes sense. Why wouldn’t Columbus just take a smiths expiring contract back? The cap hits are almost the same. Why would they wait for Boston to make another move if they don’t have a better offer? Why would Boston wait till they went out west to make a deal? It’s even more stupid if Columbus is retaining 50%. It’s a couple 100k gap for Boston to fit. Dude has been out over a week.
Feb. 21, 2023 at 2:30 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: Newgod77
None of this makes sense. Why wouldn’t Columbus just take a smiths expiring contract back? The cap hits are almost the same. Why would they wait for Boston to make another move if they don’t have a better offer? Why would Boston wait till they went out west to make a deal? It’s even more stupid if Columbus is retaining 50%. It’s a couple 100k gap for Boston to fit. Dude has been out over a week.


I’m just praying this all came from Jimmy Murphy or Joe Haggerty. Then we could know its BS.
Newgod77 liked this.
Feb. 21, 2023 at 3:15 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,583
Likes: 5,455
Quoting: Newgod77
None of this makes sense. Why wouldn’t Columbus just take a smiths expiring contract back? The cap hits are almost the same. Why would they wait for Boston to make another move if they don’t have a better offer? Why would Boston wait till they went out west to make a deal? It’s even more stupid if Columbus is retaining 50%. It’s a couple 100k gap for Boston to fit. Dude has been out over a week.


Columbus could want to use cap space for someone else. Plenty of teams have cap space but they aren't after every cap dump. The main point is Boston needs to clear cap, Columbus doesn't *have to* take Smith; their priority is to trade Gavrikov.
Feb. 21, 2023 at 3:18 p.m.
#14
45 for Norris.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 498
Likes: 328
Gavrikov is Better than Forbort and Grzelcyk. I’m sorry none of you have ever watched a Jackets game. Stats are not everything there’s something known as Defensive Defensman. I think a 1st and 3rd is a lot but it’s not horrible.

My Trade:
BOS Gets: Gavrikov ($1,400,000) Retained.
CBJ Gets: 2nd, 4th, Lohrei
Civil_Eng_PE, dk325 and Viqsi liked this.
Feb. 21, 2023 at 3:25 p.m.
#15
Yegor bomb
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 782
Likes: 948
Quoting: Manson
Gavrikov is Better than Forbort and Grzelcyk. I’m sorry none of you have ever watched a Jackets game. Stats are not everything there’s something known as Defensive Defensman. I think a 1st and 3rd is a lot but it’s not horrible.

My Trade:
BOS Gets: Gavrikov ($1,400,000) Retained.
CBJ Gets: 2nd, 4th, Lohrei


I knew I always liked ducks fans
Manson, dk325 and Viqsi liked this.
Feb. 21, 2023 at 3:29 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 730
Quoting: bhavikp27
Columbus could want to use cap space for someone else. Plenty of teams have cap space but they aren't after every cap dump. The main point is Boston needs to clear cap, Columbus doesn't *have to* take Smith; their priority is to trade Gavrikov.


That would be stupid to risk losing a first not to take an expiring contract 3/4 through the season. Hopefully Sweeney doesn’t return their calls and Columbus keeps him. He isn’t worth the ask anyway.
bhavikp27 liked this.
Feb. 21, 2023 at 3:31 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: bhavikp27
Columbus could want to use cap space for someone else. Plenty of teams have cap space but they aren't after every cap dump. The main point is Boston needs to clear cap, Columbus doesn't *have to* take Smith; their priority is to trade Gavrikov.


The main point should be that gavrikov to boston makes absolutely zero sense, unless the price tag is about half of what it’s reported to be.
Feb. 21, 2023 at 3:32 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,583
Likes: 5,455
Quoting: Manson
Gavrikov is Better than Forbort and Grzelcyk. I’m sorry none of you have ever watched a Jackets game. Stats are not everything there’s something known as Defensive Defensman. I think a 1st and 3rd is a lot but it’s not horrible.

My Trade:
BOS Gets: Gavrikov ($1,400,000) Retained.
CBJ Gets: 2nd, 4th, Lohrei


Gavrikov is not better than Grzelcyk. Gavrikov was good in 2019-20 but he doesn't have this level of play anymore and it's not solely due to his higher workload. You don't give up two seconds/a 1st+3rd for his services unless you want to make a bad trade. Bruins are fine the way they are.

Also, not that I only use stats but stats can show the impact of defensive defensemen (literally Vlasic, Carlo, McDonagh). It's just a poor excuse to justify bad performances.
Newgod77 liked this.
Feb. 21, 2023 at 3:32 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,583
Likes: 5,455
Quoting: DefenseFirst
The main point should be that gavrikov to boston makes absolutely zero sense, unless the price tag is about half of what it’s reported to be.


Yes, I agree.
Feb. 21, 2023 at 3:33 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: Manson
Gavrikov is Better than Forbort and Grzelcyk. I’m sorry none of you have ever watched a Jackets game. Stats are not everything there’s something known as Defensive Defensman. I think a 1st and 3rd is a lot but it’s not horrible.

My Trade:
BOS Gets: Gavrikov ($1,400,000) Retained.
CBJ Gets: 2nd, 4th, Lohrei


Both your trade, and the position that gavrikov is better than forbort and grzelcyk are insane.
Feb. 21, 2023 at 7:17 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 816
Likes: 240
Literally couldnt agree more.

Its depressing how much debating there is in the comments lol
DefenseFirst liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll