SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Columbus TDL

Created by: bluspy88
Team: 2022-23 Columbus Blue Jackets
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 24, 2023
Published: Feb. 24, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I don't see how they pull of Chychrun to be honest. I feel like there are others (LAK?) who are going to pull the trigger first and can offer more enticing pieces. Otherwise, I'll be navigating them through what trades I think are most likely.
Trades
1.
CBJ
  1. Blomqvist, Joel [Reserve List]
  2. Blueger, Teddy
  3. 2023 2nd round pick (PIT)
  4. 2023 3rd round pick (NJD)
  5. 2024 4th round pick (PIT)
Additional Details:
I'm not quite sure how CBJ fans feel about this return. I kinda think they might not get as much for Gavrikov now as they originally hoped. But the 2nd and 3rd in 2023 are solid, and Blomqvist seems like a goalie who projects to come to NA next year and build that pipeline a bit.
PIT
  1. Gavrikov, Vladislav ($1,400,000 retained)
  2. Robinson, Eric
Additional Details:
I've been thinking about this as I worked on this ACGM. I initially was going to have Dumoulin as part of it, but I doubt he'd waive for CBJ. However, adding Gavrikov could help the Penguins reduce the minutes Dumoulin has to play. Robinson brings good, fast, checking energy to a team that needs a jolt in the bottom 6.

If I did the math right, this trade as it is would give the Penguins $425,000 in space. If they bury Kapanen they'll get a bit more (not sure exactly how much) or if he is claimed/dumped then they get even more. Could have some fun with that space. Hextall wouldn't have touched his 2025 picks at all, and still has 1sts and 2nds in 2023/2024 to play with.
2.
CBJ
  1. 2023 5th round pick (EDM)
Additional Details:
Conditions to the pick would be tricky:

Becomes a 4th if he plays in 25% of EDM playoff games. 3rd if they make the WCF, and he has played 25% of games to that point (so if they lost in the 2nd round and he played in 25%, just a 4th).
EDM
  1. Nyquist, Gustav ($2,750,000 retained)
Additional Details:
Lots of reporting by Friedman and others that Nyquist will still be traded at the TDL, as he is expected to be healthy for the playoffs. I think this is a worthwhile move for the Oilers, who can put him on LTIR until then. I think they have to make room for a single day to do this, but I think with the retention and (assuming) they dump JP, that is doable.
3.
CBJ
  1. Reilly, Mike
  2. Zboril, Jakub
  3. 2023 3rd round pick (BOS)
Additional Details:
Reilly can be a placeholder for a team very thin on LHD at the moment. Zboril has good underlying numbers, and could play more minutes in CBJ. The 3rd gets them Reilly, as I think Zboril isn't negative value so him plus the third for 1.25 years of Reilly isn't a bad return. I did send Boston Bayreuther as a cheap depth guy. But, you're getting a 3rd, a servicable NHL LHD to flip in 2024, and a young-ish LHD with some good metrics for a guy who may honestly come back to CBJ next year (like he did in the expansion).
BOS
  1. Bayreuther, Gavin
Additional Details:
This one's a bit tricky because Boston is run a bit dry, and there may be hard feelings over Gavrikov falling through. There may be more assets but just an example. Boston fans who will say they need depth at the deadline, I think Bayreuther could fill that role while there are still options like Schenn, Seeler, and Braun available.
4.
CBJ
  1. Pinelli, Francesco
  2. 2023 6th round pick (LAK)
  3. 2024 7th round pick (LAK)
LAK
  1. Korpisalo, Joonas ($650,000 retained)
  2. 2023 4th round pick (WPG)
Additional Details:
I'm going to use the Ben Bishop to LAK deal from 2017 as a guide for this deal. That year, Bishop was 30 years old and a pending UFA. He had a .911 SV% with Tampa Bay before the deal. Korpisalo is 28, a pending UFA, and has a .913 SV% as of my writing this. Bishop was 20% retained, I'm going with 50% in case LAK want to add more at the deadline (and assuming they can't get anyone to take Petersen or Quick).

If we measure the return based on this, Tampa got back: A good prospect in Cernak, a replacment goalie of a lower tier (Budaj), and a 7th round pick. The Kings also got a 5th with Bishop. So for this, I propose the following:

LAK Receive: Korpisalo (50% retained) and a 4th rounder
CBJ Receive: Francesco Pinelli, a 6th rounder, and a conditional 7th rounder (if Korpisalo resigns in LA).

Pinelli fits a similar mold to Cernak, a CHL player with good numbers but not a world breaker for the kings to give up with multiple other good young forwards ahead of him. Otherwise, I adjusted the picks a bit to reflect that Korpisalo is being retained more and is older. Now, it would be tough for LA to resign him next year (especially if they add someone like Chychrun), but its not impossible if they move another defenseman in that deal (or another) and perhaps move out one person next year. I wouldn't expect Korpisalo to command that much, but certainly more than 1.3.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the CBJ
2024
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the LAK
2025
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$74,662,500$0$2,900,000$7,837,500
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$9,750,000$9,750,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$8,700,000$8,700,000
C, RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$762,500$762,500
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$3,750,000$3,750,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$925,000$925K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,200,000$2,200,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,500,000$2,500,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$750,000$750,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,525,000$1,525,000
LW, C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$750,000$750,000
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,137,500$1,137,500
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$5,400,000$5,400,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,050,000$1,050,000
G
RFA - 3
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$925,000$925,000
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$787,500$787,500
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$925,000$925,000
RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$8,250,000$8,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$9,583,333$9,583,333
LD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,333,333$2,333,333
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$975,000$975,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$700,000$700K)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$750,000$750,000
RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 24, 2023 at 4:37 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 953
Likes: 409
Honestly, I've been pretty bearish on Gavrikov. He's struggled under the larger role he's been forced into this year. If the goal is to lessen Dumoulin's role, there are probably better options to be had. And Hextall spoke a couple hours ago about not wanting to give up significant assets for a rental, which is what Gavrikov would be. I'm not excited about trading Blomqvist particularly much. Maybe Hextall doesn't consider him to be "significant assets", but imo he's our best goalie prospect. A 2nd and a B-ish goalie prospect got us Rakell last year. It's not the best comparison, but I don't see Gavrikov being as beneficial to PIT.
Feb. 24, 2023 at 4:45 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 14,550
Likes: 6,145
LA was not high on Cernak when they traded him. Kudos to Tampa Bay's development staff for turning him into a quality NHL defenseman.

The Kings are very high on Pinelli. He's tearing up juniors at the moment and the Kings are looking forward to getting this kid back at development camp this summer. He's not going to be traded for a rental.

The Kings have said they're not interested in a rental goaltender and will instead look at longer-term solutions at goaltender in the off-season.
Feb. 24, 2023 at 4:48 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 980
Likes: 286
Quoting: Haymaker26
Honestly, I've been pretty bearish on Gavrikov. He's struggled under the larger role he's been forced into this year. If the goal is to lessen Dumoulin's role, there are probably better options to be had. And Hextall spoke a couple hours ago about not wanting to give up significant assets for a rental, which is what Gavrikov would be. I'm not excited about trading Blomqvist particularly much. Maybe Hextall doesn't consider him to be "significant assets", but imo he's our best goalie prospect. A 2nd and a B-ish goalie prospect got us Rakell last year. It's not the best comparison, but I don't see Gavrikov being as beneficial to PIT.


I mean, he would lessen Dumoulin's role by taking more minutes from him by existing. I agree he isn't going to blow you away, but he isn't a nothing player. Also, he could certainly not be a rental if the Penguins wanted. Dumoulin will be up after this season (doubtful he stays I'd say), and I can't see a defensive defenseman commanding that much on the market that it will break the bank. Throw in the fact that Blueger and Jarry will be up, and there's a good chance Kapanen and Carter could be dumped (or maybe Carter LTIRetires). I see your point with Blomqvist though. I could see him coming out of this deal and it just being the picks, or maybe someone like Laatsch?
Feb. 24, 2023 at 4:53 p.m.
#4
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,385
Likes: 25,289
Just a small note: you cannot make a trade conditional upon a player re-signing any more.
Ajp_18 and bluspy88 liked this.
Feb. 24, 2023 at 4:59 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 980
Likes: 286
Quoting: tkecanuck341
LA was not high on Cernak when they traded him. Kudos to Tampa Bay's development staff for turning him into a quality NHL defenseman.

The Kings are very high on Pinelli. He's tearing up juniors at the moment and the Kings are looking forward to getting this kid back at development camp this summer. He's not going to be traded for a rental.

The Kings have said they're not interested in a rental goaltender and will instead look at longer-term solutions at goaltender in the off-season.


Well, that's great that they will look at "longer-term solutions" but other than Vejmelka (who I bet you'd have to give up even more for if you), I don't really know what else is out there. I know Demko has been rumored but I just don't see it. Korpisalo doesn't have to be a rental either. If he plays well, you can extend him and I don't think he would command so much. He's suited to be in a duo like with Copley or someone else. I'd say you're looking at around 3 million, as he's never proven to "the guy" who is going to get closer to 5+.

Listen, I get that the Kings are high on Pinelli and Cernak was under the radar. But Cernak is a defensive defenseman first and foremost, they can be tough to read. Here's my argument against what you said. #1, we all love our teams prospects but realistically most of them will not have a spot to play on our team or will bust. #2 the Kings center depth is great. If your team is entering its competing window (which the Kings are I'd say), and you have guys like Byfield (superstar potential), Kupari, Turcotte (still good potential), Madden, Thomas, Hughes all seen as future NHLers, playing with legit NHL centers Kopitar/Danault/Lizotte. Yes Kopitar is getting old, but he's still damn good. If Korpisalo plays well like he has for the Kings, and you can afford to keep him around...is that not a good deal?
Feb. 24, 2023 at 5:07 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 14,550
Likes: 6,145
Quoting: bluspy88
Well, that's great that they will look at "longer-term solutions" but other than Vejmelka (who I bet you'd have to give up even more for if you), I don't really know what else is out there. I know Demko has been rumored but I just don't see it. Korpisalo doesn't have to be a rental either. If he plays well, you can extend him and I don't think he would command so much. He's suited to be in a duo like with Copley or someone else. I'd say you're looking at around 3 million, as he's never proven to "the guy" who is going to get closer to 5+.

Listen, I get that the Kings are high on Pinelli and Cernak was under the radar. But Cernak is a defensive defenseman first and foremost, they can be tough to read. Here's my argument against what you said. #1, we all love our teams prospects but realistically most of them will not have a spot to play on our team or will bust. #2 the Kings center depth is great. If your team is entering its competing window (which the Kings are I'd say), and you have guys like Byfield (superstar potential), Kupari, Turcotte (still good potential), Madden, Thomas, Hughes all seen as future NHLers, playing with legit NHL centers Kopitar/Danault/Lizotte. Yes Kopitar is getting old, but he's still damn good. If Korpisalo plays well like he has for the Kings, and you can afford to keep him around...is that not a good deal?


If the Kings are trading away assets for rentals, they're going to be guys in the 22-23 year old age range that are soon to lose their waiver exemption like Kupari, ****emo, Madden, Thomas, Turcotte, etc. All these guys are quality prospects, but the Kings can only fit so many on the roster next year.

If the Kings are moving a guy like Pinelli, it's going to be for a goaltender with some term on his contract. Korpisalo isn't it.
Feb. 24, 2023 at 9:57 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 2,400
Likes: 866
I had a post that didn’t receive too much hate on the assets/cost for a Chychrun acquision…under “Crystal ball”

https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/3961338
bluspy88 liked this.
Mar. 1, 2023 at 12:53 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 980
Likes: 286
Quoting: tkecanuck341
If the Kings are trading away assets for rentals, they're going to be guys in the 22-23 year old age range that are soon to lose their waiver exemption like Kupari, ****emo, Madden, Thomas, Turcotte, etc. All these guys are quality prospects, but the Kings can only fit so many on the roster next year.

If the Kings are moving a guy like Pinelli, it's going to be for a goaltender with some term on his contract. Korpisalo isn't it.


Well no Pinelli, but they did get Korpi despite your assurance that they are "not interested" in a rental goalie!
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll