Boeser isn't going anywhere unless Vancouver either retains a good chunk of salary, pays someone to take him or takes a worse contract back.

your funny,boeser is good for 20 plus every year,no chance the canucks do this.

Yeah I like Boeser but that's not the deal

I think the player you are referring to is Mangiapane and not Boeser.
Boeser 6.65M 46 points 0.74 pts per game
Mangi 5.8M 35 points 0.49 pts per game

Changing the subject again? This post is about Boeser not Mangiapane. However...

You're comparing a one dimensional slow lazy player sheltered with mostly offensive zone starts who's the 2nd worst plus/minus on his team (only OEL is worse) to a hard working two way player with good speed who's a plus player while playing practically the entire year (except the last few games) on a shutdown line with mostly defensive zone starts.

Boeser is nowhere near the player Mangiapane is. The funniest part is the shutdown player going up against other teams' best players actually has more goals than the supposed goal scorer in a sheltered role.

for someone who comments on every canuck, in a negative way,you sure dont know there players.boeser is a top 6 winger,and a sure bet for 20 plus every yr.last time i checked mangipane wasnt exactly lighting it up.and no the canucks arent trading boeser for huberdeau.

You are right...Boeser is no where near the player Mangi is. Cause Brock is actually good.