SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Flames offseason

Created by: Boomer125
Team: 2023-24 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 20, 2023
Published: Apr. 21, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
CGY
  1. Niemelä, Topi
  2. Robertson, Nicholas
  3. 2023 1st round pick (BOS)
  4. 2024 1st round pick (TOR)
TOR
  1. Lindholm, Elias
  2. 2023 4th round pick (CGY)
2.
CGY
  1. Granlund, Mikael
  2. Nylander, Alexander [RFA Rights]
  3. 2023 1st round pick (PIT)
  4. 2024 3rd round pick (VGK)
3.
WSH
  1. Backlund, Mikael
  2. 2024 3rd round pick (CGY)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2024
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2025
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,500,000$69,610,833$0$1,062,500$13,889,167
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$10,500,000$10,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,125,000$2,125,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,300,000$1,300,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,200,000$2,200,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,125,000$1,125,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$796,667$796,667
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 21, 2023 at 10:18 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 1,922
Likes: 779
Caps can get more for Kuznetsov. The would decline.
Apr. 21, 2023 at 10:27 a.m.
#2
RMNB
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 134
Likes: 47
Caps easily decline they don't fill any needs with this trade. And kuzy is worth way more.
Apr. 21, 2023 at 10:40 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 460
you wont get that from the Leafs for 1 season. That is a huge offer. Maybe you forgot to include weegar.
Apr. 21, 2023 at 10:40 a.m.
#4
ej15 BYATCH
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 238
tml denies
Apr. 21, 2023 at 10:43 a.m.
#5
Leafs Sufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 4,073
Likes: 3,511
Edited Apr. 21, 2023 at 11:30 a.m.
Big price tag to pay for Lindholm to come in and be the 3C.

Edit: Before people go crazy saying I'm claiming Lindholm to be a 3C, I'm not. I'm saying he'd play 3C in Toronto.
Apr. 21, 2023 at 10:52 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2015
Posts: 410
Likes: 138
Leafs don't have a need for Lindholm, Caps would want more.
Flames should probably take the Pens trade, but taking on Granlund makes me cringe
Apr. 21, 2023 at 11:04 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 20
Likes: 3
Caps would want more but Backs is probably not going to want to get traded to a team that is entering a re-tool. He needs to go to a competitor.

No need to trade Mangiapane but Hanifin would bring back a a good haul.
Apr. 21, 2023 at 11:38 a.m.
#8
Leafs going to Leafs
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 10,136
Likes: 3,068
Quoting: Ritzy
Big price tag to pay for Lindholm to come in and be the 3C.

Edit: Before people go crazy saying I'm claiming Lindholm to be a 3C, I'm not. I'm saying he'd play 3C in Toronto.


Arguably would be the 4C in TML considering we can just resign ROR for the price of the contract
Apr. 21, 2023 at 11:40 a.m.
#9
Leafs going to Leafs
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 10,136
Likes: 3,068
Why would the Leafs pay 2 extra 1sts, Niemela and Robertson for a guy that would do similar things to ROR (who wants to be here and can resign for a cheaper cost)
Apr. 21, 2023 at 12:00 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 8,038
Likes: 3,236
Caps pass.
Apr. 21, 2023 at 1:06 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,731
Likes: 19,804
Quoting: Leafsfan98
Arguably would be the 4C in TML considering we can just resign ROR for the price of the contract


Lmao what? There is no world where ROR would be ahead of Lindholm in the depth chart anymore. And just like how ROR came in and moved Tavares to the wing, Lindholm wpuld do the exact same thing because he is the better center than JT
Apr. 21, 2023 at 1:38 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,150
Likes: 1,640
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Lmao what? There is no world where ROR would be ahead of Lindholm in the depth chart anymore. And just like how ROR came in and moved Tavares to the wing, Lindholm wpuld do the exact same thing because he is the better center than JT


Well he's not the better C (yet) he's a really good 2 C who actually plays better on the wing. I like Lindholm which is why I'd pay that price for him. A pile of Leafs fans dumped all over this deal simply because they have overvalued the 2 very late 1sts sent over to Calgary in this deal assuming we couldn't or wouldn't be able to resign him. I feel like this a good deal for both teams assuming Calgary with an overhaul of management is also preparing to rebuild.
Apr. 21, 2023 at 1:40 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,150
Likes: 1,640
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Lmao what? There is no world where ROR would be ahead of Lindholm in the depth chart anymore. And just like how ROR came in and moved Tavares to the wing, Lindholm wpuld do the exact same thing because he is the better center than JT


And yes the purpose of acquiring Lindholm is to push ROR into 3 C and be able to fill the 2 C spot if JT feels the wing is better for him as he winds down his career
Apr. 21, 2023 at 1:43 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,150
Likes: 1,640
Quoting: Leafsfan98
Why would the Leafs pay 2 extra 1sts, Niemela and Robertson for a guy that would do similar things to ROR (who wants to be here and can resign for a cheaper cost)


We'll both 1st end picks are very late, Robertson as far as I can tell is on his way to not playing for the Leafs or the league for that matter so really no real value there other than he's a flyer with potential. Niemela is the value piece. We are paying a premium to add a top 6 if not Top 3 forward to our group with an AAV under 5 for the single season also gives the Leafs a back up signing option should Matthews (entirely possible) walks away for big money south of the border
Apr. 21, 2023 at 1:44 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,731
Likes: 19,804
Quoting: Boomer125
Well he's not the better C (yet) he's a really good 2 C who actually plays better on the wing. I like Lindholm which is why I'd pay that price for him. A pile of Leafs fans dumped all over this deal simply because they have overvalued the 2 very late 1sts sent over to Calgary in this deal assuming we couldn't or wouldn't be able to resign him. I feel like this a good deal for both teams assuming Calgary with an overhaul of management is also preparing to rebuild.


I don't think Toronto should make this deal personally. Even though Lindholm wpuld fit great as 2C there and he's better than ROR, I don't think the cap savings for only next year plus the upgrade is worth spending the cost here to acquire Lindholm. If you can keep ROR for free at like 5x4 or 4.5x4 you should absolutely do that
Apr. 21, 2023 at 1:46 p.m.
#16
Leafs going to Leafs
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 10,136
Likes: 3,068
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Lmao what? There is no world where ROR would be ahead of Lindholm in the depth chart anymore. And just like how ROR came in and moved Tavares to the wing, Lindholm wpuld do the exact same thing because he is the better center than JT


I would rather ROR in that centre role, especially come playoffs, JT is also a better centre than Lindholm and Lindholm is far worse than Matthews... unless he moves to the wing, he'd be the 4C
Apr. 21, 2023 at 1:46 p.m.
#17
Leafs going to Leafs
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 10,136
Likes: 3,068
Quoting: Boomer125
We'll both 1st end picks are very late, Robertson as far as I can tell is on his way to not playing for the Leafs or the league for that matter so really no real value there other than he's a flyer with potential. Niemela is the value piece. We are paying a premium to add a top 6 if not Top 3 forward to our group with an AAV under 5 for the single season also gives the Leafs a back up signing option should Matthews (entirely possible) walks away for big money south of the border


I would rather get another top tier defensemen and have 3 very good defensive pairs
Apr. 21, 2023 at 1:56 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,150
Likes: 1,640
Quoting: Leafsfan98
I would rather get another top tier defensemen and have 3 very good defensive pairs


And who might this "top tier" defenseman be? He'll surely eat up 6.5 - 10 million is cap (that's how much top tier dman command) plus the acquisition costs would be arguably higher than this proposal
Apr. 21, 2023 at 1:59 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,731
Likes: 19,804
Quoting: Leafsfan98
I would rather ROR in that centre role, especially come playoffs, JT is also a better centre than Lindholm and Lindholm is far worse than Matthews... unless he moves to the wing, he'd be the 4C


I agree that Toronto should try and keep ROR because he's free and won't cost over 8M to re-sign in a year. And I agree Lindholm's worse than Matthews. The rest i completely disagree with. There is no world where you should have JT at center when you have Lindholm and/or ROR on the team and healthy.
Apr. 21, 2023 at 2:05 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,150
Likes: 1,640
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I agree that Toronto should try and keep ROR because he's free and won't cost over 8M to re-sign in a year. And I agree Lindholm's worse than Matthews. The rest i completely disagree with. There is no world where you should have JT at center when you have Lindholm and/or ROR on the team and healthy.


Tavares will remain at C , he is better at the position than both ROR and Lindholm at the moment, he's not old yet (32) he'll be 34 when his contract is up, that's when I can see JT sliding down the depth chart to a 3 C role. He is still today a ppg player with good to very good defensive metrics
Apr. 21, 2023 at 2:07 p.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,150
Likes: 1,640
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I agree that Toronto should try and keep ROR because he's free and won't cost over 8M to re-sign in a year. And I agree Lindholm's worse than Matthews. The rest i completely disagree with. There is no world where you should have JT at center when you have Lindholm and/or ROR on the team and healthy.


FYI both JT and ROR are the same age, ROR is grittier and better on the defensive side of the puck than JT but JT is far better on the offensive side of the puck
Apr. 21, 2023 at 2:08 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,731
Likes: 19,804
Quoting: Boomer125
Tavares will remain at C , he is better at the position than both ROR and Lindholm at the moment, he's not old yet (32) he'll be 34 when his contract is up, that's when I can see JT sliding down the depth chart to a 3 C role. He is still today a ppg player with good to very good defensive metrics


Im confused, who were you calling "better on the wing" if it's not Tavares then i have no idea who you are referring to
Apr. 21, 2023 at 2:11 p.m.
#23
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,150
Likes: 1,640
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Im confused, who were you calling "better on the wing" if it's not Tavares then i have no idea who you are referring to


I have mentioned nothing about the wing, I saying JT is better than both ROR and Lindholm at the center position. Lindholm is a better on the wing than both JT and ROR
Apr. 21, 2023 at 2:14 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,731
Likes: 19,804
Quoting: Boomer125
I have mentioned nothing about the wing, I saying JT is better than both ROR and Lindholm at the center position. Lindholm is a better on the wing than both JT and ROR


You said
Well he's not the better C (yet) he's a really good 2 C who actually plays better on the wing.
Apr. 21, 2023 at 2:17 p.m.
#25
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,150
Likes: 1,640
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
You said
Well he's not the better C (yet) he's a really good 2 C who actually plays better on the wing.


Ah yes , I was talking about Lindholm, Lindholm is not the better C (yet) compared to Tavares , fast forward 2 or 3 seasons and Lindholm will be the better C as Lindholm is 4 years younger than JT
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll