SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Meier to Calgary

Created by: DopeGM
Team: 2023-24 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: May 16, 2023
Published: May 16, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Say NJD like Markstrom and lose out on Hellye. This deal could happen despite the no trade clauses because of the Lindholm trade and sign.

Obviously Markstrom’s stats are going to be a loud rebuttal on here but NJD likes the advanced stats and Markstrom has always seemed to be an analytics darling (I know this year he was bad either lense)
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
8$8,500,000
5$3,750,000
Trades
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2024
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2025
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,500,000$79,539,166$0$865,000$3,960,834
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$10,500,000$10,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
$8,500,000$8,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,800,000$5,800,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,125,000$2,125,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$3,750,000$3,750,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,300,000$1,300,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333
LW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$813,333$813,333 (Performance Bonus$15,000$15K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,200,000$2,200,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 16, 2023 at 11:34 a.m.
#1
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,408
Likes: 10,719
Trading a center for a winger would be dumb
May 16, 2023 at 11:34 a.m.
#2
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,408
Likes: 10,719
Quoting: Gmonwy
Trading a center for a winger would be dumb


And you are extremely over the cap
May 16, 2023 at 11:35 a.m.
#3
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 12,247
Likes: 3,261
Not even remotely close to enough. Timo>Lindholm, Yegor>Tanev, Vitek>Markstrom.
May 16, 2023 at 11:36 a.m.
#4
jeremy clackston
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 457
Likes: 219
Quoting: dgibb10
Not even remotely close to enough. Timo>Lindholm, Yegor>Tanev, Vitek>Markstrom.


Lindholm>Timo generally but for the devils it is Timo>Lindholm
May 16, 2023 at 11:59 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,833
Likes: 18,585
All good pieces, but not a path we would go down. I’d prefer Timo over a year of Lindholm. Would rather keep Vitek over Markstrom.

If Devils moved Timo, younger pieces with term would likely be the target.
May 16, 2023 at 12:29 p.m.
#6
Dr_Invictus
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 879
No thanks
May 16, 2023 at 1:21 p.m.
#7
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 12,247
Likes: 3,261
Quoting: eazy_duz_it
Lindholm>Timo generally but for the devils it is Timo>Lindholm


I'd much rather have the younger goal scoring power forward than the older 2 way center (who I view as a 2C)
May 16, 2023 at 1:33 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,705
Likes: 19,796
Quoting: dgibb10
I'd much rather have the younger goal scoring power forward than the older 2 way center (who I view as a 2C)


And Calgary would rather have a top 6 center so the trade is flawed to begin with
May 16, 2023 at 3:04 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Serious armchairGM:)
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 293
Likes: 39
Flawed trade if you think our future centre solutions will arise out of a Lindholm deal. I don’t see that happening. This is a messy retool.

Lindholm is a perfect winger complement for NJD I would think. But then why wouldn’t you just keep Meier. I’d much rather have Lindholm L/T over Bratt.

Basically I was looking for homes for Markstrom and Lindholm as a package. There aren’t many options. Buffalo. STL.
May 16, 2023 at 3:10 p.m.
#10
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 12,247
Likes: 3,261
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
And Calgary would rather have a top 6 center so the trade is flawed to begin with


Yup 100%, in NJ he's either a 3C or plays with hughes in the haula role. EIther way he's filling the haula role, and while it'd be a nice luxury, it's not one I'm giving up meier for. Bratt maybe
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll