SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Its been a while

Created by: Aussie_Blackhawk
Team: 2023-24 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: May 26, 2023
Published: May 26, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$800,000
3$1,750,000
2$962,500
1$2,250,000
3$3,250,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Bedard, Connor
3$950,000
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Boeser, Brock
  2. 2023 1st round pick (VAN)
VAN
  1. Slaggert, Landon [Reserve List]
  2. 2023 1st round pick (TBL)
  3. 2023 2nd round pick (CHI)
  4. 2023 3rd round pick (DAL)
2.
CHI
  1. Sharangovich, Yegor [RFA Rights]
  2. 2023 6th round pick (NJD)
NJD
  1. 2023 2nd round pick (NYR)
3.
CHI
  1. Bailey, Josh
  2. 2024 2nd round pick (NYI)
NYI
4.
CHI
  1. 2023 1st round pick (VGK)
VGK
  1. Harding, Taige [Reserve List]
  2. 2023 2nd round pick (OTT)
  3. 2024 2nd round pick (NYI)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Recapture Fees
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the CHI
2024
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2025
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$63,635,124$0$1,387,500$19,864,876
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$3,250,000$3,250,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Bedard, Connor
$950,000$950,000
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,650,000$6,650,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$505,000$505K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,650,000$2,650,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$758,333$758,333
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LW, C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$758,333$758,333
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,200,000$1,200,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
RW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$962,500$962,500
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,800,000$3,800,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$859,167$859,167 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
LW, C
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 26, 2023 at 8:40 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 402
Likes: 119
First reasonable proposal I've seen from a Hawks fan involving the Canucks!

Value seems fair all round.
Aussie_Blackhawk liked this.
May 26, 2023 at 8:43 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2022
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 3,124
I've heard the Sharangovich rumors. IMO a 2nd is an overpayment at the moment for the Hawks (not an overpayment in general) because of where they are in the rebuild. IDK though, maybe landing Bedard makes this more justifiable to get young NHL talent around him.
Aussie_Blackhawk liked this.
May 26, 2023 at 9:19 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,287
Likes: 4,932
Don't love the VGK trade for the hawks. I'd rather pick twice in the 2nd. And also, I think the hawks should be giving a lower pick in the 2nd, at minimum the Ottowa pick, in the VAN deal
Aussie_Blackhawk liked this.
May 26, 2023 at 9:22 a.m.
#4
n.1 Topias Vilen fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 5,924
Likes: 2,577
Devils accept. I know that it may be "buying low" on Sharangovich and therefore an overpayment but he would thrive in an expanded role
Aussie_Blackhawk liked this.
May 26, 2023 at 9:34 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 4,377
Likes: 2,241
Quoting: JK74
I've heard the Sharangovich rumors. IMO a 2nd is an overpayment at the moment for the Hawks (not an overpayment in general) because of where they are in the rebuild. IDK though, maybe landing Bedard makes this more justifiable to get young NHL talent around him.


I think you nailed it here. I don't think CHI should only focus on getting overpaid players and paid to take them on in the rebuild. At least Sharangovich is young, and may give Bedard someone with potential to grow. Unless CHI is committed to drafting with all those picks, it's probably smart to try and get some "now" talent that in the end is just for a mid 2nd.
Aussie_Blackhawk liked this.
May 27, 2023 at 6:56 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 4,986
Likes: 2,356
Quoting: Turkish_Canuck
First reasonable proposal I've seen from a Hawks fan involving the Canucks!

Value seems fair all round.


For me, this is the value if its done prior to draft day. Personally, and I know its debatable. Depending on who drops, if anyone drops. I feel the risk factor for VAN increases if this deal happens during the draft and think either the 2nd, 3rd or both are changed depending on the scenario
May 27, 2023 at 7:05 a.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 4,986
Likes: 2,356
Quoting: JK74
I've heard the Sharangovich rumors. IMO a 2nd is an overpayment at the moment for the Hawks (not an overpayment in general) because of where they are in the rebuild. IDK though, maybe landing Bedard makes this more justifiable to get young NHL talent around him.


Yes very torn on this idea and the reality is we could run it back with AA. I feel Sharangovich could thrive with Bedard as he did with Hughes and he has experience on the PK, though the analytics don't jump out at you. He is defensively responsible can play with pace and can score.

Quoting: Wadejos123
Don't love the VGK trade for the hawks. I'd rather pick twice in the 2nd. And also, I think the hawks should be giving a lower pick in the 2nd, at minimum the Ottowa pick, in the VAN deal


I tend to agree though had based this off the intention KD wants to get another 1st rounder and VGK holding out on value.

Yes that 2nd in the VAN proposal could very well be the OTT 2nd and I think which pick gets traded in any real trade will be determined when the trade is done. The timeline on this is key IMO.

Quoting: pretzelcoatl
Devils accept. I know that it may be "buying low" on Sharangovich and therefore an overpayment but he would thrive in an expanded role


Quoting: NJDevils1317
I think you nailed it here. I don't think CHI should only focus on getting overpaid players and paid to take them on in the rebuild. At least Sharangovich is young, and may give Bedard someone with potential to grow. Unless CHI is committed to drafting with all those picks, it's probably smart to try and get some "now" talent that in the end is just for a mid 2nd.


The thinking is that he played really well with Hughes and could do the same with Bedard. He's a bigger body and can handle his defensive duties and shoot. Personally I'm not sold on the 2nd and would prefer it to be the 3rd but that would be handled during negotiations. His value is probably the lowest since breaking out but he can probably still fetch a 2nd and we could give him a bridge deal whether its 2 or 3 years.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll