SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Around the net

Created by: Leafsmania
Team: 2023-24 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 1, 2023
Published: Jun. 2, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,750,000
4$4,000,000
2$1,000,000
5$5,000,000
3$1,500,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Martinook, Jordan
  2. Noesen, Stefan
  3. 2023 1st round pick (CAR)
  4. 2023 2nd round pick (CAR)
  5. 2024 1st round pick (CAR)
2.
VAN
  1. Liljegren, Timothy
  2. 2023 1st round pick (CAR)
3.
TOR
  1. 2024 4th round pick (PIT)
PIT
  1. Holmberg, Pontus [RFA Rights]
4.
ARI
  1. Muzzin, Jake
  2. 2023 2nd round pick (CAR)
  3. 2024 1st round pick (CAR)
5.
TOR
  1. 2023 3rd round pick (CAR)
SJS
  1. Murray, Matt
  2. 2023 1st round pick (BOS)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2024
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
2025
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$84,500,000$83,353,450$0$0$1,146,550

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$4,300,000$4,300,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C, LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
$4,000,000$4,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
$1,750,000$1,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$1,800,000$1,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,150,000$1,150,000
RW, C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$7,500,000$7,500,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
UFA - 1
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$766,667$766,667
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,100,000$1,100,000
RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$796,667$796,667
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$762,500$762,500
LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 2, 2023 at 3:47 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 405
Likes: 120
I'd accept
Warpbox liked this.
Jun. 2, 2023 at 7:01 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 3,625
Likes: 1,222
That is a pile; what a joke trade for leafs 🤦🏻
Jun. 2, 2023 at 8:38 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 4,336
Likes: 1,238
That's a more reasonable expectation of a return for Marner
Jun. 2, 2023 at 9:42 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 1,634
Likes: 531
No
Jun. 2, 2023 at 9:53 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
LeafsMania
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 291
Likes: 26
Quoting: poeticentropy
No


Could you be more specific. I am not sure which trade you are against and could you add what you would add/subtract to make it work in your teams favour.
Jun. 2, 2023 at 9:55 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 9,294
Likes: 2,973
why would Toronto accept that Marner deal?
Jun. 2, 2023 at 9:56 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 1,634
Likes: 531
Quoting: Leafsmania
Could you be more specific. I am not sure which trade you are against and could you add what you would add/subtract to make it work in your teams favour.


SJ Murray trade. Remove 5th
Jun. 2, 2023 at 9:56 a.m.
#8
Thread Starter
LeafsMania
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 291
Likes: 26
Quoting: MitchJr
That is a pile; what a joke trade for leafs 🤦🏻


I think if we move Mitch it has to be to a team that is in win now mode. To me that means a futures based package that we can use with cap space to aquire others. In essence it is trading Mitch + Liligren for Crouse, JT Miller, and the cap space to add Domi, Graves and have non-league min players on the 4th line.

The question is do we have to move him, which is a no. But it feels like running it back is not an option to my end and if we keep core 4 there are limited options.
Jun. 2, 2023 at 9:57 a.m.
#9
Thread Starter
LeafsMania
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 291
Likes: 26
Quoting: poeticentropy
SJ Murray trade. Remove 5th


Could do, I guess I feel there are a couple teams that could do that deal and so a team may be willing to add to it.
I removed the fifth but I think whether it is Ari, Ana, Chi, Det, or SJS, there are teams willing to eat Murray for the buyout cost to get a 1st in a good draft
Jun. 2, 2023 at 10:01 a.m.
#10
Thread Starter
LeafsMania
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 291
Likes: 26
Quoting: ecupirate07
why would Toronto accept that Marner deal?


A good question. Essentially it allows them to retool/reconfigure. The cap space and futures allows for a change and rebalancing of the roster. I feel this roster is stronger, faster, with more balanced goal scoring.
I wanted to see what it would look like this way.
Jun. 2, 2023 at 10:02 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 1,634
Likes: 531
Quoting: Leafsmania
Could do, I guess I feel there are a couple teams that could do that deal and so a team may be willing to add to it.
I removed the fifth but I think whether it is Ari, Ana, Chi, Det, or SJS, there are teams willing to eat Murray for the buyout cost to get a 1st in a good draft


Leafs are likely not getting a return on a Murray cap dump. He isn't Mrazek and SJ isn't CHI
Jun. 2, 2023 at 10:02 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 3,625
Likes: 1,222
Quoting: Leafsmania
I think if we move Mitch it has to be to a team that is in win now mode. To me that means a futures based package that we can use with cap space to aquire others. In essence it is trading Mitch + Liligren for Crouse, JT Miller, and the cap space to add Domi, Graves and have non-league min players on the 4th line.

The question is do we have to move him, which is a no. But it feels like running it back is not an option to my end and if we keep core 4 there are limited options.


I’ve heard this argument a lot - doesn’t hold water imo. Moving Mitch for futures is insane - no guarantee you’ll be able to flip this futures for an impact player, and almost guaranteed not a player at Mitch’s level. Why do you think coyotes would even move Crowse? Miller’s contract is toxic and Domi / Graves aren’t moving the needle - meh
Jun. 2, 2023 at 11:52 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
LeafsMania
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 291
Likes: 26
Quoting: poeticentropy
Leafs are likely not getting a return on a Murray cap dump. He isn't Mrazek and SJ isn't CHI


That is an interesting take. Why do you think the situation is different that the Mrazek trade?

I imagine the team would buy of Murray so a cap hit of 800,000 then 2 million so it will cost, but not a 1st alone. I would imagine there are a number of teams would be interested in getting another first round pick. I dont think SJS has many players to move that they can get decent picks for back (Karlsoon, Hertl...and maybe Coture if the retain). I see this is paying to help move forward on the rebuild.
Jun. 2, 2023 at 11:54 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
LeafsMania
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 291
Likes: 26
Quoting: MitchJr
I’ve heard this argument a lot - doesn’t hold water imo. Moving Mitch for futures is insane - no guarantee you’ll be able to flip this futures for an impact player, and almost guaranteed not a player at Mitch’s level. Why do you think coyotes would even move Crowse? Miller’s contract is toxic and Domi / Graves aren’t moving the needle - meh


Agreed, no guarantee. I think this move would be condition on the Leafs already having the other trades in place, a sort of one day earthquake of moves. I think Arizona would move Crouse as they get draft picks back and they are not in contention of winning and getting Muzzin allows them to stay at the same Cap number, with real $$$ savings.
Jun. 3, 2023 at 2:51 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 1,634
Likes: 531
Quoting: Leafsmania
That is an interesting take. Why do you think the situation is different that the Mrazek trade?

I imagine the team would buy of Murray so a cap hit of 800,000 then 2 million so it will cost, but not a 1st alone. I would imagine there are a number of teams would be interested in getting another first round pick. I dont think SJS has many players to move that they can get decent picks for back (Karlsoon, Hertl...and maybe Coture if the retain). I see this is paying to help move forward on the rebuild.


It's not an interesting take because SJ fans have been screaming it in a billion leafs ACGM having murray going to SJ. It's actually a very unoriginal take at this point. We're beating a dead horse.

Murray is worse with more uncertainty with his injuries. His contract also has more of a hit than Mrazek. Further CHI is not SJ meaning they are not in the same situations or operating the same.

SJ would be interested in taking Murray as a cap dump but they're not going to be sending additional valuable picks in the process. The most common one has been SJ's 2nd for BOS 1st, (to just move up in the draft like 9 spots...), which is not going to happen. The trade here being changed to CAR's 3rd for BOS's 1st seems fair, but before when it had a 5th on top going to TOR it was not fair nor realistic because SJ wouldn't be sending any straight up picks for Murray. Upgrading from a late 3rd to a late 1st though is reasonable to take on a Murray dump
Jun. 3, 2023 at 2:53 p.m.
#16
Birddog
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 1,161
Likes: 241
That Marner trade is really bad for the Leafs.
Jun. 3, 2023 at 9:47 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
LeafsMania
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 291
Likes: 26
Quoting: Newtown
That Marner trade is really bad for the Leafs.


I think the leafs lose any marner trade, so I would rather get futures and cap space to allow us to retool. In the end, it is not the best trade but I like how the team salary structure is more balanced now. I feel our bottom six has legit nhl players rather than more fringe guys.
Jun. 4, 2023 at 9:48 a.m.
#18
Birddog
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 1,161
Likes: 241
Quoting: Leafsmania
I think the leafs lose any marner trade, so I would rather get futures and cap space to allow us to retool. In the end, it is not the best trade but I like how the team salary structure is more balanced now. I feel our bottom six has legit nhl players rather than more fringe guys.


It’s been 56 years since they won a cup. Before Marner arrived they had missed the playoff 10 of 11 years, and hadn’t won a round in 19. Since, they have made the playoffs every year and advanced as far or further than all but 4 teams this year. I get it, it’s not a cup or ultimate success, but this team has been much much much better since Matthews and Marner arrived. Let’s stop blaming them for 56 years of losing and be patient. It took Ovi 13 years, Stamkos 12, MacKinnon 9 to win a cup.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll