Quoting: Caniac2000
Suzuki spearheaded the late season turnaround of the Wolves... what are you talking about he gets outscored? Are you genuinely trying to use +/-? Seriously?
I'm failing to see how Suzuki "spearheaded the late-season turnaround." His offense wasn't there compared to other Wolves' players; namely Ponomarev, Stromwall, and Rees down the stretch. His defense is not good. +/- isn't a great stat, but it does work in some instances. For example, Suzuki is -14, T-3rd worst on the team, and he's only had 3 power-play points, so there's no excuse that he's a PP Specialist. The average of the Chicago Wolves +/- is -2, and the median is -1. When you're more than 10 below the team average and median +/-, you're doing something very wrong.
Source: https://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/leagues/seasons/teams/0026742022.html
If you have any other metric you'd like to use to compare Hoglander and Suzuki, I'm all ears.
Quoting: Caniac2000
Beauviller is weak defensively. I watched the Canes beat him regularly as an Islander, he's not good. That's why the Isles were willing to move on from him. Defensively, he struggles. Take note of how Carolina don't touch defensive liability forwards.
Must have been the Isles' system, because Beavillier has been good on the Canucks.
Quoting: Caniac2000
What? Your argument is the fact Carolina has Aho, Kotkaniemi, Staal, Stastny, Drury already on the roster is proof Suzuki isn't good.... stop. Garbage take.
You just said that the center position was the area of weakness for the Canes. "Where could they use the extra help? Down the middle" - You literally just said that the Hurricanes want to improve at center, which should lend itself well to Suzuki getting a spot if he's so good. But he's not, as we've pointed out.
Quoting: Caniac2000
Suzuki EASILY has a higher ceiling. You seem to forget that Suzuki dropped in the draft because of an injury. He's got the ability to be a 2C. 2C or 2W... I'd much rather have Suzuki than Hoglander, and trying to say you'd rather have a guy who cannot crack one of the worst rosters in the NHL is just biased, stop.
Canucks don't have one of the worst forward groups. Their defense is horrendous, sure, but anyone who has actually watched Canuck hockey will tell you the forwards aren't the problem. Suzuki's draft was 4 years ago, you can't use an injury from four years ago as an excuse that Suzuki is going to be good someday. If it's been four years and he's still being affected by the injury, it means he's not going to be that player again, especially since he hasn't played a full season since being drafted. Suzuki hasn't shown offensive prowess in the AHL, 4 goals over the last 35 games of the season aren't exactly confidence inspiring, especially in a developmental league that one would hope to be graduating from next season. Meanwhile, he's been passed by other Cane centremen, namely Ponomarev, who has leapfrogged him in the lineup. You call me biased but you won't even accept your team's player for the bust that he's becoming.
Quoting: Caniac2000
Suzuki was also doing this on one of the worst teams in the AHL until he came back from his injury. You're trying to use point totals over 13 games to justify this? You need to rethink things here buddy, honestly.
You're literally the one who brought up the end of the season: "Suzuki was the only reason the Wolves got hot towards the end of the year and had a chance at the playoffs," So I pulled up the final games of the season, and (once more with feeling this time) he only had 8 points in 13 games.
Again, Only 4 goals in the final 35.
You made the claim, I proved your claim was false. That's not exactly hot by AHL standards, especially when his teammates were scoring at P/PG pace during that same stretch of time.