The value headed to Ottawa is probably 50% of Norris' value

Norris isn't going anywhere, value isnt trash but not available.

there's no way the Sharks are using their final retention spot on LaBanc

No thanks

-Just what Mike Grier wants to do: he'll retain $4M in a Karlsson trade, retain $1M on Labanc, and bring in Tyler Myers to fill in the RD depth chart. Why devote $11M in your cap space to the reigning Norris Trophy winner when you can give it to Tyler Myers instead??

-Why is a rebuilding Montreal team giving up a 3rd for a veteran in his walk year? Habs pass.

-Josh Norris had 35 goals in his last healthy season, is 24 years old, and is signed through the next 7 years (the rest of his presumed prime). Your offer for him includes: a C "prospect" who had 16 points in 68 GP last year; a goalie who put up .871/3.99 GAA last season; a 24 year old LHD who couldn't beat out Riley Stillman for playing time last year, and the last 2x$6.65M of a winger who might match Norris' scoring this year and next but that's about it. It's not the worst offer I've seen, but it's 100% a "quantity over quality" deal that only ever gets accepted by EA Sports.

None of those are worth the non-Canucks team considering.

Not even that, do you think there would be any interest in trading Norris for quantity and futures?

Plus, none of these pieces are even interesting for Ottawa outside of that 1st. Boeser would be ok offensively

Only Canucks player that would make sense for Ottawa to trade Norris would be in a trade for Elias Pettersson

No interest from montreal

No interest from montreal

No interest from montreal