SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

A Bit of Business

Created by: HockeyScotty
Team: 2023-24 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 19, 2023
Published: Jul. 19, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
With Josh Manson's injury history (and Cale Makar as well) we need to have a 3rd pair RD that is capable of playing up in the lineup for 30 games a season as well as complementing Bo Byram/Sam Girard in playing style in their regular pairings.

Looking around the league the only reasonably affordable options available in trade are: Andrew Peeke (Columbus), Jan Rutta (Pittsburgh), Dante Fabbro (Nashville).

The Free Agent market has dried up with Matt Dumba (too expensive), Tony DeAngelo (no defense), Ethan Bear (not healthy until December), and Cal Foote (needs work). I'm in favor of bringing in Foote but putting him in the AHL for a season or two to acclimate him to our style of play and bringing him up when Manson's contract is up as a physical presence (we have no other RHD of this type in our pipeline). While Sam Malinksi is an intriguing player we probably also need him to fill in due to injury as he brings a smooth offensive game; but I wouldn't want to bet the season on him as the 3rd pair; nor on Jack Johnson for the full seasons.

For the bottom 6, I'd like to target Zach Aston-Reese who would add to the grit and grind while actually bringing some "finish" (shooting percentage around 10%). Putting him on a line with Wood-Colton would definitely be a momentum changing line that would be fun to watch come playoffs.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$950,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$925,000
2$875,000
Trades
NSH
  1. MacDermid, Kurtis
  2. 2025 1st round pick (COL)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2025
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2026
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$83,500,000$83,312,500$637,500$0$187,500
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,125,000$6,125,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$12,600,000$12,600,000
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$825,000$825,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,000,000$4,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,250,000$9,250,000
RW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,000,000$4,000,000
C, LW
UFA - 4
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$825,000$825,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$950,000$950,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,050,000$1,050,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,850,000$3,850,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$775,000$775,000
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 6

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 19, 2023 at 10:14 a.m.
#1
Go Preds
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 450
Preds accept.
Jul. 19, 2023 at 10:17 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,584
Likes: 3,444
I'm not in favor of paying that much for a 6D. Bear is still a fine option, even if he can't play right away, and Foote is fine as well. Neither would result in losing a premium pock either.

Jokiharju is another potential option if exploring the trade market.
M96N29 and McRanteskog liked this.
Jul. 19, 2023 at 10:21 a.m.
#3
GO KNIGHTS GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 2,272
Alexandre Carrier is another option from Nashville. He’d probably only cost a 2nd, and I think he’s of a similar caliber as Fabbro — albeit with a lower ceiling. Perhaps more importantly, he’s got the same cap hit.
AEcho and Goorts liked this.
Jul. 19, 2023 at 10:30 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 955
Quoting: Jwilliams2k12
Preds accept.


How low would they go on Fabbro for a draft pick do you think? I thought about a 2nd rounder but he was a mid-first pick himself and has been a top 4 defender in the league for a number of years now. He is still under team control as an RFA as well.

I can't believe he isn't one of the most sought after trade options given his contract, being right-handed, and a good two-way player.
Jul. 19, 2023 at 10:31 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 955
Quoting: TheFastAndTheFleuryous
Alexandre Carrier is another option from Nashville. He’d probably only cost a 2nd, and I think he’s of a similar caliber as Fabbro — albeit with a lower ceiling. Perhaps more importantly, he’s got the same cap hit.


I assumed since they extended him that he fits in their future plans while Fabbro doesn't (lots of trade speculation since the deadline).
Jul. 19, 2023 at 10:32 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 955
Quoting: Anus_McLeod
I'm not in favor of paying that much for a 6D. Bear is still a fine option, even if he can't play right away, and Foote is fine as well. Neither would result in losing a premium pock either.

Jokiharju is another potential option if exploring the trade market.


Under this plan, I see Fabbro as the 2D when Manson's contract is up then we bring up Foote as the 3D.
Jul. 19, 2023 at 10:40 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 826
Likes: 436
Quoting: HockeyScotty
How low would they go on Fabbro for a draft pick do you think? I thought about a 2nd rounder but he was a mid-first pick himself and has been a top 4 defender in the league for a number of years now. He is still under team control as an RFA as well.

I can't believe he isn't one of the most sought after trade options given his contract, being right-handed, and a good two-way player.


There is some weird push from some NSH fans that say he isn't that good because he isn't the top D man to pair with Josi they thought he was, so some people might say a 2nd or 3rd, but realistically the lowest NSH would probably go, for a single pick, would be a high to mid 2nd round pick for Fabbro. Given where COL is likely to end up, a low first round pick is about right especially considering NSH needs to take on MacDermid to make the money work. As you said, he is a really solid 2-way D who is top 4 for most teams. NSH has just been blessed to be a D production powerhouse over the last 10-15 years and fans have grown accustom to it.
Jul. 19, 2023 at 10:54 a.m.
#8
Goorts
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 155
Likes: 91
Quoting: HockeyScotty
I assumed since they extended him that he fits in their future plans while Fabbro doesn't (lots of trade speculation since the deadline).


With the extension they gave him, it is more of a 'Prove It' year than anything being he'll now be a UFA after this season. Both Fabbro and Carrier have trade speculation around them as those 2, along with Lauzon... one of them starts the season as a scratch.

Quoting: AEcho
There is some weird push from some NSH fans that say he isn't that good because he isn't the top D man to pair with Josi they thought he was, so some people might say a 2nd or 3rd, but realistically the lowest NSH would probably go, for a single pick, would be a high to mid 2nd round pick for Fabbro. Given where COL is likely to end up, a low first round pick is about right especially considering NSH needs to take on MacDermid to make the money work. As you said, he is a really solid 2-way D who is top 4 for most teams. NSH has just been blessed to be a D production powerhouse over the last 10-15 years and fans have grown accustom to it.


This is pretty spot on for the value of Fabbro in my eyes. Being an RFA still provides some control to a team who acquires him. I would say Carrier's value would be 1 round less. Mid-Low 2nd round or high 3rd.

But as it goes for either player, once the season starts and they do show the upside that they supposedly have, the values will only go up.
Jwilliams2k12 liked this.
Jul. 19, 2023 at 10:58 a.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 955
Quoting: Goorts
With the extension they gave him, it is more of a 'Prove It' year than anything being he'll now be a UFA after this season. Both Fabbro and Carrier have trade speculation around them as those 2, along with Lauzon... one of them starts the season as a scratch.

This is pretty spot on for the value of Fabbro in my eyes. Being an RFA still provides some control to a team who acquires him. I would say Carrier's value would be 1 round less. Mid-Low 2nd round or high 3rd.

But as it goes for either player, once the season starts and they do show the upside that they supposedly have, the values will only go up.


Seems like a crowded blueline however with Barrie and Schenn; not enough ice time to go around. Certainly playoff teams will throw first rounders out at the deadline like candy at a parade; which is why I'd rather the Avs move now and not overspend.
Jul. 19, 2023 at 11:54 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 3,338
Likes: 1,857
Quoting: Jwilliams2k12
Preds accept.


Personally id pass. A 1st in 2025 (2 drafts away) that is likely to be in the 20s. Is this really going to be better than what we have in Fabbro?
Jul. 19, 2023 at 12:45 p.m.
#11
Go Preds
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 450
Quoting: herzausstein
Personally id pass. A 1st in 2025 (2 drafts away) that is likely to be in the 20s. Is this really going to be better than what we have in Fabbro?


Considering we have Livingstone and Carrier and Lauzon all fighting with Fabbro for the last 2 D spots we can afford to move him for a 1st which can be packaged in with another deal because in 2025 Nashville would have 3 1sts.
Jul. 19, 2023 at 12:56 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 3,338
Likes: 1,857
Quoting: Jwilliams2k12
Considering we have Livingstone and Carrier and Lauzon all fighting with Fabbro for the last 2 D spots we can afford to move him for a 1st which can be packaged in with another deal because in 2025 Nashville would have 3 1sts.


Personally, id trade carrier due to injury history and age, lauzon because he can be replaced by stastney, and barrie can be replaced by Livingstone. Fabbro has the higher ceiling than any of the aforementioned players.
Jul. 19, 2023 at 12:57 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 955
Quoting: herzausstein
Personally, id trade carrier due to injury history and age, lauzon because he can be replaced by stastney, and barrie can be replaced by Livingstone. Fabbro has the higher ceiling than any of the aforementioned players.


Which is why he is interesting to other teams and more valuable
Jul. 19, 2023 at 6:35 p.m.
#14
RETIRED
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 2,481
COL shouldn’t do this deal.
Trading a 1st round pick for the luxury of having another extra D option is bad asset management.

Should one of Toews-Makar or Byram-Manson get hurt, Girard moves up and J Johnson, MacDermid or Hunt slots in. I bet you forgot Hunt even existed for a moment there.

Any combination of 4 out of the following 5 D is a top end Top 4 regardless how you mix them up Toews/Makar/Byram/Girard/ Manson
Jul. 19, 2023 at 6:50 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 955
Quoting: McRanteskog
COL shouldn’t do this deal.
Trading a 1st round pick for the luxury of having another extra D option is bad asset management.

Should one of Toews-Makar or Byram-Manson get hurt, Girard moves up and J Johnson, MacDermid or Hunt slots in. I bet you forgot Hunt even existed for a moment there.

Any combination of 4 out of the following 5 D is a top end Top 4 regardless how you mix them up Toews/Makar/Byram/Girard/ Manson


Nope didn't forget Hunt just don't think much of his game and I wanted to create a way for us to keep Toews while moving on from Manson without hurting our top 4/5 in the process. Fabbro is good and cheap. We will have Manson at $4.5 million when he is 35 years old; it just won't age well the way he plays but if we move him now or next year there is a huge hole that is left behind.
Jul. 19, 2023 at 6:59 p.m.
#16
RETIRED
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 2,481
Quoting: HockeyScotty
Nope didn't forget Hunt just don't think much of his game and I wanted to create a way for us to keep Toews while moving on from Manson without hurting our top 4/5 in the process. Fabbro is good and cheap. We will have Manson at $4.5 million when he is 35 years old; it just won't age well the way he plays but if we move him now or next year there is a huge hole that is left behind.


If after next season COL trades Manson and somehow resigns Toews (I am adamant that unless he takes a generous “hometown” discount, we can’t afford), the D for the 24-25 season becomes:

Toews-Makar
Byram-Girard
(Two of) Aamodt/Malinski/Ahcan/Behrens/Hanzel or UFA signing

Completely respectable and they maintain their 1st rd pick to continue stocking their very very very empty cupboards
Jul. 19, 2023 at 7:14 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 406
Quoting: McRanteskog
If after next season COL trades Manson and somehow resigns Toews (I am adamant that unless he takes a generous “hometown” discount, we can’t afford), the D for the 24-25 season becomes:

Toews-Makar
Byram-Girard
(Two of) Aamodt/Malinski/Ahcan/Behrens/Hanzel or UFA signing

Completely respectable and they maintain their 1st rd pick to continue stocking their very very very empty cupboards


I'd sign foote this season and then have malinski be on 3rd pair
Toews makar
Byram girard
Foote malinski/behrens
Jul. 19, 2023 at 7:17 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 406
Quoting: HockeyScotty
I assumed since they extended him that he fits in their future plans while Fabbro doesn't (lots of trade speculation since the deadline).


I would trade 3rd and macdermid for fabbro. You shed some cap while opening a roster spot for the young guys.
However I hate trading an enforcer to a rival.

Sadly I don't think they resign toews unless for whatever reason landeskog can't play next year either then they can resign toews
Jul. 19, 2023 at 7:32 p.m.
#19
RETIRED
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 2,481
Quoting: Cub19
I'd sign foote this season and then have malinski be on 3rd pair
Toews makar
Byram girard
Foote malinski/behrens


I am of the mindset that every spare dollar should be spent on the best possible 3RW player.

Drouin-MacKinnon-Rantanen
Lehkonen-Johanson-Nichushkin
Wood-Colton-XXXXX
Cogliano-Meyers or AHLer-LOC
(Olofsson)

Toews-Makar
Byram-Manson
Johnson-Girard
(MacDermid, Hunt)

The 3RW is a much higher priority signing than adding to the #6-7D spot
Jul. 19, 2023 at 7:43 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 406
Quoting: McRanteskog
I am of the mindset that every spare dollar should be spent on the best possible 3RW player.

Drouin-MacKinnon-Rantanen
Lehkonen-Johanson-Nichushkin
Wood-Colton-XXXXX
Cogliano-Meyers or AHLer-LOC
(Olofsson)

Toews-Makar
Byram-Manson
Johnson-Girard
(MacDermid, Hunt)

The 3RW is a much higher priority signing than adding to the #6-7D spot


They can easily bury macdermid and still sign foote and a 3rd line winger.
Jul. 19, 2023 at 8:17 p.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 955
Quoting: McRanteskog
If after next season COL trades Manson and somehow resigns Toews (I am adamant that unless he takes a generous “hometown” discount, we can’t afford), the D for the 24-25 season becomes:

Toews-Makar
Byram-Girard
(Two of) Aamodt/Malinski/Ahcan/Behrens/Hanzel or UFA signing

Completely respectable and they maintain their 1st rd pick to continue stocking their very very very empty cupboards


I disagree about putting Girard on his offhand. Yes he can "do it" but it was his worst performance for the Avs
Jul. 19, 2023 at 8:32 p.m.
#22
RETIRED
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 2,481
Quoting: HockeyScotty
I disagree about putting Girard on his offhand. Yes he can "do it" but it was his worst performance for the Avs


My guy, Girard has predominantly played his offhand his entire COL tenure. Where have you been lol
Jul. 20, 2023 at 9:13 a.m.
#23
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 955
Quoting: McRanteskog
My guy, Girard has predominantly played his offhand his entire COL tenure. Where have you been lol


He has played there whenever injuries force the need to do so. Last year especially with Manson (and Makar) missing games he moved over; just like he did in the past. When fully healthy he does NOT normally play on the right side. My point was that he is BETTER on his natural LEFT side.
Jul. 20, 2023 at 9:14 a.m.
#24
RETIRED
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 2,481
Quoting: HockeyScotty
He has played there whenever injuries force the need to do so. Last year especially with Manson (and Makar) missing games he moved over; just like he did in the past. When fully healthy he does NOT normally play on the right side. My point was that he is BETTER on his natural LEFT side.


Provide me statistical evidence that demonstrates he’s noticeably better on his left than right
Jul. 20, 2023 at 9:47 a.m.
#25
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 955
Quoting: McRanteskog
Provide me statistical evidence that demonstrates he’s noticeably better on his left than right


If there were any publicly available TOI and defensive pairings that show L/R alignment I would gladly post it (right or wrong); but I can't find any.

Best I could find was moneypuck.com/lines which just shows pairings but not actual positions by D.

2022-23 Girard played 39% of his time on a L/R pairing and 61% L/L (majority with Toews and Byram as partners). These were pretty much the playoff pairings as well due to Manson being out.
2021-22 Girard played 46% of his time on a L/R pairing and 54% L/L (Jack Johnson, Toews and Byram). However, for the short duration of the playoffs before he broke his sternum it was 88% in a L/R pair (Manson).

Toews and Jack Johnson have also played a good amount of time at RD so we can't say that 100% of the L/L pairings involving Girard have him as the RD.

The numbers are higher than I expected but the Avs lack of quality (and healthy) top 4 RD certainly affects this as well. Based on the normal pairings when fully healthy during the past 2 years and the start of the playoffs during the cup run:
Toews-Makar
Girard-Manson
Byram-EJ

I would say that it proves he is "best" on his left side.

I wish the tracking data would show their LD/RD positions as it does LW/RW so we could see actual analytics for their performance but I can't find any yet.
McRanteskog liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll