SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

C Option

Created by: Taz
Team: 2023-24 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 25, 2023
Published: Jul. 25, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,000,000
4$4,000,000
Trades
1.
BOS
  1. Henrique, Adam ($2,825,000 retained)
ANA
  1. Forbort, Derek
  2. Poitras, Matthew
  3. 2024 4th round pick (BOS)
2.
BOS
    Michael Backlund (50% retained)
    CGY
      Similar package as A. Henrique trade.
      3.
      BOS
        Jack Roslovic
        CBJ
          Matt Grzelcyk
          Buyouts
          DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
          2024
          Logo of the BOS
          Logo of the BOS
          2025
          Logo of the BOS
          Logo of the BOS
          Logo of the BOS
          Logo of the BOS
          Logo of the BOS
          2026
          Logo of the BOS
          Logo of the BOS
          Logo of the BOS
          Logo of the BOS
          Logo of the BOS
          Logo of the BOS
          Logo of the BOS
          ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
          22$83,500,000$78,914,584$4,500,000$500,000$4,585,416
          Left WingCentreRight Wing
          Logo of the Boston Bruins
          $6,125,000$6,125,000
          LW
          M-NTC
          UFA - 2
          Logo of the Boston Bruins
          $4,750,000$4,750,000
          C, LW
          M-NTC
          UFA - 4
          Logo of the Boston Bruins
          $4,000,000$4,000,000
          RW, LW
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the Boston Bruins
          $1,000,000$1,000,000
          LW, RW
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the Boston Bruins
          $5,250,000$5,250,000
          C, RW
          M-NTC, NMC
          UFA - 3
          Logo of the Boston Bruins
          $11,250,000$11,250,000
          RW
          NMC
          UFA - 8
          Logo of the Boston Bruins
          $775,000$775,000
          C, LW
          RFA - 1
          Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
          -$1,368,750-$1,368,750
          LW, C
          M-NTC
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the Boston Bruins
          $2,000,000$2,000,000
          LW, RW
          UFA - 2
          Logo of the Boston Bruins
          $1,000,000$1,000,000 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
          LW, RW
          NMC
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the Boston Bruins
          $2,000,000$2,000,000
          C, RW
          RFA - 2
          Logo of the Boston Bruins
          $787,500$787,500
          LW, RW
          RFA - 2
          Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
          Logo of the Boston Bruins
          $6,500,000$6,500,000
          LD
          NTC, NMC
          UFA - 7
          Logo of the Boston Bruins
          $9,500,000$9,500,000
          RD
          UFA - 7
          Logo of the Boston Bruins
          $5,000,000$5,000,000
          G
          M-NTC
          UFA - 2
          Logo of the Boston Bruins
          $3,687,500$3,687,500
          LD
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the Boston Bruins
          $4,100,000$4,100,000
          RD
          M-NTC
          UFA - 4
          Logo of the Boston Bruins
          $4,000,000$4,000,000
          G
          RFA - 1
          Logo of the Boston Bruins
          $1,137,500$1,137,500
          LD/RD
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the Boston Bruins
          $1,050,000$1,050,000
          RD
          UFA - 1
          ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
          Logo of the Boston Bruins
          $762,500$762,500
          RW, LW
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the Boston Bruins
          $775,000$775,000
          RD
          RFA - 1

          Embed Code

          • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
          • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

          Text-Embed

          Click to Highlight
          Jul. 25, 2023 at 11:59 a.m.
          #1
          LBS
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Jun. 2023
          Posts: 1,529
          Likes: 562
          I'm going to ignore the other trades.

          You'd need to give more up for Henrique + retention IMO but, I think he'd be a good fit in Boston and I haven't really seen people suggest him before, congrats for thinking outside the box!
          Taz liked this.
          Jul. 25, 2023 at 12:03 p.m.
          #2
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Jun. 2019
          Posts: 38,666
          Likes: 19,763
          Quoting: lowblocksniper
          I'm going to ignore the other trades.

          You'd need to give more up for Henrique + retention IMO but, I think he'd be a good fit in Boston and I haven't really seen people suggest him before, congrats for thinking outside the box!


          Backlund would also cost more. Taking on Forbort coats assets and Poitras is a B prospect
          Jul. 25, 2023 at 12:05 p.m.
          #3
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Jul. 2023
          Posts: 37
          Likes: 9
          Ducks say no. 50% retained on henrique takes more than a fourth. Forbort blocks the LDs Ducks are trying to develop.
          Jul. 25, 2023 at 12:09 p.m.
          #4
          LBS
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Jun. 2023
          Posts: 1,529
          Likes: 562
          Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
          Backlund would also cost more. Taking on Forbort coats assets and Poitras is a B prospect


          Yeah Backlund plus rentention is a 1st round pick at least
          Jul. 25, 2023 at 12:12 p.m.
          #5
          LBS
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Jun. 2023
          Posts: 1,529
          Likes: 562
          Quoting: CarlssonSzn
          Ducks say no. 50% retained on henrique takes more than a fourth. Forbort blocks the LDs Ducks are trying to develop.


          I agree the trade is missing assets from Boston but, for 1yr, considering D take more time to develop I wouldn't say Forbort would be blocking anybody, Fowler went straight to the NHL but, it won't hurt any prospects to play a season in the AHL
          Taz liked this.
          Jul. 25, 2023 at 12:15 p.m.
          #6
          Thread Starter
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Jun. 2017
          Posts: 1,799
          Likes: 483
          Quoting: lowblocksniper
          I'm going to ignore the other trades.

          You'd need to give more up for Henrique + retention IMO but, I think he'd be a good fit in Boston and I haven't really seen people suggest him before, congrats for thinking outside the box!


          Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
          Backlund would also cost more. Taking on Forbort coats assets and Poitras is a B prospect


          Quoting: CarlssonSzn
          Ducks say no. 50% retained on henrique takes more than a fourth. Forbort blocks the LDs Ducks are trying to develop.


          Thanks for your comments. I'm not a bruins fan so I don't really know about their prospect depht chart. I think Lysell might be the only prospect they would not offer for a rental. Who else could bruins add to make a deal fair?

          CarlssonSzn, from what I read on different ducks threads is that they were poor in defense and would benefit a stop gap for their young guys. I see Jackson Lacombe on a lot of ducks fans top 4, I mean the guy might be ready for NHL minutes but you really think he can handle a top 4 role immediately? Forbort is not an elite dman we all know that, but he got enough experience to play those minutes, and he can be a TDL selling option, and if not, he likely will walk in free agent market. You're probably right that the offer is too poor, but I think Forbort could fit with the ducks, take off pressure on young defensemen and let them enough time to developp, they can overtake Forbort when they'll be ready somehow during the year.
          lowblocksniper and CarlssonSzn liked this.
          Jul. 25, 2023 at 12:38 p.m.
          #7
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Jul. 2023
          Posts: 37
          Likes: 9
          Quoting: Taz
          CarlssonSzn, from what I read on different ducks threads is that they were poor in defense and would benefit a stop gap for their young guys. I see Jackson Lacombe on a lot of ducks fans top 4, I mean the guy might be ready for NHL minutes but you really think he can handle a top 4 role immediately? Forbort is not an elite dman we all know that, but he got enough experience to play those minutes, and he can be a TDL selling option, and if not, he likely will walk in free agent market. You're probably right that the offer is too poor, but I think Forbort could fit with the ducks, take off pressure on young defensemen and let them enough time to developp, they can overtake Forbort when they'll be ready somehow during the year.


          Idk why people have Lacombe in their top 4, he doesn't really project that high. One of Zellweger/Mintyukov are expected to make the roster out of camp and play top 4 minutes alongside Gudas. We got Zellweger, Mintyukov, Hagg, Lacombe, Vaakanainen all competing for two spots on the left side already. There's no need for Forbort unless it's a cap dump and Ducks are getting a nice sweetener.
          Jul. 25, 2023 at 12:42 p.m.
          #8
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Jun. 2022
          Posts: 1,046
          Likes: 741
          Quoting: Taz
          that the offer is too poor, but I think Forbort could fit with the ducks, take off pressure on young defensemen and let them enough time to developp,


          A lot of Ducks fans would be happy to have Forbort at the cost of like a 4th or 5th round pick. The Bruins cap situation doesn't give them a lot of leverage in a Forbort trade.

          Henrique 50% retained should get a 2nd round pick plus a decent but not great prospect. That makes it really hard for the Bruins because they already traded both 2nd's from 2024 and 2025. I don't see a pick in 2026 having great appeal.
          Taz liked this.
          Jul. 25, 2023 at 1:02 p.m.
          #9
          not a he )
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Apr. 2022
          Posts: 3,299
          Likes: 4,560
          Depending on how training camp goes with regard to Laine, I could see Roslovic for Gryz working for both sides. The cap hits are nearly identical, Roslovic would get the opportunity to play center which he prefers (which is starting to look unlikely in Columbus with Fantilli on board and if Laine can in fact play center). Jackets need a stable 3LD who can play higher if Werenski gets hurt again who doesn't have term that will block the prospects next season.
          Taz liked this.
          Jul. 25, 2023 at 3:36 p.m.
          #10
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Jun. 2021
          Posts: 15,679
          Likes: 12,057
          Quoting: CarlssonSzn
          Ducks say no. 50% retained on henrique takes more than a fourth. Forbort blocks the LDs Ducks are trying to develop.


          No we take Forbort this year for free to play with Drysdale but like you said about Rico, no shot
          Taz liked this.
          Jul. 25, 2023 at 4:02 p.m.
          #11
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Mar. 2019
          Posts: 1,705
          Likes: 888
          Quoting: squashmaple
          Depending on how training camp goes with regard to Laine, I could see Roslovic for Gryz working for both sides. The cap hits are nearly identical, Roslovic would get the opportunity to play center which he prefers (which is starting to look unlikely in Columbus with Fantilli on board and if Laine can in fact play center). Jackets need a stable 3LD who can play higher if Werenski gets hurt again who doesn't have term that will block the prospects next season.


          However, it DOES mean you're either committing to letting Grizz walk in the next offseason (or trading him at the deadline), OR trading Provorov at either of those points. Because at least one of Mateychuk/Svozil will be ready by the start of 2024-25.
           
          Reply
          To create a post please Login or Register
          Question:
          Options:
          Add Option
          Submit Poll