SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Big moves by Leafs

Created by: Plywood25
Team: 2023-24 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 24, 2023
Published: Jul. 31, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
8$8,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$975,000
1$975,000
1$975,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Tracey, Brayden
  2. Vaakanainen, Urho
  3. Zegras, Trevor [RFA Rights]
  4. 2024 1st round pick (ANA)
  5. 2025 1st round pick (ANA)
2.
TOR
  1. Texier, Alexandre
  2. 2024 1st round pick (CBJ)
  3. 2025 2nd round pick (CBJ)
3.
TOR
  1. 2024 2nd round pick (FLA)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
2025
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2026
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$72,454,667$0$0$11,045,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 1
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,525,000$1,525,000
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
$975,000$975,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$863,333$863,333
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,150,000$1,150,000
RW, C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,400,000$2,400,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RW
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$7,500,000$7,500,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,550,000$3,550,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,150,000$4,150,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$766,667$766,667
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,400,000$1,400,000
RD
RFA - 1
$975,000$975,000
G
UFA
$975,000$975,000
RD
UFA
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,100,000$1,100,000
RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$796,667$796,667
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,687,500$4,687,500
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 31, 2023 at 10:07 a.m.
#1
Josh Anderson Sucks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 4,842
Likes: 2,025
Why would Anaheim do this. If Matthews is gonna leave Toronto, the Leafs won’t get back an elite young player. No team is gonna do that AND add two firsts.
Jul. 31, 2023 at 10:08 a.m.
#2
Rip
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 11,680
Likes: 3,108
Quoting: Kyle_Okposo_Lover
Why would Anaheim do this. If Matthews is gonna leave Toronto, the Leafs won’t get back an elite young player. No team is gonna do that AND add two firsts.


Totally, why would anyone want a top 3 player in the world.
Herb_Brooks and KeepUps15 liked this.
Jul. 31, 2023 at 10:13 a.m.
#3
Josh Anderson Sucks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 4,842
Likes: 2,025
Quoting: RipNasty
Totally, why would anyone want a top 3 player in the world.


Why would anyone want an expiring UFA without a contract extension by giving up an elite, proven player, two potential top 5-10 picks and two solid prospects? It makes no sense. If that said he came with a 8x13.25 extension then sure but without one makes no sense.
Indy liked this.
Jul. 31, 2023 at 10:15 a.m.
#4
Rip
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 11,680
Likes: 3,108
Quoting: Kyle_Okposo_Lover
Why would anyone want an expiring UFA without a contract extension by giving up an elite, proven player, two potential top 5-10 picks and two solid prospects? It makes no sense. If that said he came with a 8x13.25 extension then sure but without one makes no sense.


Oh right, I keep forgetting that no one is allowed to sign Matthews or any other leaf unless it's as an FA. I keep forgetting that rule
KeepUps15 liked this.
Jul. 31, 2023 at 10:16 a.m.
#5
Rip
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 11,680
Likes: 3,108
Quoting: Kyle_Okposo_Lover
Why would anyone want an expiring UFA without a contract extension by giving up an elite, proven player, two potential top 5-10 picks and two solid prospects? It makes no sense. If that said he came with a 8x13.25 extension then sure but without one makes no sense.


Also if a 2 time 20 goal scoring 60 point winger is a proven elite player, what does that make Nylander?
Jul. 31, 2023 at 10:17 a.m.
#6
Josh Anderson Sucks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 4,842
Likes: 2,025
Quoting: RipNasty
Oh right, I keep forgetting that no one is allowed to sign Matthews or any other leaf unless it's as an FA. I keep forgetting that rule

No reason for that attitude bro. I like to have friendly conversations.

This doesn’t say there’s an extension in place. It doesn’t say he wants to stay in Anaheim and will negotiate once traded. So I’m not gonna assume anything. Normally on here people say extension in place because that adds to the value.

i go 100% off of what it says here. Relax
Indy liked this.
Jul. 31, 2023 at 10:22 a.m.
#7
Indy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 381
Likes: 293
Quoting: Kyle_Okposo_Lover
No reason for that attitude bro. I like to have friendly conversations.

This doesn’t say there’s an extension in place. It doesn’t say he wants to stay in Anaheim and will negotiate once traded. So I’m not gonna assume anything. Normally on here people say extension in place because that adds to the value.

i go 100% off of what it says here. Relax

It's also just good asset management. Lets be honest here the ducks are not going to go on a deep playoff run right now while they are trying to get out of a rebuild. Why burn off several key prospects of one year of a great player with no commitment of retainment. Its just a problem here on this board, and with some teams more so than others, they just view others as feeder teams to their franchises.
Kyle_Okposo_Lover liked this.
Jul. 31, 2023 at 11:00 a.m.
#8
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,794
Likes: 22,822
All three non Leaf teams easy say no. Brodie's and Jarnkrok's M NTC say no.
Jul. 31, 2023 at 11:35 a.m.
#9
Rip
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 11,680
Likes: 3,108
Quoting: Kyle_Okposo_Lover
No reason for that attitude bro. I like to have friendly conversations.

This doesn’t say there’s an extension in place. It doesn’t say he wants to stay in Anaheim and will negotiate once traded. So I’m not gonna assume anything. Normally on here people say extension in place because that adds to the value.

i go 100% off of what it says here. Relax


No one is trading for Matthews without an extension in place. This is beyond obvious.
Jul. 31, 2023 at 11:38 a.m.
#10
Josh Anderson Sucks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 4,842
Likes: 2,025
Quoting: RipNasty
No one is trading for Matthews without an extension in place. This is beyond obvious.


There’s absolutely no reason to have an attitude bro. I’m trying to have a real conversation.

It’s not “obvious”. If it’s obvious then why did 90% of the Matthews deals I see state there’s an extension in place? They wouldn’t say that if it was obvious.

It’s not like he requested a trade and said he will sign with the team. Like what
Jul. 31, 2023 at 11:49 a.m.
#11
not a he )
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 3,231
Likes: 4,406
Quoting: Kyle_Okposo_Lover
There’s absolutely no reason to have an attitude bro. I’m trying to have a real conversation.

It’s not “obvious”. If it’s obvious then why did 90% of the Matthews deals I see state there’s an extension in place? They wouldn’t say that if it was obvious.

It’s not like he requested a trade and said he will sign with the team. Like what


That guy's a well-named troll. There's no having a "real conversation" with them.
Kyle_Okposo_Lover and benjgc liked this.
Jul. 31, 2023 at 12:03 p.m.
#12
Rip
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 11,680
Likes: 3,108
Quoting: Kyle_Okposo_Lover
There’s absolutely no reason to have an attitude bro. I’m trying to have a real conversation.

It’s not “obvious”. If it’s obvious then why did 90% of the Matthews deals I see state there’s an extension in place? They wouldn’t say that if it was obvious.

It’s not like he requested a trade and said he will sign with the team. Like what


Sure bud
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll