SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Leafs All-in

Created by: Sjohns8888
Team: 2023-24 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 1, 2023
Published: Aug. 1, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Would have to pay a premium to get lindholm 50% retained
NHL ready top 4 D
Leafs top 2 prospects
1st

Might be an overpay but this move allows Tavares to slide over to the wing and you replace him with a premier two way C.

Still have depth in the farm system to make a move or two at the deadline if you want to fortify the bottom D pairing.
Free Agent Signings
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$775,000
Trades
1.
PHI
  1. Järnkrok, Calle
  2. 2024 4th round pick (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Lindholm, Elias ($2,425,000 retained)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
2025
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2026
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$83,500,000$83,372,283$0$0$127,717
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,425,000$2,425,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,400,000$2,400,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,150,000$1,150,000
RW, C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RW
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$7,500,000$7,500,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,550,000$3,550,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,150,000$4,150,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$766,667$766,667
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$775,000$775,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,687,500$4,687,500
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 1, 2023 at 8:14 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,792
Likes: 19,847
Calgary will almost certainly get an offer with higher quality
Aug. 1, 2023 at 8:22 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 329
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Calgary will almost certainly get an offer with higher quality


Its funny that for Nylander people cry hes a rental and not worth anything but somehow Lindhome is worth more than 4 quality pieces
Aug. 1, 2023 at 8:24 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 1,230
‘Might be an overpay’ 🤦🏻. Absolutely way too much (4 premium assets) for rental C that doesn’t drive his own line. Unless he’s playing with superstars, he puts up 50-60 points.
Aug. 1, 2023 at 8:46 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,792
Likes: 19,847
Quoting: kous
Its funny that for Nylander people cry hes a rental and not worth anything but somehow Lindhome is worth more than 4 quality pieces


I never said Nylander is not worth anything. I would say him and Lindholm have very similar value. The issue with the trade is it's quantity not quality. A player like Lindholm or Nylander should absolutely return a 1st and a top 50 prospect, and probably some sort of lesser additions after that. The value is certainly there in a vacuum but it lacks a top end prospect.

For example would you trade Nylander at 50% for Del Bel Belluz + Ceulemans + Boqvist + protected 1st?
Aug. 1, 2023 at 8:53 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,792
Likes: 19,847
Quoting: MitchJr
‘Might be an overpay’ 🤦🏻. Absolutely way too much (4 premium assets) for rental C that doesn’t drive his own line. Unless he’s playing with superstars, he puts up 50-60 points.


rose coloured glasses much? 4 premium assets is quite a way to describe a B level prospect, a B+ level prospect, 2nd pairing defenseman and a late 1st. Also complete disrespect on Lindholm, sure he is not an offensive play driver but he is an incredible 2-way supporting player. Bergeron and prime Toews were the ultimate example of this type of player, Couturier (before he got hurt) and Kopitar are other great examples of a player that does a lot of the dirty work to allow others to succeed so well offensively
Aug. 1, 2023 at 9:06 a.m.
#6
Rip
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 11,921
Likes: 3,163
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
rose coloured glasses much? 4 premium assets is quite a way to describe a B level prospect, a B+ level prospect, 2nd pairing defenseman and a late 1st. Also complete disrespect on Lindholm, sure he is not an offensive play driver but he is an incredible 2-way supporting player. Bergeron and prime Toews were the ultimate example of this type of player, Couturier (before he got hurt) and Kopitar are other great examples of a player that does a lot of the dirty work to allow others to succeed so well offensively


Niemela was named the top defenceman at the world Juniors. Go look at the last 25 players to do so and then say he's a b prospect. Liljegren is already a top 4 defenceman and is only 24. Minten is also much better than a B prospect. It's very clear you hate the Leafs with takes like these.
Aug. 1, 2023 at 9:20 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 329
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I never said Nylander is not worth anything. I would say him and Lindholm have very similar value. The issue with the trade is it's quantity not quality. A player like Lindholm or Nylander should absolutely return a 1st and a top 50 prospect, and probably some sort of lesser additions after that. The value is certainly there in a vacuum but it lacks a top end prospect.

For example would you trade Nylander at 50% for Del Bel Belluz + Ceulemans + Boqvist + protected 1st?


I was not saying you but the site in general.
Aug. 1, 2023 at 9:41 a.m.
#8
Danny B is here
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 5,063
Likes: 1,969
Flyers probably accept
Aug. 1, 2023 at 9:44 a.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 87
Likes: 16
Quoting: MitchJr
‘Might be an overpay’ 🤦🏻. Absolutely way too much (4 premium assets) for rental C that doesn’t drive his own line. Unless he’s playing with superstars, he puts up 50-60 points.


Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
rose coloured glasses much? 4 premium assets is quite a way to describe a B level prospect, a B+ level prospect, 2nd pairing defenseman and a late 1st. Also complete disrespect on Lindholm, sure he is not an offensive play driver but he is an incredible 2-way supporting player. Bergeron and prime Toews were the ultimate example of this type of player, Couturier (before he got hurt) and Kopitar are other great examples of a player that does a lot of the dirty work to allow others to succeed so well offensively


I see it from both sides here but that’s why I mentioned above. It is a lot to give up but lindholm is a premier 2-way C. He was a Selke candidate in 21-22 and is a season removed from 40 goals. Yes he was playing with premier talent but he would also be in Toronto. We have a ton of scoring talent already but adding his defensive abilities would put this team over the top.

Lilly is the big “top 50” prospect you’d be referring to as he is a former 1st round pick and is already a top 4 dman at the age of 24 (on a great contract). Niemela is an A- prospect (size is probably the only question for him at the NHL level), Minten is probably a B prospect at this point and a late 1st (what you would get from any team acquiring him). This is a great return for him and as mentioned above is probably an over pay but for a top tier player like lindholm at 50% retained, that is most likely the cost.

He has similar value to nylander and if the leafs were shipping him out for futures that is the kind of package I would want in return.
Aug. 1, 2023 at 10:09 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 566
Likes: 159
Flyers all out if the return on Seeler is a 4th and Jankrok
Aug. 1, 2023 at 10:46 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,792
Likes: 19,847
Quoting: Sjohns8888
I see it from both sides here but that’s why I mentioned above. It is a lot to give up but lindholm is a premier 2-way C. He was a Selke candidate in 21-22 and is a season removed from 40 goals. Yes he was playing with premier talent but he would also be in Toronto. We have a ton of scoring talent already but adding his defensive abilities would put this team over the top.

Lilly is the big “top 50” prospect you’d be referring to as he is a former 1st round pick and is already a top 4 dman at the age of 24 (on a great contract). Niemela is an A- prospect (size is probably the only question for him at the NHL level), Minten is probably a B prospect at this point and a late 1st (what you would get from any team acquiring him). This is a great return for him and as mentioned above is probably an over pay but for a top tier player like lindholm at 50% retained, that is most likely the cost.

He has similar value to nylander and if the leafs were shipping him out for futures that is the kind of package I would want in return.


To each their own. I think you are overvaluing your prospects and Liljegren a bit much here. Maybe I need a better example.
IMO this would essentially be the same as me offering
Dube (equivalent to Liljegren)
Poirier (bit more valuable than Neimela)
Ronni (bit less valuable than Minten)
1st
For
Nylander (50%)

Again I don't think the overall sum of parts is bad, it just lacks that grade A quality piece than 2 lesser pieces.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll