SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Grabbing the low hanging fruit

Created by: GiggywithGibby
Team: 2023-24 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 2, 2023
Published: Aug. 2, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Loosing Lundestrom for half the season hurts, but it does open some options up to pick up some decent players from teams who are not cap compliant.

Defense is certainly tighter than last season. Additions of Gudas and Hagg were good, I think adding Rutta would continue to help protect the goalies. I really don't like putting Drysdale and Fowler in the same line, but short of getting a true 1LD to push Fowler down to 2nd pairing with Gudas, I don't see another path forward. I just think that first pairing is going to get bounced around too much, neither of them are physical, and Drysdale doesn't even have the size advantage of Fowler.

Jarnkrok is a bit undersized, but has good IQ and a good 200ft game. As a bottom 6/9 utility knife he'd be useful to have around, notably to play 3RW after Sold has departed.

I think LaCombe gets a year to show off what he has at the NHL level while the other guys get some pro experience in San Diego. Leo probably plays there too. Might want to look at picking up a goalie with a year left and let Dostal try for a Calder?
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
8$8,000,000
2$2,000,000
Trades
1.
ANA
  1. Rutta, Jan
Additional Details:
Between offloading Rutta and sending a goalie down, the pens are cap compliant with enough salary room for their last RFA signing.
PIT
    F. Considerations
    2.
    ANA
    1. Järnkrok, Calle
    Additional Details:
    Gets the leafs cap compliant
    TOR
      F. Considerations
      Buyouts
      DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
      2024
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the BOS
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the SJS
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the ANA
      2025
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the MIN
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the ANA
      2026
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the ANA
      ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
      23$83,500,000$71,382,917$0$3,425,000$12,117,083
      Left WingCentreRight Wing
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $1,295,000$1,295,000
      LW, RW
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
      C, LW
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $7,000,000$7,000,000
      RW
      UFA - 7
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $8,000,000$8,000,000
      C, LW
      RFA - 3
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $5,000,000$5,000,000
      RW, C
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $6,250,000$6,250,000
      RW, LW
      NTC
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $3,650,000$3,650,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $1,456,250$1,456,250
      LW, C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
      $2,100,000$2,100,000
      RW, C, LW
      M-NTC
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $2,750,000$2,750,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $775,000$775,000
      C
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $5,250,000$5,250,000
      RW, LW
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $762,500$762,500
      C, RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $425,000$425,000
      C, RW
      UFA - 1
      Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $6,500,000$6,500,000
      LD/RD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $2,000,000$2,000,000
      RD
      RFA - 3
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $6,400,000$6,400,000
      G
      M-NTC
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$925,000$925K)
      LD/RD
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $4,000,000$4,000,000
      RD
      NTC
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $812,500$812,500
      G
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $775,000$775,000
      LD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $2,750,000$2,750,000
      LD/RD
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $762,500$762,500
      LD
      UFA - 1
      ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $850,000$850,000
      LD/RD
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $1,800,000$1,800,000
      C, LW
      RFA - 1

      Embed Code

      • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
      • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

      Text-Embed

      Click to Highlight
      Aug. 2, 2023 at 5:41 p.m.
      #26
      Sadness
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Mar. 2022
      Posts: 2,425
      Likes: 987
      Jarnkrok isn’t going for free, maybe a late pick at worst but not free
      Aug. 2, 2023 at 5:41 p.m.
      #27
      Rip
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Dec. 2022
      Posts: 11,902
      Likes: 3,158
      Quoting: GiggywithGibby
      2.086 over the cap, Jarnkrok is 2.1. everyone else in the neighborhood was a signing Treeiving just made, and Treeliving has traded Jarnkrok before.

      So who are you loosing to get cap compliant?


      They have many options to get there, you clowns just don't want to accept anything other than screwing over the Leafs. They could easily just send down Knies and be cap compliant with a 20 man roster. No matter how many times this is explained you guys just don't care to listen because it ruins your fun eh?
      Aug. 2, 2023 at 5:42 p.m.
      #28
      Rip
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Dec. 2022
      Posts: 11,902
      Likes: 3,158
      Quoting: pens1991
      Probably going to pretend someone else has an injury so they can go on LTIR


      You think Matt Murray would agree to this if he was healthy?
      Aug. 2, 2023 at 5:46 p.m.
      #29
      Rip
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Dec. 2022
      Posts: 11,902
      Likes: 3,158
      Quoting: GiggywithGibby
      Would have to waive Laff and Timmins to be compliant


      Or Robertson or Knies who are waiver exempt and a 20 man roster. You just don't want to accept that you are going to have to pay something to get the good players TO has. May as well just accept it and come to grips with reality.
      Aug. 2, 2023 at 5:49 p.m.
      #30
      Thread Starter
      Future Ducks legend
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2022
      Posts: 10,142
      Likes: 6,918
      Quoting: MitchMafia
      No one bud, they run 7 D (incl Timmins) and 11F (all waiver exempt players except Knies on marlies to start). Do the math or let cap friendly do it for you…not that complicated.


      The only player not named Knies who is waiver exempt on the roster is Holmberg. If you were referring to Robertson, he's on IR, not on your current crop of roster forwards.

      Forwards 13, $58,505,616
      Defense 7, $21,950,000
      Goalies 2, $4,316,667
      Non knies waivers exempt player sum salary, $800,000

      So you're either not using Knies, or you're exposing someone to waivers.
      Aug. 2, 2023 at 5:50 p.m.
      #31
      Hakuna Matata
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Feb. 2020
      Posts: 34,529
      Likes: 21,121
      All the Leafs really have to do is waive Timmins and are cap compliant. No need to move Jarnkrok unless they get value.
      Aug. 2, 2023 at 6:16 p.m.
      #32
      Thread Starter
      Future Ducks legend
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2022
      Posts: 10,142
      Likes: 6,918
      Quoting: aadoyle
      All the Leafs really have to do is waive Timmins and are cap compliant. No need to move Jarnkrok unless they get value.


      Timmins and Holmbrrg are only 1.9, still short unless you send Knies down and run 11/6 at that point.
      Aug. 2, 2023 at 6:22 p.m.
      #33
      MisstheWhalers
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2019
      Posts: 23,754
      Likes: 12,423
      Quoting: aadoyle
      All the Leafs really have to do is waive Timmins and are cap compliant. No need to move Jarnkrok unless they get value.


      I think thats what they'll do, take a chance with sending Timmins to the Marlies, if he's claimed on waivers so be it.
      Treliving didn't bring Timmins in so he'll feel no obligation to him, cant see him trading Brodie or demoting Gio which I see some posts on here doing.

      Could also see the Leafs signing a cheap veteran dmen or two to one-way league minimum contracts to play with the Marlies and be a veteran call up option should injuries happen, a guy like Jordie Benn for example.

      Just an outsiders perspective, maybe I'll be completely wrong though.. lol 😆
      Aug. 2, 2023 at 6:25 p.m.
      #34
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2023
      Posts: 2,046
      Likes: 810
      Quoting: pens1991
      I mean the Leafs didn't comment on the situation currently as to why he's on LTIR for the season and yet the player was available and deemed healthy in the playoffs and now all of a sudden hurt again? Yeah pretty suspicious, specially when the entire industry is saying the same thing lol. It's pretty easy to come out and explain the situation as to why he's on LTIR either from the Leafs or Murray himself. Everything pointed in paying to move the contract and then no one was willing and he all of a sudden is placed on LTIR???

      Yeah I'm gonna sling that all day lol, and don't for one second as a leafs fan act like it isn't suspicious at all.


      Healthy enough to sit on the bench to be a back up and healthy enough to play are 2 completely different things. If he was actually healthy Toronto woulda played him over a rookie goalie.

      Hes dealing with post concussion issues and ankle issues. They’re legit injuries.
      Aug. 2, 2023 at 6:29 p.m.
      #35
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2023
      Posts: 2,046
      Likes: 810
      Quoting: MisstheWhalers
      I think thats what they'll do, take a chance with sending Timmins to the Marlies, if he's claimed on waivers so be it.
      Treliving didn't bring Timmins in so he'll feel no obligation to him, cant see him trading Brodie or demoting Gio which I see some posts on here doing.

      Could also see the Leafs signing a cheap veteran dmen or two to one-way league minimum contracts to play with the Marlies and be a veteran call up option should injuries happen, a guy like Jordie Benn for example.

      Just an outsiders perspective, maybe I'll be completely wrong though.. lol 😆


      They’ll likely try to keep Timmins off waivers. He’d likely be claimed and they can’t afford that cause the depth on defence is thin, particularly right handed ones. & they’ve already signed those veteran, cheap defenceman in Lajoie and Lagesson. But again, both don’t shoot right so they’re trying to keep Timmins for now
      MisstheWhalers liked this.
      Aug. 2, 2023 at 6:47 p.m.
      #36
      Hakuna Matata
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Feb. 2020
      Posts: 34,529
      Likes: 21,121
      Quoting: MisstheWhalers
      I think thats what they'll do, take a chance with sending Timmins to the Marlies, if he's claimed on waivers so be it.
      Treliving didn't bring Timmins in so he'll feel no obligation to him, cant see him trading Brodie or demoting Gio which I see some posts on here doing.

      Could also see the Leafs signing a cheap veteran dmen or two to one-way league minimum contracts to play with the Marlies and be a veteran call up option should injuries happen, a guy like Jordie Benn for example.

      Just an outsiders perspective, maybe I'll be completely wrong though.. lol 😆


      I think they might just trade Timmins for some AHL player to help the Marlies as to who its gonna be 0 idea rn
      MisstheWhalers liked this.
      Aug. 2, 2023 at 8:28 p.m.
      #37
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2019
      Posts: 845
      Likes: 345
      Quoting: RipNasty
      You think Matt Murray would agree to this if he was healthy?


      Although I do think Murray is banged up enough that he deserves to be on LTIR, he absolutely benefits from agreeing to go on LTIR when he did. Now Toronto cannot buy him out and he will get his full salary, which was not going to happen if he was deemed healthy enough to be considered an active player. Now Murray will get his full salary, all paid to him this year, and will also get the benefit of working on getting back on his game while utilizing Toronto's facilities, at Toronto's expense. If Murray argued he was healthy, he would have been bought out, made less money, and spread over 2 years, and would have had to foot the fill for any training expenses in order get his game back in order.
      Aug. 2, 2023 at 9:56 p.m.
      #38
      Rip
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Dec. 2022
      Posts: 11,902
      Likes: 3,158
      Quoting: gmurrayt
      Although I do think Murray is banged up enough that he deserves to be on LTIR, he absolutely benefits from agreeing to go on LTIR when he did. Now Toronto cannot buy him out and he will get his full salary, which was not going to happen if he was deemed healthy enough to be considered an active player. Now Murray will get his full salary, all paid to him this year, and will also get the benefit of working on getting back on his game while utilizing Toronto's facilities, at Toronto's expense. If Murray argued he was healthy, he would have been bought out, made less money, and spread over 2 years, and would have had to foot the fill for any training expenses in order get his game back in order.


      That's just disrespectful to Murray. He's a pro athlete who absolutely wants to play this game if he can. This isn't about money or cap circumvention. It's a person's health, and anyone saying otherwise should be ashamed of themselves.
      Aug. 2, 2023 at 10:56 p.m.
      #39
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2023
      Posts: 522
      Likes: 244
      Quoting: GiggywithGibby
      The only player not named Knies who is waiver exempt on the roster is Holmberg. If you were referring to Robertson, he's on IR, not on your current crop of roster forwards.

      Forwards 13, $58,505,616
      Defense 7, $21,950,000
      Goalies 2, $4,316,667
      Non knies waivers exempt player sum salary, $800,000

      So you're either not using Knies, or you're exposing someone to waivers.


      Oh my - I’ll walk you through it:
      Forwards : Knies, Matthews, Nylander
      Bert, JT, Marner
      Domi, Jampf, Jarny
      Laff, Reaves
      Defense:
      Reilly, Brodie
      McCabe, klinberg
      Gio, Lili
      Timmins
      Goalie :
      Sammy
      Woll

      Everyone else in the Marlies. I guess that means moving Gambrell through waivers; I assumed you’d get that but…

      EZ PZ
      Aug. 3, 2023 at 12:13 a.m.
      #40
      Thread Starter
      Future Ducks legend
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2022
      Posts: 10,142
      Likes: 6,918
      Quoting: MitchMafia
      Oh my - I’ll walk you through it:
      Forwards : Knies, Matthews, Nylander
      Bert, JT, Marner
      Domi, Jampf, Jarny
      Laff, Reaves
      Defense:
      Reilly, Brodie
      McCabe, klinberg
      Gio, Lili
      Timmins
      Goalie :
      Sammy
      Woll

      Everyone else in the Marlies. I guess that means moving Gambrell through waivers; I assumed you’d get that but…

      EZ PZ


      Oh yeah, try to casually slip in "I was wrong" while attempting to gaslight me in the same sentence, smooth move bro.
      Aug. 3, 2023 at 10:01 a.m.
      #41
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2023
      Posts: 522
      Likes: 244
      Quoting: GiggywithGibby
      Oh yeah, try to casually slip in "I was wrong" while attempting to gaslight me in the same sentence, smooth move bro.


      You were 100% right. Leafs are over the cap; I’m sure Treliving is staying up at night trying to figure out how to send Gambrell through waivers 😂.
      Get over yourself pal; your entire premise was wrong - ‘Leafs have to panic sell to get under the cap’ was absolutely, certifiably incorrect. But you be you 👏
       
      Reply
      To create a post please Login or Register
      Question:
      Options:
      Add Option
      Submit Poll