Edited Sep. 10, 2023 at 11:43 p.m.
Quoting: penguinswin
I would take Pinto in a heartbeat over Laughton, and roll the dice on his shoulder holding up...Briere should have have some serious remorse if he TRUTHFULLY (not this "rumored" crap) turned down even one 1st round pick for Laughton
That much I agree with but I wouldn't take on Joseph or Brannstrom as part of the deal.
And then there's the usual wall of text from budgetteam.
Quoting: budgeteam
Pinto is worth more than two late 1st round picks.
No he's not.
Quoting: budgeteam
He does not have an extensive injury history. He missed one season with a shoulder injury. I don't recall him having any major injuries or red flags during college. He bounced back fine from the shoulder injury and was healthy last season.
In 3 years he's only played 99 games 82 of them last year. A shoulder injury that causes a young player to miss an entire year is a big problem. Claiming he bounced back fine is disingenuous. 35 points would be pretty decent if he was a 3rd line player for the entire year but considering how much time he spent in the top 6 due to the even more injury prone Josh Norris missing all but 8 games 35 points isn't very good at all.
Quoting: budgeteam
He is an exceptional two-way center who is great on faceoffs and scored 20 goals as a rookie. Laughton is the better player right now, but Pinto is only scratching the surface. Laughton is underpaid for the next 3 seasons, but Pinto has more team control at 5 more years as an RFA and could likely be signed to a deal that in a year or two will look better than the Laughton one.
Again no. Pinto is not an exceptional two way center etc... 20 goals and 35 points would be fine for a bottom 6 player but Pinto spent a lot of time in the top 6 last year with Norris out. He was -21 last year 3rd worst on the team very far from an "exceptional two-way center". He hasn't been great on faceoffs in the NHL either. Last year was his best year in the NHL at 52.1% that's decent but you didn't say he was decent on faceoffs you said he was great.
Quoting: budgeteam
This would not be a deal I would want to see the Senators make, it's the type of deal I could see them looking for if they feel that the salary cap will make it difficult to keep Pinto on anything other than a 1 year deal. The problem with a 1 year deal this season is that it sets them up to lose Pinto anyways next season if they want to prioritize keeping Tarasenko (which Dorion likely does since he originally offered him a long term deal). I think Dorion's ideal move is to dump Joseph and sign Pinto to a 2-3 year bridge deal that will cost control him until the cap rises. If that isn't possible because the cost to move Joseph independent of including him in a Pinto deal is too high, then maybe they will bundle both of them and trade for a cost controlled replacement for Pinto. That is what this proposal is.
Philly is not going to give up a cost controlled gritty forward for a questionable pending RFA if it means losing ~2mil in cap space by taking on 2 cap dumps and having to resign Pinto too. Joseph is a severely overpaid fringe player who wouldn't even be the 13th forward on most teams. Brannstrom is a bust and an arbitration eligible pending RFA (iow another contract headache) who's going to want a raise he doesn't deserve next year.
There's always a catch or three with your walls of text. It's never what you make it out to be.