Again this makes no sense from a blues perspective. This makes the blues far worse right now and in the future

Weird that a team that finished 17th in goals and 22nd in PPG thinks that Nylander would make their team worse? Neighbours and Parayko must be better than I thought.

Our team defense sucks so trading our best defender for another winger makes little sense for us. Plus Nylander is going to want a 9 mil plus extension which we can't afford and don't really need more wingers. Our best prospects are wingers so we need to focus on adding defensive prospects/young defenders. Now without Parayko we need to find a replacement for him while also adding another top 4 defensemen. Again it doesn't make sense from a roster wise sense or a cap wise. The blues would be better served trading Neighbors and a 1st for a defensemen rather than Nylander or just continuing the rebuild/retool by getting high picks and trading our vets for more picks

I get it but a lot of rumours going around about Parayko/Nylander trade

Would have to find a way of doing it without salary retention as Hawks ain't retaining 25% on Parayko for SEVEN YEARS.

Great for the Leafs but Chicago and St. Louis both say no way.

That should be enough to get Noah Hanifin from Calgary. Of course St. Louis would want him coming with an extension.

The blues athletic writers said that the rumors are from years ago and they won't die even though neither team has discussed anything about those players in a while

So what??? They've been going around for years, and they've always been total BS. The Blues are not doing this. Period. People need to let it go.

Also, the Blues and Hawks do not trade. Ever.

Are you surprised when it’s Toronto?

Rumors are fine. But trading Parayko and/or our 24 1st makes absolutely 0 sense for the Blues. We trade Parayko and we have the Ducks defense from last year. We extend Nylander and we can’t upgrade our defense in the off-season. We trade our 1st without fixing our entire defense rebounding and our young forwards taking another step in our own zone and limiting turnovers and we are trading a lotto pick for a rental we can’t afford to re-sign.

There’s just no plausible situation in which Parayko and our 1st is traded unless we for some reason are getting Chris Pronger and Al Macinnis at 24 years old.

Dawg just type under the quotes. If you read that I think you can see I wasn’t harping on you. Was outlining reasons why it can’t work for the Blues. The reason for hitting submit to post your ACGM is for feedback.

I accidentally included your quote, I tried to erase it but missed some. You had quality points. I prefer quality D over a good offence as well! 👍

You can save the fake victimhood act. Crazy how people get so protective over their non-stop delusions about their make believe trades we've all seen hundreds of times over years now. And about what constitutes a report, for that matter.

There are exactly zero reports going around about this nonsense.

Haha. I guess I’d be this sensitive too if I was a Blues fan.

Says the guy whose team has won exactly one round in 20 years and whose fans are notorious for their hilarious Oprah vision boards, as well as the sad, flailing insult attempts they instantly resort to when confronted with reality over said Oprah vision boards.

Must be really butt hurt… went looking for memes. Haha. Don’t worry you have 20th place locked up!

Awww. Shnookums doesn;t know when to stop digging. Adoooorable.