SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Deadline Implosion

Created by: A_K
Team: 2023-24 St. Louis Blues
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 26, 2023
Published: Sep. 26, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
STL
  1. 2024 3rd round pick (NYI)
  2. 2026 6th round pick (TOR)
2.
STL
  1. 2025 3rd round pick (NYI)
NYI
  1. Kapanen, Kasperi ($1,600,000 retained)
3.
STL
  1. Boeser, Brock
  2. Willander, Tom [Reserve List]
  3. 2025 2nd round pick (VAN)
Additional Details:
pick becomes 2025 1st if Vancouver wins 1+ round in 2024 or 2025 playoffs
VAN
  1. Buchnevich, Pavel ($1,800,000 retained)
4.
STL
  1. 2024 4th round pick (BOS)
5.
STL
  1. 2024 2nd round pick (VGK)
VGK
  1. Vrána, Jakub ($1,312,500 retained)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the STL
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the STL
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
2025
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the STL
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
2026
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the STL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,500,000$83,497,262$20,000$432,500$2,738
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$8,125,000$8,125,000
C, RW
UFA - 8
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,650,000$6,650,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
C, LW
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$8,125,000$8,125,000
RW
UFA - 8
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$852,500$852,500 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$3,571,429$3,571,429
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$835,833$835,833
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$816,667$816,667
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$775,000$775,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$775,000$775,000
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$775,000$775,000
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$800,000$800,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$3,275,000$3,275,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 26, 2023 at 1:30 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 1,061
Canucks decline. The last thing they need is more wingers, especially if it costs multiple 1sts to add said winger. Buchnevich simply doesn’t make any sense for them. Management was also clear that they drafted Willander because they view him as a partner for Hughes for 5+ years, he’s completely off limits in any trade talks.
mv21227 liked this.
Sep. 26, 2023 at 1:56 p.m.
#2
Best armchair GM yet
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 592
Likes: 139
Bortuzzo/Bertuzzi close enough. As a B's fans, we'll take it.
mokumboi liked this.
Sep. 26, 2023 at 2:12 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 10,188
Likes: 9,411
Buch is great, but the Canucks aren’t trading Willander
Sep. 26, 2023 at 2:22 p.m.
#4
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,348
Likes: 11,375
Definitely not a fan of that Buch trade. Just all wrong pieces coming back.
Sep. 26, 2023 at 2:35 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 133
Likes: 85
The Canucks trade is atrocious from a Vancouver perspective. A blue-chip right-handed defence prospect, a potential first-round pick, and a top-six winger for a slightly older, better (by not significant enough) winger?

I may be bias, but based on team need, and positional value, I wouldn't even trade Willander for Buch at this point if I'm Vancouver. They need young cheap defensemen, particularly righties.
Sep. 26, 2023 at 2:37 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 188
Likes: 121
Quoting: mokumboi
Definitely not a fan of that Buch trade. Just all wrong pieces coming back.


What would you like to see in a Buch trade? Vrana for a pick is fine and all but the thought of Buch with retention from looking at this agm is awfully tasty
Sep. 26, 2023 at 2:45 p.m.
#7
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,348
Likes: 11,375
Quoting: SmoothMcCrimmonal
What would you like to see in a Buch trade? Vrana for a pick is fine and all but the thought of Buch with retention from looking at this agm is awfully tasty


Well, I'm not interested in trading Buch. But going by his hypothetical scenario, what I would not want is an overpaid essentially UFA Boeser, a deferred 2nd with tenuous conditions and a top 4 RD type. If I want a blue chip prospect, I want someone like Coronato or Mukhmadullin . If I want a roster player, I want a partner for Parayko like Lindgren. It's just the wrong pieces for my taste.
Sep. 26, 2023 at 3:20 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 2,783
Likes: 1,421
Quoting: dfawcett
The Canucks trade is atrocious from a Vancouver perspective. A blue-chip right-handed defence prospect, a potential first-round pick, and a top-six winger for a slightly older, better (by not significant enough) winger?

I may be bias, but based on team need, and positional value, I wouldn't even trade Willander for Buch at this point if I'm Vancouver. They need young cheap defensemen, particularly righties.


I’m not trying to advocate Vancouver should do this. But I think you vastly underrate what Buchnevich provides versus Boeser. Personally I think it’s pretty fair value for Buch and I say that while being very high on Willander.
Sep. 26, 2023 at 3:23 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 2,783
Likes: 1,421
I think all of these trades are prettty reasonable. I don’t love the idea of moving Buch. Also, very nitpicky, but I could see Kapanen and or vrana being worth a lot more or a lot less dependent on this season. High talent guys with legit questions at very affordable contracts with no long term commitment. Very hard to gauge up until the point of a deal.
A_K liked this.
Sep. 26, 2023 at 3:50 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 188
Likes: 121
Quoting: mokumboi
Well, I'm not interested in trading Buch. But going by his hypothetical scenario, what I would not want is an overpaid essentially UFA Boeser, a deferred 2nd with tenuous conditions and a top 4 RD type. If I want a blue chip prospect, I want someone like Coronato or Mukhmadullin . If I want a roster player, I want a partner for Parayko like Lindgren. It's just the wrong pieces for my taste.


Would this years first from the knights + one of Cormier/Chayka and maybe something else do anything for you guys? A Hague package? Hypothetical fun of course, I'd agree with your sentiment of being better off keeping Buch
mokumboi liked this.
Sep. 26, 2023 at 4:39 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 3,789
Likes: 1,208
Quoting: dfawcett
The Canucks trade is atrocious from a Vancouver perspective. A blue-chip right-handed defence prospect, a potential first-round pick, and a top-six winger for a slightly older, better (by not significant enough) winger?

I may be bias, but based on team need, and positional value, I wouldn't even trade Willander for Buch at this point if I'm Vancouver. They need young cheap defensemen, particularly righties.


I don't see this trade happening.
It looks bizarre.
Sep. 26, 2023 at 4:50 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Lets Go Blues
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 6,777
Likes: 4,333
Quoting: Vancity2196
I don't see this trade happening.
It looks bizarre.


If you really wanna know, I tried to make every concession to see if any Canucks fans would consider trading Willander and apparently no one would do it. There's retained money, Blues take back unwanted cap to make it fit, there is a condition on the pick. Is the bizarre part the idea that Buch is worth that much more than Boeser? Because I would consider Buch among the top 25 wingers in the NHL. Obviously no one wants to part with Willander and I can see his upside, but he's a prospect with a good amount of development/risk in his future.
Sep. 26, 2023 at 4:51 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 133
Likes: 85
Quoting: AC14
I’m not trying to advocate Vancouver should do this. But I think you vastly underrate what Buchnevich provides versus Boeser. Personally I think it’s pretty fair value for Buch and I say that while being very high on Willander.


That's fair re: my evaluation of Buch. But in a trade proposal, context does matter and the Canucks issue isn't a wing issue. Their biggest issue is a defence issue. So even if the straight value is accurate (which I disagree with based on the value of puck-moving RHD), based on organizational holes and needs in Van (e.g. defence, cheap/efficient talent, young players making a difference), I think the value Willander holds to the Canucks is greater than the value they would get back in Buchnevich. Value is a relative thing. Buch just doesn't really represent significant value to the Canucks given their context, and I think for most teams the only way they move a young puck-moving RHD for a player like Buch is if they are looking for that last piece to push them over the top.
AC14 liked this.
Sep. 26, 2023 at 5:01 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Lets Go Blues
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 6,777
Likes: 4,333
Quoting: dfawcett
That's fair re: my evaluation of Buch. But in a trade proposal, context does matter and the Canucks issue isn't a wing issue. Their biggest issue is a defence issue. So even if the straight value is accurate (which I disagree with based on the value of puck-moving RHD), based on organizational holes and needs in Van (e.g. defence, cheap/efficient talent, young players making a difference), I think the value Willander holds to the Canucks is greater than the value they would get back in Buchnevich. Value is a relative thing. Buch just doesn't really represent significant value to the Canucks given their context, and I think for most teams the only way they move a young puck-moving RHD for a player like Buch is if they are looking for that last piece to push them over the top.


It's a fair point. Hard to justify the move if you think the Canucks still need a few more pieces to build around. But from the Blues perspective this is moving their best trade piece, they better make sure they get something back that can make an impact down the road. If it isn't from VAN, I think the general value is reasonable enough.
Sep. 26, 2023 at 5:08 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 133
Likes: 85
Quoting: A_K
It's a fair point. Hard to justify the move if you think the Canucks still need a few more pieces to build around. But from the Blues perspective this is moving their best trade piece, they better make sure they get something back that can make an impact down the road. If it isn't from VAN, I think the general value is reasonable enough.


I think you just chose the wrong team haha - I agree 100% with the concept though smile

It's something I wish Vancouver could have figured out many times over the past decade...
A_K liked this.
Sep. 26, 2023 at 5:46 p.m.
#16
Ktownchef
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 415
Likes: 172
No chance Canucks are trading their newest top 10 pick along with the rest for an upgrade on the wing.

Borderline ridiculous ask to be honest.
Sep. 26, 2023 at 8:31 p.m.
#17
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,348
Likes: 11,375
Quoting: SmoothMcCrimmonal
Would this years first from the knights + one of Cormier/Chayka and maybe something else do anything for you guys? A Hague package? Hypothetical fun of course, I'd agree with your sentiment of being better off keeping Buch


Nah, not even remotely.
Sep. 26, 2023 at 11:22 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 2,783
Likes: 1,421
Quoting: dfawcett
That's fair re: my evaluation of Buch. But in a trade proposal, context does matter and the Canucks issue isn't a wing issue. Their biggest issue is a defence issue. So even if the straight value is accurate (which I disagree with based on the value of puck-moving RHD), based on organizational holes and needs in Van (e.g. defence, cheap/efficient talent, young players making a difference), I think the value Willander holds to the Canucks is greater than the value they would get back in Buchnevich. Value is a relative thing. Buch just doesn't really represent significant value to the Canucks given their context, and I think for most teams the only way they move a young puck-moving RHD for a player like Buch is if they are looking for that last piece to push them over the top.


Would definitely agree with that. That being said, as our own issue was pushed towards the backend. Some of the responsibility also lies on the forwards. It’s why it’s hard for us as fans who watch consistently to entertain the idea of moving buch. He’s an elite two-way player on a very good contract and in an age range the front office desires to have this thing turned around. The benefits of adding a guy like that are large in both ends of the ice and pp/es/pk.

I don’t however think the Canucks are a Buch away from being a contender and thus your rational is why I wouldn’t advocate the Canucks to do something like this. I really like Willanders game and was hoping the Blues would take him in the draft. However, as things shook out I’m very happy with the alternative we got.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll