SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Calgary Retool 2024 Season

Created by: Lancebmx
Team: 2024-25 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 27, 2023
Published: Oct. 27, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Next year's team after my 2024 deadline.

Scratches are all players I expect to be battling for a roster spot.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,200,000
3$1,500,000
1$975,000
2$850,000
2$850,000
2$2,500,000
2$875,000
2$925,000
3$4,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$850,000
1$775,000
1$925,000
3$3,600,000
Trades
1.
CGY
  1. Brunet, Frédéric
  2. 2025 1st round pick (BOS)
  3. 2026 2nd round pick (BOS)
Additional Details:
Matt Grzelcyk
BOS
    Noah Hanifin

    2024 Trade Deadline
    2.
    CGY
    1. Liljegren, Timothy [RFA Rights]
    2. Robertson, Nicholas [RFA Rights]
    3. 2024 1st round pick (TOR)
    Additional Details:
    2024 5th Round Pick - CHI for third team to retain extra on Tanev.
    TOR
      Chris Tanev 2.25M Retained
      Nikita Zadorov 1.875M Retained

      2024 Trade Deadline
      3.
      CGY
      1. Krebs, Peyton [RFA Rights]
      2. Mittelstadt, Casey [RFA Rights]
      3. Östlund, Noah
      4. 2024 1st round pick (BUF)
      BUF
        Elias Lindholm

        2024 Trade Deadline
        4.
        CGY
        1. 2024 2nd round pick (NYR)
        NYR
          Matt Grzelcyk

          2024 Trade Deadline
          5.
          CBJ
          1. 2024 3rd round pick (CGY)
          Additional Details:
          2024 Trade Deadline
          6.
          CGY
            Detroit will need a backup and Vladar's play I don't feel is worth his cap hit considering how many cheap backups will be available.
            DET
            1. Vladar, Daniel
            2. 2026 6th round pick (CGY)
            Additional Details:
            2024 Draft
            DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
            2024
            Logo of the CGY
            Logo of the TOR
            Logo of the BUF
            Logo of the CGY
            Logo of the NYR
            Logo of the CGY
            Logo of the CGY
            2025
            Logo of the FLA
            Logo of the BOS
            Logo of the CGY
            Logo of the CGY
            Logo of the CGY
            Logo of the CGY
            Logo of the CGY
            2026
            Logo of the CGY
            Logo of the CGY
            Logo of the BOS
            Logo of the CGY
            Logo of the CGY
            Logo of the CGY
            Logo of the CGY
            ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
            29$87,500,000$82,836,666$0$1,562,500$4,663,334
            Left WingCentreRight Wing
            Logo of the Calgary Flames
            $10,500,000$10,500,000
            LW, RW
            NMC
            UFA - 7
            Logo of the Calgary Flames
            $7,000,000$7,000,000
            C
            NMC
            UFA - 5
            Logo of the Calgary Flames
            $5,800,000$5,800,000
            RW, LW
            M-NTC
            UFA - 1
            $4,500,000$4,500,000
            LW, C
            RFA
            Logo of the Calgary Flames
            $3,200,000$3,200,000
            LW, RW, C
            RFA
            Logo of the Calgary Flames
            $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
            RW
            RFA - 1
            $925,000$925,000
            C, LW
            RFA
            Logo of the Calgary Flames
            $4,500,000$4,500,000
            C
            NMC
            UFA - 2
            Logo of the Calgary Flames
            $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
            LW, C
            RFA - 1
            Logo of the Calgary Flames
            $1,500,000$1,500,000
            LW, C
            UFA
            Logo of the Calgary Flames
            $3,100,000$3,100,000
            C, LW, RW
            UFA - 1
            Logo of the Calgary Flames
            $4,900,000$4,900,000
            RW, LW
            M-NTC
            UFA - 3
            Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
            Logo of the Calgary Flames
            $6,250,000$6,250,000
            LD/RD
            NTC
            UFA - 7
            Logo of the Calgary Flames
            $4,550,000$4,550,000
            RD
            M-NTC
            UFA - 2
            Logo of the Calgary Flames
            $6,000,000$6,000,000
            G
            NMC
            UFA - 2
            $3,600,000$3,600,000
            LD
            UFA
            $2,500,000$2,500,000
            RD
            RFA
            Logo of the Calgary Flames
            $975,000$975,000
            G
            RFA
            Logo of the Calgary Flames
            $850,000$850,000
            LD
            UFA
            Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
            $2,750,000$2,750,000
            RD
            UFA - 2
            ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
            Logo of the Calgary Flames
            $850,000$850,000
            LD
            RFA
            $875,000$875,000
            LW, RW
            RFA
            Logo of the Calgary Flames
            $775,000$775,000
            LW, RW
            UFA - 1
            Logo of the Calgary Flames
            $775,000$775,000
            RW, LW
            UFA
            Logo of the Calgary Flames
            $825,000$825,000
            RW
            UFA - 1
            Logo of the Calgary Flames
            $925,000$925,000
            LD/RD
            UFA
            Logo of the Calgary Flames
            $823,333$823,333
            LD
            RFA - 1
            Logo of the Calgary Flames
            $850,000$850,000
            LW
            RFA
            Logo of the Calgary Flames
            $950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
            LW
            RFA - 2
            Taxi Squad
            Logo of the Boston Bruins
            $860,000$860,000 ($0$0$0$0)
            LD
            RFA - 2
            Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
            $918,333$918,333 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$475,000$475K)
            C
            RFA - 2

            Embed Code

            • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
            • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

            Text-Embed

            Click to Highlight
            Oct. 27, 2023 at 6:35 a.m.
            #1
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jun. 2017
            Posts: 7,728
            Likes: 5,928
            Sabres easily decline. That is way too much for a rental. Mitts isn't going anywhere and I don't think krebs is either. Makes no sense to trade those two for a rental. Take those two out and it's more realistic.
            Oct. 27, 2023 at 6:39 a.m.
            #2
            GM
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jul. 2022
            Posts: 3,903
            Likes: 1,737
            Not interested in Grzelcyk if I'm Drury. Top 9 alt bott 6 Fw would be more interesting if I was him.
            Oct. 27, 2023 at 6:41 a.m.
            #3
            Thread Starter
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Oct. 2020
            Posts: 10,667
            Likes: 8,265
            Quoting: wojme
            Sabres easily decline. That is way too much for a rental. Mitts isn't going anywhere and I don't think krebs is either. Makes no sense to trade those two for a rental. Take those two out and it's more realistic.


            Lindholm is not a rental in this scenario, he signs an extension. Also, with the players they have coming up Mitts and Krebs could be expendable. By adding Lindholm that likely bumps Cozens to the wing, maybe Thompson but he didn't start playing like he did until he was playing centre.
            Oct. 27, 2023 at 6:42 a.m.
            #4
            Thread Starter
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Oct. 2020
            Posts: 10,667
            Likes: 8,265
            Quoting: AG_sweden
            Not interested in Grzelcyk if I'm Drury. Top 9 alt bott 6 Fw would be more interesting if I was him.


            That's fair, just not a big fan of Gustafsson, could easily be any team though.
            AG_sweden liked this.
            Oct. 27, 2023 at 6:51 a.m.
            #5
            Shanny
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jun. 2020
            Posts: 64
            Likes: 7
            Leafs decline.
            JesikaMorris liked this.
            Oct. 27, 2023 at 7:12 a.m.
            #6
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jun. 2017
            Posts: 7,728
            Likes: 5,928
            Quoting: Lancebmx
            Lindholm is not a rental in this scenario, he signs an extension. Also, with the players they have coming up Mitts and Krebs could be expendable. By adding Lindholm that likely bumps Cozens to the wing, maybe Thompson but he didn't start playing like he did until he was playing centre.


            Lindholm isn't needed and why would they give him a max extension at 29? Would much rather give Casey a big contract since he seems to just keep getting better. Sabres already have 3 top 6 centers, they don't need to add another, especially if they are paying this big of a price tag.
            Oct. 27, 2023 at 7:40 a.m.
            #7
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Apr. 2020
            Posts: 5,715
            Likes: 4,783
            Drop Krebs and I would do that trade for Andersson.
            gretzkyghosts liked this.
            Oct. 27, 2023 at 7:49 a.m.
            #8
            Banned
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Oct. 2023
            Posts: 603
            Likes: 155
            Quoting: Shannyplan
            Leafs decline.


            Yeah lol lily cannot be obtained by a normal offer and this is an overpayment if anything lily pays for tanev at worst and a second pays for zadorov
            gretzkyghosts liked this.
            Oct. 27, 2023 at 7:54 a.m.
            #9
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Feb. 2020
            Posts: 2,144
            Likes: 2,027
            Quoting: Lancebmx
            Lindholm is not a rental in this scenario, he signs an extension. Also, with the players they have coming up Mitts and Krebs could be expendable. By adding Lindholm that likely bumps Cozens to the wing, maybe Thompson but he didn't start playing like he did until he was playing centre.


            The difference between mitts and Lindholm isn’t what you have proposed here. Not even close.
            AntiAnalytics liked this.
            Oct. 27, 2023 at 8:09 a.m.
            #10
            GM
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jul. 2022
            Posts: 3,903
            Likes: 1,737
            Quoting: Lancebmx
            That's fair, just not a big fan of Gustafsson, could easily be any team though.


            Me neither but he has proven me wrong so far.
            Oct. 27, 2023 at 8:28 a.m.
            #11
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Feb. 2023
            Posts: 3,478
            Likes: 1,451
            Nope from the Rangers. Gus works just fine as 3rd LD in Lavi's system.
            Oct. 27, 2023 at 8:50 a.m.
            #12
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Sep. 2018
            Posts: 2,153
            Likes: 1,842
            CBJ accept, but given the fact that we're still sitting 2 defenseman a night, a Peeke trade probably happens well before the TDL. Peeke for a 3rd is probably available right now, and I'm not sure he'll still be there at the deadline.
            Oct. 27, 2023 at 10:32 a.m.
            #13
            Leafs going to Leafs
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Dec. 2022
            Posts: 10,090
            Likes: 3,056
            Replace Lilly with a 3rd and Leafs accept
            gretzkyghosts and JesikaMorris liked this.
            Oct. 27, 2023 at 1:46 p.m.
            #14
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jul. 2023
            Posts: 5,800
            Likes: 3,802
            Quoting: Lancebmx
            Lindholm is not a rental in this scenario, he signs an extension. Also, with the players they have coming up Mitts and Krebs could be expendable. By adding Lindholm that likely bumps Cozens to the wing, maybe Thompson but he didn't start playing like he did until he was playing centre.


            I like Lindholm, BUT

            1- you’re asking too much for him

            2- the Sabres aren’t looking to bring in a $10mil + player

            3- especially not at a position where we are already loaded


            It just isn’t gonna happen
            wojme and gretzkyghosts liked this.
             
            Reply
            To create a post please Login or Register
            Question:
            Options:
            Add Option
            Submit Poll