SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Now maybe Im crazy

Created by: squashmaple
Team: 2023-24 Columbus Blue Jackets
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 8, 2023
Published: Nov. 8, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I've been reading a lot about Huberdeau today and the discussion on various message boards has brought up that he's a pure stylistic mismatch for the Calgary flames. But you know what team could very well be a good match? Columbus. The Jackets have multiple puck-moving defensemen and forwards who can gain the zone. Huberdeau's a passenger who can thrive in a system built for him, like he did in Florida. Calgary just very much is not that place.

This retention might be a bitter pill to swallow, I know. But no team is taking on his full 10.5, and this gets him off the team and off the books at 10.5 and nets you some bodies who aren't without skill. Also fully willing to edit and discuss, not that Calgary has much leverage. Four million is definitely high, but perhaps there is a number that would be palatable to get them out of the contract but is also amenable to the receiving team?

But Huberdeau at 6.5 to a team with a better system fit for the type of player he is? *That* sounds like a Jarmo move.
Trades
CBJ
  1. Huberdeau, Jonathan ($4,000,000 retained)
Additional Details:
I know that's a lot of retention. But it saves you from having 10.5 of useless money sitting on your books, and the contract as structured is essentially buy-out proof anyway
CGY
  1. Peeke, Andrew
  2. Roslovic, Jack
Additional Details:
For cap purposes, fully willing to negotiate
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
2025
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the VGK
2026
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,500,000$79,189,166$0$5,900,000$4,310,834
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$9,750,000$9,750,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$3,750,000$3,750,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$925,000$925,000
LW, C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,200,000$3M)
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,525,000$1,525,000
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$800,000$800,000
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,500,000$2,500,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$975,000$975,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,100,000$1,100,000
RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$9,583,333$9,583,333
LD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$6,250,000$6,250,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$5,400,000$5,400,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$4,725,000$4,725,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$762,500$762,500
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,333,333$2,333,333
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$8,700,000$8,700,000
C, RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,050,000$1,050,000
G
RFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 8, 2023 at 11:47 a.m.
#1
True Reverse Retro
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 4,632
Likes: 3,040
No team is going to retain $32M over the next 8 seasons. Even if the trade value were spot on, Calgary isn't retaining.
Nov. 8, 2023 at 11:48 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 694
Calgary won’t retain on 4 millions on Huberdeau for 8 years for literally nothing. Huberdeau have lost is swagger but he still is a high end talent and with a change of scenary could get back to is old self.
TheMooterus liked this.
Nov. 8, 2023 at 11:49 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
not a he )
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 3,242
Likes: 4,430
Quoting: TheMooterus
No team is going to retain $32M over the next 8 seasons. Even if the trade value were spot on, Calgary isn't retaining.


That's where I'm stuck, too. Maybe with some negotiation and other teams also retaining? Would start to get expensive for everyone, though. The best thing is probably for him and Calgary to mutually terminate since that contract is totally immovable.
Nov. 8, 2023 at 11:51 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 903
It's a weird case where Huberdeau is somehow more valuable to the Flames than he is in a trade of any sort.

Retaining $4M for 8 years on a team that has the trajectory of a rebuilder at this point doesn't make any sense, especially when they have $30M projected in cap space this off season. Hanging onto Huberdeau and insulating him with players that work with his style should be how Calgary goes about this and hopefully they can reopen a competitive window within his contract. Jacob Pelletier was a catalyst for Huberdeau last season, he's been out all year and likely comes back after the all star break, making a move for a young enough guy in Duclair or signing him in the offseason could make sense as well. Lindholm and Huberdeau clearly don't fit, the most detrimental thing Calgary could do is sign Lindholm long term, big money and continue ramming a square peg in a round hole.
Nov. 8, 2023 at 11:51 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
not a he )
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 3,242
Likes: 4,430
Quoting: Joblow
Calgary won’t retain on 4 millions on Huberdeau for 8 years for literally nothing. Huberdeau have lost is swagger but he still is a high end talent and with a change of scenary could get back to is old self.


Depends how urgent it becomes there. They're only out of the cellar of the Pacific because two teams are somehow worse. Opening up 6.5 million for eight years might be worth it. I just picked 4 randomly.
Nov. 8, 2023 at 11:55 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
not a he )
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 3,242
Likes: 4,430
Quoting: yycofred
It's a weird case where Huberdeau is somehow more valuable to the Flames than he is in a trade of any sort.

Retaining $4M for 8 years on a team that has the trajectory of a rebuilder at this point doesn't make any sense, especially when they have $30M projected in cap space this off season. Hanging onto Huberdeau and insulating him with players that work with his style should be how Calgary goes about this and hopefully they can reopen a competitive window within his contract. Jacob Pelletier was a catalyst for Huberdeau last season, he's been out all year and likely comes back after the all star break, making a move for a young enough guy in Duclair or signing him in the offseason could make sense as well. Lindholm and Huberdeau clearly don't fit, the most detrimental thing Calgary could do is sign Lindholm long term, big money and continue ramming a square peg in a round hole.


If his contract was even a million less, they'd probably have more options. I agree Calgary's best option is to hang on and try to make the best of it and try to build around him. I've seen multiple Huberdeau-for-Gaudreau and that just got me thinking. Maybe not for Johnny, who'd never approve a trade back west, but I'm not opposed at all to bringing in Huberdeau in a vacuum.

Four million in retention is definitely too much for sure. I just picked the number randomly. But you've got to think there might be a number they'd willing to retain in order to get out of the contract, especially with Kadri's equally immovable one on the books and the likelihood they retain Lindholm.
Nov. 8, 2023 at 12:06 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,578
Likes: 19,707
Quoting: squashmaple
Depends how urgent it becomes there. They're only out of the cellar of the Pacific because two teams are somehow worse. Opening up 6.5 million for eight years might be worth it. I just picked 4 randomly.


Tell that to the flames cheapskate owner
Nov. 8, 2023 at 12:08 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 903
Quoting: squashmaple
If his contract was even a million less, they'd probably have more options. I agree Calgary's best option is to hang on and try to make the best of it and try to build around him. I've seen multiple Huberdeau-for-Gaudreau and that just got me thinking. Maybe not for Johnny, who'd never approve a trade back west, but I'm not opposed at all to bringing in Huberdeau in a vacuum.

Four million in retention is definitely too much for sure. I just picked the number randomly. But you've got to think there might be a number they'd willing to retain in order to get out of the contract, especially with Kadri's equally immovable one on the books and the likelihood they retain Lindholm.


I don't think the Flames would want Gaudreau back, I personally just want his crazy uncle back in town, love that guy!

Kadri is a really simple buyout later in the deal and right now has been the best Flames in the last handful of games, even when people were down on him early this season he was still leading the team in a ton of advanced metrics and expected goals, it seems like he's found a really good connection with a rookie and they've taken off. I think there's a pretty low chance Calgary retains on Lindholm, he's not helping himself whatsoever in a contract year, if his ask is still anywhere over $8.5 Calgary should run the other way, I think that he's played himself into a spot where he's going to want more than he's worth Calgary won't offer that and he can go test the market to see of he can get that similar to what Kadri did, no one is going to get near $9 and he will settle somewhere else other than Calgary.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll