SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Tank time

Created by: xercuses
Team: 2023-24 Edmonton Oilers
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 10, 2023
Published: Nov. 10, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Obviously super unrealistic but I’m just having fun lol
Trades
1.
EDM
  1. Danielson, Nate
  2. Fabbri, Robby
  3. Kasper, Marco
  4. 2024 1st round pick (BOS)
  5. 2026 2nd round pick (DET)
2.
EDM
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. 2025 1st round pick (BOS)
  3. 2026 2nd round pick (BOS)
3.
EDM
  1. Byfield, Quinton
  2. Clarke, Brandt
  3. Dubois, Pierre-Luc
  4. 2024 1st round pick (LAK)
  5. 2025 2nd round pick (LAK)
  6. 2026 2nd round pick (LAK)
Additional Details:
I know they just trade for and signed PLD but I mean it’s McJesus
4.
EDM
  1. Leddy, Nick
  2. Robertsson, Simon [Reserve List]
  3. Rosén, Calle
  4. 2024 2nd round pick (STL)
  5. 2024 2nd round pick (TOR)
STL
  1. Ekholm, Mattias ($1,000,000 retained)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the STL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the NSH
2025
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2026
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the DET
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$73,873,292$850,000$7,375,000$9,626,708
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,125,000$5,125,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C
UFA - 8
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,650,000$3M)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$775,000$775,000 (Performance Bonus$3,225,000$3M)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$650,000$650K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$874,125$874,125
RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,100,000$2,100,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$775,000$775,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$9,250,000$9,250,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,600,000$2,600,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$762,500$762,500
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,250,000$3,250,000
RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$900,000$900,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 10, 2023 at 10:21 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 3,035
Likes: 1,457
Blues have no need for Ekholm. We are not competing so why waste assets. We are retooling/rebuilding
Nov. 10, 2023 at 10:22 a.m.
#2
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2023
Posts: 2,981
Likes: 590
Way under selling on all of them
Nov. 10, 2023 at 10:23 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Xercuses
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 13,506
Likes: 3,616
Quoting: Tennisman142
Blues have no need for Ekholm. We are not competing so why waste assets. We are retooling/rebuilding


Yes we do lol
I don’t know if I can watch another game if Leddy Scandella or Krug paired with Parayko
Nov. 10, 2023 at 10:23 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Xercuses
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 13,506
Likes: 3,616
Quoting: Kinger25
Way under selling on all of them


I agree but they have so much value it was difficult not to lol
Kinger25 liked this.
Nov. 10, 2023 at 10:29 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,799
Likes: 8,840
Take out the 1st…maybe, doubt it but maybe. RNH likely blocks though.
Nov. 10, 2023 at 10:31 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,799
Likes: 8,840
Quoting: Kinger25
Way under selling on all of them


That’s an overpayment by Boston, significantly.

The difference between Debrusk and RNH is not a 1st + 2nd.
Nov. 10, 2023 at 10:31 a.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Xercuses
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 13,506
Likes: 3,616
Quoting: Gofnut999
Take out the 1st…maybe. RNH likely blocks though.


I think you meant to say take out the 2nd but if you seriously think he’s only worth debrusk and a 2nd you gotta another thing coming lol

I mean debrusk hasn’t even really played amazing this year either
Nov. 10, 2023 at 10:32 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 1,627
No thanks. Kings have a winning lineup.

You can keep your losing lineup.

Also tanking hasn’t helped the oilers to this point. Why tank again? lol
Nov. 10, 2023 at 10:34 a.m.
#9
Joe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 7,667
Likes: 5,592
Detroit is not the team to pay for Draisatl.
Billy12Bob liked this.
Nov. 10, 2023 at 10:34 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 3,035
Likes: 1,457
Quoting: xercuses
Yes we do lol
I don’t know if I can watch another game if Leddy Scandella or Krug paired with Parayko


I mean we aren't competing. So getting Ekholm won't make a huge difference overall. Maybe we can get into the wild card and get destroyed in the 1st round with him
Nov. 10, 2023 at 10:35 a.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Xercuses
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 13,506
Likes: 3,616
Quoting: KINGS67
No thanks. Kings have a winning lineup.

You can keep your losing lineup.

Also tanking hasn’t helped the oilers to this point. Why tank again? lol


Cause going for certainly hasn’t help them
At least when they tank they win albeit they win the lottery but still

Also I chose the kings to reanact the Gretzky trade
Nov. 10, 2023 at 10:35 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,799
Likes: 8,840
Quoting: xercuses
I think you meant to say take out the 2nd but if you seriously think he’s only worth debrusk and a 2nd you gotta another thing coming lol

I mean debrusk hasn’t even really played amazing this year either


Well you’d be wrong. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Swap Debrusk/2nd for Merkulov/3rd you are in the ballpark of RNH value.
Nov. 10, 2023 at 10:37 a.m.
#13
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2023
Posts: 2,981
Likes: 590
Quoting: Gofnut999
That’s an overpayment by Boston, significantly.

The difference between Debrusk and RNH is not a 1st + 2nd.


Vastly more at least 2 1sts 100 point player on a legendary contract
Nov. 10, 2023 at 10:38 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 2,755
Likes: 1,404
Quoting: Tennisman142
I mean we aren't competing. So getting Ekholm won't make a huge difference overall. Maybe we can get into the wild card and get destroyed in the 1st round with him


I tend to beleive that management would prefer that and honestly I’m not too sure which way I would tend to lean.

In all reality I wish/hope if we’re going to he bad again in the next 3 years it’s this year and we figure out a way to add another 1st. It’s supposedly a really good defense draft and adding a top end defense prospect would really set our pipeline nicely.
Nov. 10, 2023 at 10:38 a.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,799
Likes: 8,840
Quoting: Kinger25
Vastly more at least 2 1sts 100 point player on a legendary contract


He is a 65 point player with an outlier season that will never be duplicated. That’s not his value. 🤷🏻‍♂️
Nov. 10, 2023 at 10:39 a.m.
#16
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2023
Posts: 2,981
Likes: 590
Quoting: Gofnut999
He is a 65 point player with an outlier season that will never be duplicated. That’s not his value. 🤷🏻‍♂️


It is now
Nov. 10, 2023 at 10:40 a.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 2,755
Likes: 1,404
Quoting: Kinger25
Vastly more at least 2 1sts 100 point player on a legendary contract


He scored like 60 powerplay points last season. Very hard to judge that as so. Factually correct. But there’s an asterisk there
Kinger25 liked this.
Nov. 10, 2023 at 10:40 a.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,799
Likes: 8,840
Quoting: Kinger25
It is now


Nope.
Nov. 10, 2023 at 10:48 a.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 3,035
Likes: 1,457
Quoting: AC14
I tend to beleive that management would prefer that and honestly I’m not too sure which way I would tend to lean.

In all reality I wish/hope if we’re going to he bad again in the next 3 years it’s this year and we figure out a way to add another 1st. It’s supposedly a really good defense draft and adding a top end defense prospect would really set our pipeline nicely.


I don't think the blues will be adding at the expense of futures. Also Ekholm is playing hurt and has not looked good this year. I think that keep the same team, sell at the deadline if you can. Use your second round picks to either draft, trade up, or target some younger players.
Nov. 10, 2023 at 10:48 a.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Xercuses
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 13,506
Likes: 3,616
Quoting: Gofnut999
Well you’d be wrong. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Swap Debrusk/2nd for Merkulov/3rd you are in the ballpark of RNH value.


Lol pass the weed bro
Dude a consistent 65 point player that nets you at least a first
Nov. 10, 2023 at 10:52 a.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,799
Likes: 8,840
Edited Nov. 10, 2023 at 10:58 a.m.
Quoting: xercuses
Lol pass the weed bro
Dude a consistent 65 point player that nets you at least a first


Lay off the weed and focus. 1st/Merk/3rd was my valuation. 🙄🤣

Boston would take nothing less than 2nd/B+ prospect for Debrusk. The dif between him and RNH i repeat, is not 1st/2nd. 🤷🏻‍♂️
Nov. 10, 2023 at 10:57 a.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 465
Bruins decline. Too much to give up for a player the Bruins don't need.
Nov. 10, 2023 at 11:14 a.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 5,588
Likes: 3,001
Detroit is not going to trade their two best centre prospects + two good picks for a player that will become UFA after next season.
Nov. 10, 2023 at 11:28 a.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Quoting: Billy12Bob
Detroit is not going to trade their two best centre prospects + two good picks for a player that will become UFA after next season.



Uhh, yeah we would and should. The biggest piece missing from the team is a legit top 6 C. I'd prefer to keep Danielson and move Ed instead. If we traded for Draisaitl and were able to lock him up to even a 4 year extension, you have your 1/2C set for the next 5 years. 2 top prospects, 2 1sts and a roster player(Fabbri, Ras or a dman) is probably the cost and I pay that all day.
Nov. 10, 2023 at 11:51 a.m.
#25
Thread Starter
Xercuses
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 13,506
Likes: 3,616
Quoting: Gofnut999
Lay off the weed and focus. 1st/Merk/3rd was my valuation. 🙄🤣

Boston would take nothing less than 2nd/B+ prospect for Debrusk. The dif between him and RNH i repeat, is not 1st/2nd. 🤷🏻‍♂️


Lol my bad I though that was after removing the first which you said earlier lol
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll