SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Nowhere Fast

Created by: mh61
Team: 2023-24 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 12, 2023
Published: Nov. 12, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Flames are going nowhere fast so why not tear it down and go full rebuild.

First trade with leafs, they need big D-changes and Flames need talent for the future, Nylander is on an expiring contract and they are up against the cap. This deal gives them some cap relief in the future and improves their defence for the year:
Rielly-Taney
McCabe-Weager
Zadorov-Brodie
They have to give up a big piece but they get rid of a problem in Klingberg and get 3 really good defenders in return. Liljgren in to help cap work. In the end Tanev, Klingberg and Zadorov are all on on expiring contracts and with tanevs age and Zadorovs value the return for either would probably be a 2nd round pick at best so my math here is Nylander liljgren > weager and Tanev and Zadorov > Klingberg overall the deal seems pretty fair

Coleman is a guy teams could target for some secondary scoring on the 2nd/3rd line and can also contribute on the PK for a contending team. Could expect a package of picks and prospects based on his deal length (4years) . Trade could happen with any contender

No point in having Marky if we are rebuilding, Oilers need a goalie and out of the Campbell contract but we make them pay for it with a 1st, 2nd and Broberg. Wolf is likely the goalie of the future and will be cost controlled the next 2-3 years so we can afford to absorb the Campbell money

Vladar can go anywhere at the deadline to a team needing a goalie teams in on it can change as the year progresses with injuries etc. return is probably a 2-3rd round pick

In this scenario I’m hoping lindholm can see the light at the end of the tunnel with the add of nylander and the chance to play with him and Huberdeau with the addition of really good young players (Zary, Pelletier, and Coranato) and decides to reup with the flames
Trades
1.
CGY
  1. Klingberg, John
  2. Liljegren, Timothy
  3. Nylander, William
Additional Details:
Nylander Signs 8x9.5 (a must for a deal to get done)
2.
CGY
    Any team, 1st, 3rd, mid level prospect
    3.
    CGY
    1. Broberg, Philip
    2. Campbell, Jack
    3. 2024 1st round pick (EDM)
    4. 2024 2nd round pick (EDM)
    4.
    CGY
      Any Team, 2 or 3 round pick
      DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
      2024
      Logo of the CGY
      Logo of the EDM
      Logo of the CGY
      Logo of the EDM
      Logo of the CGY
      Logo of the CGY
      Logo of the CGY
      2025
      Logo of the FLA
      Logo of the CGY
      Logo of the CGY
      Logo of the CGY
      Logo of the CGY
      Logo of the CGY
      2026
      Logo of the CGY
      Logo of the CGY
      Logo of the CGY
      Logo of the CGY
      Logo of the CGY
      Logo of the CGY
      Logo of the CGY
      ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
      24$83,500,000$72,903,198$0$1,927,500$10,596,802
      Left WingCentreRight Wing
      Logo of the Calgary Flames
      $10,500,000$10,500,000
      LW, RW
      NMC
      UFA - 8
      Logo of the Calgary Flames
      $4,850,000$4,850,000
      C, RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
      $6,962,366$6,962,366
      RW
      NMC
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Calgary Flames
      $2,300,000$2,300,000
      LW, RW, C
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the Calgary Flames
      $7,000,000$7,000,000
      C
      NMC
      UFA - 6
      Logo of the Calgary Flames
      $5,800,000$5,800,000
      RW, LW
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Calgary Flames
      $863,333$863,333
      LW
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the Calgary Flames
      $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
      LW, C
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the Calgary Flames
      $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
      RW
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the Calgary Flames
      $762,500$762,500
      LW, C
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Calgary Flames
      $5,350,000$5,350,000
      C
      NMC
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Calgary Flames
      $3,100,000$3,100,000
      C, LW, RW
      UFA - 2
      Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
      Logo of the Calgary Flames
      $1,237,500$1,237,500
      LD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Calgary Flames
      $4,550,000$4,550,000
      RD
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Calgary Flames
      $813,333$813,333 (Performance Bonus$15,000$15K)
      G
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the Calgary Flames
      $2,500,000$2,500,000
      LD/RD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
      $1,400,000$1,400,000
      RD
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
      $5,000,000$5,000,000
      G
      M-NTC
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
      $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
      LD
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
      $4,150,000$4,150,000
      RD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
      Logo of the Calgary Flames
      $762,500$762,500
      RW, LW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Calgary Flames
      $1,300,000$1,300,000
      C
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Calgary Flames
      $825,000$825,000
      RW
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Calgary Flames
      $762,500$762,500
      LD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Calgary Flames
      $762,500$762,500
      RD
      UFA - 1

      Embed Code

      • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
      • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

      Text-Embed

      Click to Highlight
      Nov. 12, 2023 at 1:10 p.m.
      #1
      Banned
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Oct. 2023
      Posts: 2,981
      Likes: 590
      Leafs quickly decline
      Nov. 12, 2023 at 1:21 p.m.
      #2
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2019
      Posts: 7,126
      Likes: 1,640
      I'm hard pressed to see the value in acquiring 3 flames defensemen (who as we can see this season, are not really paying all that well) for the privilege of giving away Nylander and Liljegren all because the 1 year of Klingberg is looking exactly as expected
      Nov. 12, 2023 at 1:28 p.m.
      #3
      First round bust
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2023
      Posts: 852
      Likes: 352
      I know Coleman is playing well but his age and contract put him in the same category as Garland. I don't think a team is going to claim him off waivers in this capped out league, let alone pay assets for him.

      As much as I liked Markstrom's start, he has been average. He's doing great at stopping medium danger chances, but struggles in both low danger, and high danger chances against. I think he needs to put in a much larger body of work before a team is willing to take a chance on him.

      Toronto doesn't need 3D, also why would Nylander sign for our rebuild? If we're playing a core full of AHL D + Andersson we'll be lit up on most nights.
      Nov. 12, 2023 at 1:58 p.m.
      #4
      Chicago
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2015
      Posts: 7,002
      Likes: 2,852
      You had me convinced in your description, and then I see that Leafs trade.....
      Nov. 12, 2023 at 1:59 p.m.
      #5
      Leafs going to Leafs
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Dec. 2022
      Posts: 9,982
      Likes: 3,018
      So, looking at this trade, you are 50% retention on Z and Tanev, Lilly doesn't go to CGY and CGY is missing a mid to late 1st/2nd
      Nov. 12, 2023 at 2:11 p.m.
      #6
      Future Norris guy
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Aug. 2022
      Posts: 15,605
      Likes: 8,625
      If William Nylander was seeking 8x9.5M he'd already be resigned by now, Very doubtful especially the way he's playing now. That he's taking anything less than 8x10.5M
      Nov. 12, 2023 at 4:28 p.m.
      #7
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2019
      Posts: 38,555
      Likes: 19,692
      Quoting: Bast
      I know Coleman is playing well but his age and contract put him in the same category as Garland. I don't think a team is going to claim him off waivers in this capped out league, let alone pay assets for him.

      As much as I liked Markstrom's start, he has been average. He's doing great at stopping medium danger chances, but struggles in both low danger, and high danger chances against. I think he needs to put in a much larger body of work before a team is willing to take a chance on him.

      Toronto doesn't need 3D, also why would Nylander sign for our rebuild? If we're playing a core full of AHL D + Andersson we'll be lit up on most nights.


      Agree that Coleman has drastically more value to the team than he does on the market.

      Marky has been well above average, he's still got one of the best GSAx and looks very dialed in every game. Vladar played well last year but has really struggled to start this year.

      Agree on the Nylander thing. He's playing great and exactly like he wants that contract but I highly doubt he's interested in playing for a team designed to tank for 5+ years. Wolf is npt ready to be a starter and Campbell sucks so the goaltending is going to be bad. On top of rhat the d-core will be brutal without Weegar (who probably isn't waiving nor is available at all)
      Nov. 12, 2023 at 6:01 p.m.
      #8
      First round bust
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2023
      Posts: 852
      Likes: 352
      Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
      Agree that Coleman has drastically more value to the team than he does on the market.

      Marky has been well above average, he's still got one of the best GSAx and looks very dialed in every game. Vladar played well last year but has really struggled to start this year.

      Agree on the Nylander thing. He's playing great and exactly like he wants that contract but I highly doubt he's interested in playing for a team designed to tank for 5+ years. Wolf is npt ready to be a starter and Campbell sucks so the goaltending is going to be bad. On top of rhat the d-core will be brutal without Weegar (who probably isn't waiving nor is available at all)


      We're mostly on the same page, but Markstrom is 33rd in GSAx. He was the best player on the ice in half his starts, but he still let's in stinkers in a much higher rate than 2 years ago.

      https://moneypuck.com/goalies.htm
      Nov. 12, 2023 at 6:38 p.m.
      #9
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2019
      Posts: 38,555
      Likes: 19,692
      Quoting: Bast
      We're mostly on the same page, but Markstrom is 33rd in GSAx. He was the best player on the ice in half his starts, but he still let's in stinkers in a much higher rate than 2 years ago.

      https://moneypuck.com/goalies.htm


      He's 6th in GSAx on Evolving Hockey
      HNxvUXu.png

      I don't really agree with him letting in stinkers. I admittedly missed the Rangers game but he played great vs St. Louis and was left out to dry/unlucky vs Edmonton and Dallas on most of their goals (ie Robertson's shot being a knuckle shot from hitting Weegar's stick, his follow-through showed he was aiming high. Or Benn's shorty was not his fault at all, terrible coverage from Ras and no backcheck elsewhere).
      Nov. 12, 2023 at 6:50 p.m.
      #10
      First round bust
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2023
      Posts: 852
      Likes: 352
      Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
      He's 6th in GSAx on Evolving Hockey
      HNxvUXu.png

      I don't really agree with him letting in stinkers. I admittedly missed the Rangers game but he played great vs St. Louis and was left out to dry/unlucky vs Edmonton and Dallas on most of their goals (ie Robertson's shot being a knuckle shot from hitting Weegar's stick, his follow-through showed he was aiming high. Or Benn's shorty was not his fault at all, terrible coverage from Ras and no backcheck elsewhere).


      Here are some numbers from a discussion on CalgaryPuck on Nov 9th.

      Quote:
      Low Danger Save % Above Expected

      Last season (min games played: 20)
      - 1st Ullmark, 0.011 (actual: 0.984, expected: 0.973)
      - 16th Skinner, 0.002 (actual: 0.972, expected: 0.971)
      - 25th Markstrom, -0.002 (actual: 0.968, expected: 0.970)
      This season (min games played: 3)
      - 1st DeSmith, 0.018 (actual: 0.992, expected: 0.973)
      - 16th Bobrovsky, 0.006 (actual: 0.977, expected: 0.971)
      - 48th Markstrom, -0.017 (actual: 0.954, expected: 0.971)


      Medium Danger Save % Above Expected

      Last season (min games played: 20)
      - 1st Samsonov, 0.047 (actual: 0.927, expected: 0.880)
      - 16th Bobrovsky, 0.013 (actual: 0.888, expected: 0.876)
      - 38th Markstrom, -0.009 (actual: 0.867, expected: 0.875)
      This season (min games played: 3)
      - 1st Comrie, 0.136 (actual: 1.000, expected: 0.864)
      - 13th Markstrom, 0.032 (actual: 0.907, expected: 0.874)
      - 16th Quick, 0.024 (actual: 0.907, expected: 0.883)


      High Danger Save % Above Expected

      Last season (min games played: 20)
      - 1st Kochetkov, 0.145 (actual: 0.825, expected: 0.680)
      - 16th Saros, 0.074 (actual: 0.757, expected: 0.682)
      - 43rd Markstrom, 0.024 (actual: 0.700, expected: 0.676)
      This season (min games played: 3)
      - 1st Vladar, 0.285 (actual: 1.000, expected: 0.715)
      - 16th Woll, 0.130 (actual: 0.786, expected: 0.655)
      - 32nd Markstrom, 0.081 (actual: 0.781, expected: 0.697)


      It seems Evolving Hockey views it differently. Personally I remember Markstrom making a bunch of great saves, but allowing 1 bad goal each game.
       
      Reply
      To create a post please Login or Register
      Question:
      Options:
      Add Option
      Submit Poll