Leafs decline everyday of the week and twice on Sunday lol why are we adding to the better player to get the worse one? Makes zero sense

Habs decline everyday of the week and twice on Sunday lol why would we giving away a 1st for a small winger we don't need and gonna loose on free agency next year? Makes zero sense

Would cost a first to just to move Anderson

Trades 2 and 3 decline.
Trade 1 I'm okay with.

You’d be trading away a 1st to get out of a bottom 5-10 contract in the whole league. Considering in this trade you’re getting rid of Anderson and adding Kuzmenko while only giving up one 1st round pick, it’s a steal of a trade for Montreal. Canucks would easily decline

Toronto declines the first trade, and the Canucks might also. Garland has been an important player for us this year despite his point totals being down

Second trade is god awful for the Canucks. Easy decline

They have the same amount of points so far this season, with Garland having more P/60 and the better CF% this season, Garland's also paid less and playing with bottom-sixers like Blueger and Joshua, while Bertuzzi is playing with two of the best two-way guys in the game, Tavares and Marner. Garland has been the better player of the two this season.

Leafs still decline lol

Fair, the Leafs get out of their mistake at the end of this year. Ideally, I'd like Vancouver to keep Garland anyway, since he's only overpaid by a million or so, and with the cap going up, it should balance out in the last couple of years of his deal.

Blues probably decline Sunny provides more value to that roster than those assets as of the current moment I write this .