SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sending out feelers

Created by: jazzhandz321
Team: 2023-24 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 15, 2023
Published: Dec. 15, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
The Oleksiak trade is based off of the Ekholm trade, the rest are me spitballing
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Oleksiak, Jamie
  2. 2024 6th round pick (SEA)
SEA
  1. Robertson, Nicholas
  2. Samsonov, Ilya
  3. 2024 1st round pick (TOR)
  4. 2024 4th round pick (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Hayes, Kevin ($1,785,714 retained)
  2. Sundqvist, Oskar
STL
  1. Gambrell, Dylan
  2. Minten, Fraser
  3. 2024 5th round pick (TOR)
3.
TOR
  1. Fleury, Marc-André ($1,750,000 retained)
MIN
    If the Wild are out of the playoff picture come TDL, what's the price they'd be looking at for MAF?
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2024
    Logo of the NYI
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the SEA
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the OTT
    2025
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    2026
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    22$83,500,000$83,457,998$0$0$42,002

    Roster

    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $5,500,000$5,500,000
    LW, RW
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $11,640,250$11,640,250
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $10,903,000$10,903,000
    RW
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the St. Louis Blues
    $1,785,715$1,785,715
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $11,000,000$11,000,000
    C, LW
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $6,962,366$6,962,366
    RW
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $925,000$925,000
    LW, RW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    C, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $2,100,000$2,100,000
    RW, C, LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $775,000$775,000
    LW, RW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $2,400,000$2,400,000
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the St. Louis Blues
    $775,000$775,000
    RW, C
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $7,500,000$7,500,000
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    LD/RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $766,667$766,667
    G
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Seattle Kraken
    $4,600,000$4,600,000
    LD/RD
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    LD/RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Minnesota Wild
    $1,750,000$1,750,000
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $800,000$800,000
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,400,000$1,400,000
    RD
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $775,000$775,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,100,000$1,100,000
    RD
    RFA - 2
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,350,000$1,350,000
    RW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $5,625,000$5,625,000
    LD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $4,687,500$4,687,500
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $4,150,000$4,150,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Taxi Squad
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $775,000$775,000 ($0$0$0$0)
    LW, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $800,000$800,000 ($0$0$0$0)
    C, LW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $762,500$762,500 ($0$0$0$0)
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $834,167$834,167 ($0$0$0$0)
    LW, RW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $775,000$775,000 ($0$0$0$0)
    LD
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $775,000$775,000 ($0$0$0$0)
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $875,000$875,000 ($0$0$0$0)
    G
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Dec. 15, 2023 at 2:34 p.m.
    #1
    FKA Bigtittielarper
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2020
    Posts: 7,728
    Likes: 2,226
    Minten is untouchable so long as they have 1st to spend and zero chance they spend more then 1 1st this year just ain’t gonna happen and I personally wouldn’t do that Seattle trade seems like an overpayment when the guy isn’t even half retained even if he was half retained I wouldn’t want to send Robertson I’d be fine with sending the 1st though
    Dec. 15, 2023 at 2:52 p.m.
    #2
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2019
    Posts: 19,749
    Likes: 7,382
    There is nothing in that blues package that even gets the leafs thinking about adding minten.
    And why do you want MAF? He's washed
    SomeonesOffended liked this.
    Dec. 15, 2023 at 2:53 p.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 324
    Likes: 31
    Quoting: SomeonesOffended
    Minten is untouchable so long as they have 1st to spend and zero chance they spend more then 1 1st this year just ain’t gonna happen and I personally wouldn’t do that Seattle trade seems like an overpayment when the guy isn’t even half retained even if he was half retained I wouldn’t want to send Robertson I’d be fine with sending the 1st though


    Just my opinion, but I think we should be willing to move either/both if we can get pieces with term on defense/3c. I don't think Minten has top 6 potential in the NHL, and his value could potentially be quite high after this tournament.
    jazzhandz321 liked this.
    Dec. 15, 2023 at 2:56 p.m.
    #4
    FKA Bigtittielarper
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2020
    Posts: 7,728
    Likes: 2,226
    Quoting: Robl88
    Just my opinion, but I think we should be willing to move either/both if we can get pieces with term on defense/3c. I don't think Minten has top 6 potential in the NHL, and his value could potentially be quite high after this tournament.


    It ain’t gonna happen how often do team trade their best prospects? The answer is never it’s not gonna happen lol
    Dec. 15, 2023 at 4:09 p.m.
    #5
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 1,098
    Likes: 220
    Quoting: SomeonesOffended
    Minten is untouchable so long as they have 1st to spend and zero chance they spend more then 1 1st this year just ain’t gonna happen and I personally wouldn’t do that Seattle trade seems like an overpayment when the guy isn’t even half retained even if he was half retained I wouldn’t want to send Robertson I’d be fine with sending the 1st though


    Why would Minten be untouchable? His ceiling is what Hayes is currently, which is a middle six forward with bite and size. The only prospect that is untouchable at this point is Cowan IMO.
    mokumboi liked this.
    Dec. 15, 2023 at 4:10 p.m.
    #6
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 1,098
    Likes: 220
    Quoting: JaredOfLondon
    There is nothing in that blues package that even gets the leafs thinking about adding minten.
    And why do you want MAF? He's washed


    MAF is a place holder I guess, I'd rather have a backup making 1.5-2m than Samsonov making 3.5m
    Dec. 15, 2023 at 4:11 p.m.
    #7
    FKA Bigtittielarper
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2020
    Posts: 7,728
    Likes: 2,226
    Quoting: jazzhandz321
    Why would Minten be untouchable? His ceiling is what Hayes is currently, which is a middle six forward with bite and size. The only prospect that is untouchable at this point is Cowan IMO.


    Minten is right there too and leafs said as much yesterday neither one of them are anywhere near on the table this season
    Dec. 15, 2023 at 4:12 p.m.
    #8
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 1,098
    Likes: 220
    Quoting: SomeonesOffended
    Minten is untouchable so long as they have 1st to spend and zero chance they spend more then 1 1st this year just ain’t gonna happen and I personally wouldn’t do that Seattle trade seems like an overpayment when the guy isn’t even half retained even if he was half retained I wouldn’t want to send Robertson I’d be fine with sending the 1st though


    Oleksiak is a legit top four guy, the way Muzzin was for the Leafs. I think the Ekholm trade is a good comparison for a trade between the Leafs and Kraken.
    Dec. 15, 2023 at 4:13 p.m.
    #9
    FKA Bigtittielarper
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2020
    Posts: 7,728
    Likes: 2,226
    Quoting: jazzhandz321
    Oleksiak is a legit top four guy, the way Muzzin was for the Leafs. I think the Ekholm trade is a good comparison for a trade between the Leafs and Kraken.


    Gross overpayment it’s never gonna happen a first half retained or nothing at all
    Dec. 15, 2023 at 4:21 p.m.
    #10
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 1,098
    Likes: 220
    Quoting: SomeonesOffended
    Minten is right there too and leafs said as much yesterday neither one of them are anywhere near on the table this season


    I like Minten as much as the next guy, but you gotta be realistic about what he'll grow into. He's not going to be a 2C and if trading him means getting immediately better, I think that's a move that'd be worth making.

    Cowan is having a season comparable to Marner's D+1 year. Minten is having a good year, but making the World Juniors isn't a lock to be a slam-dunk NHLer.

    Gauthier was also a near PPG player in his D+2 season, and he made the World Jrs roster too. He was a solid player, but you would have never labelled him untouchable back in 2015.
    Dec. 15, 2023 at 4:24 p.m.
    #11
    FKA Bigtittielarper
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2020
    Posts: 7,728
    Likes: 2,226
    Quoting: jazzhandz321
    I like Minten as much as the next guy, but you gotta be realistic about what he'll grow into. He's not going to be a 2C and if trading him means getting immediately better, I think that's a move that'd be worth making.

    Cowan is having a season comparable to Marner's D+1 year. Minten is having a good year, but making the World Juniors isn't a lock to be a slam-dunk NHLer.

    Gauthier was also a near PPG player in his D+2 season, and he made the World Jrs roster too. He was a solid player, but you would have never labelled him untouchable back in 2015.


    It’s never going to happen and nothing you say will change my mind because it came straight from the leafs he’s untouchable
    Dec. 15, 2023 at 4:26 p.m.
    #12
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 1,098
    Likes: 220
    Quoting: SomeonesOffended
    Gross overpayment it’s never gonna happen a first half retained or nothing at all


    Who's someone you'd have the Leafs target? And what would you have them pay to get them?

    Dubas traded for McCabe (@ 50% retained), who is a 4D for a first-round pick. Oleksiak is closer to a 2/3D al a Muzzin or Ekholm. To expect retention and only give up a first isn't realistic at all.
    Dec. 15, 2023 at 4:28 p.m.
    #13
    FKA Bigtittielarper
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2020
    Posts: 7,728
    Likes: 2,226
    Quoting: jazzhandz321
    Who's someone you'd have the Leafs target? And what would you have them pay to get them?

    Dubas traded for McCabe ( 50% retained), who is a 4D for a first-round pick. Oleksiak is closer to a 2/3D al a Muzzin or Ekholm. To expect retention and only give up a first isn't realistic at all.


    Walker tanev anyone who’s on the last year of their deal Oleksiak isn’t even going to be dealt cause he isn’t on the last year of his contract
    KrakBirds23 liked this.
    Dec. 15, 2023 at 4:33 p.m.
    #14
    mokumboi
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2019
    Posts: 29,326
    Likes: 11,373
    Hayes we can certainly talk about. Sunny is almost certainly not going anywhere right now.
    jazzhandz321 liked this.
    Dec. 15, 2023 at 4:35 p.m.
    #15
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 1,098
    Likes: 220
    Quoting: SomeonesOffended
    It’s never going to happen and nothing you say will change my mind because it came straight from the leafs he’s untouchable


    I mean, that's fine. You can believe that he's untouchable, again I believe there's a world where down the line he develops into a shutdown 2/3C like Cirelli.

    I've tried finding where the Leafs said he's untouchable, and there's nothing that comes up. Maybe I'm just not looking at the right places, could you tell me where and when that was made clear?
    Dec. 15, 2023 at 4:43 p.m.
    #16
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 1,098
    Likes: 220
    Quoting: SomeonesOffended
    Walker tanev anyone who’s on the last year of their deal Oleksiak isn’t even going to be dealt cause he isn’t on the last year of his contract



    Muzzin, Ekholm, Lindholm, and Skjei all were traded in season while having term attached to their contracts.

    Walker and Tanev are interesting, but Walker isn't what the Leafs would be looking for, and giving up a first for Tanev excites me less and less the more time goes on.

    The rental market is kind of limited this year, which is why I'd target a guy with term
    Dec. 15, 2023 at 4:45 p.m.
    #17
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 1,098
    Likes: 220
    Quoting: mokumboi
    Hayes we can certainly talk about. Sunny is almost certainly not going anywhere right now.


    That's fair, I know he's a bit of a fan favourite in St. Louis. If the Blues are out of playoff contention come the deadline would Sundqvist still be off the table?
    Dec. 15, 2023 at 6:42 p.m.
    #18
    mokumboi
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2019
    Posts: 29,326
    Likes: 11,373
    Quoting: jazzhandz321
    That's fair, I know he's a bit of a fan favourite in St. Louis. If the Blues are out of playoff contention come the deadline would Sundqvist still be off the table?


    I'd imagine they'll extend him. And yeah, Sunny turned other offers for more money to come back for the minimum.
    jazzhandz321 liked this.
    Dec. 15, 2023 at 6:42 p.m.
    #19
    Marner rocks
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 4,050
    Likes: 893
    Quoting: jazzhandz321
    Why would Minten be untouchable? His ceiling is what Hayes is currently, which is a middle six forward with bite and size. The only prospect that is untouchable at this point is Cowan IMO.


    What do the leafs lack? Forwards with bite, so why trade an ELC contract 3C for next season from a team with major cap issues.
    SomeonesOffended liked this.
    Dec. 15, 2023 at 9:12 p.m.
    #20
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2023
    Posts: 695
    Likes: 266
    Personally I think Seattle would jump at that offer with or without Samsonov. Toronto is going to have to take Gru or Driedger on the return through if Samsonov comes their way.
    Dec. 18, 2023 at 9:10 a.m.
    #21
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 324
    Likes: 31
    Quoting: SomeonesOffended
    It ain’t gonna happen how often do team trade their best prospects? The answer is never it’s not gonna happen lol


    Minten isnt our best prospect, and even if he was, it does happen
    Dec. 18, 2023 at 9:14 a.m.
    #22
    FKA Bigtittielarper
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2020
    Posts: 7,728
    Likes: 2,226
    Quoting: Robl88
    Minten isnt our best prospect, and even if he was, it does happen


    Nope never gonna happen leafs only have a few good prospects they need guys on entry level contracts they came out and said minten and Cowan aren’t going anywhere they also said they aren’t likely to use a first so no doesn’t happen lol
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll