idk if that is enough for Bjorkstrand alone

Drop bjorkstrand and Robertson add a 3rd if needed

Leafs accept easily. I don't see Seattle doing this though.

I would be sad losing Robertson but this would be worth it.

I can't imagine Seattle trading two quality starters for a first and the hope that Robertson becomes a top-6 forward -- not to mention paying Bjorkstrand more than $6 million NOT to play for them. Samsonov is a UFA and Abruzzese is a YTB (Yet To Be).

The Kraken might go for that deal minus Bjorkstrand.

Leafs would then decline that look at what I said above that’s how I’d alter it

LOL. Seattle passes for all reasons cited above. If they are retaining any salary then more picks/high prospects will need to come back to them. Bjorkstrand's on favorable contract that means he probably isn't available. Larsson's got too much term left.

I'd trade Daccord for Samsonov straight up though. Fans here seem to like Daccord but he's not the goalie to build around.

You historically overestimate the trade value of Toronto players. Robertson is the only one of those three players that has a chance of appealing to Seattle. Your proposal is a non-starter. Abruzzese and Daccord are equivalent and Samsonov is a nullity. Seattle isn't giving Larsson away.

I agree with you on everything except Daccord/Samsonov. I don't think Daccord is a bonafide franchise goalie or anything, but Samsonov's numbers this season are atrocious, worse than Grubauer's in fact. Plus he's a UFA at the end of the season, so barring a miraculous midseason turnaround he's not going to help Seattle in any way. By contrast, this is Daccord's first season as a full time NHLer, and he's doing pretty well relative to expectations. I think he can be a good 1B tandem goalie, so all Seattle needs to do is find that 1A netminder to pair with him. That's easier said than done of course, but the point is I'd take Daccord over Samsonov ten times out of ten.

Not disagreeing with any of that but also feel Seattle is just trying to see what can stick. Gru may still be a good goalie but I don't think he works in the defensive structure. Driedger still deserves a look - hopefully in one of the three games this week. Daccord may be a stop gap and he's a hard guy not to like personality wise, and right now he's the one sticking like Jones last year.

I think Seattle's going to spend a lot of time figuring out what goalie sticks and I don't think any of those three is the answer at this point so I'm willing to flip to see what might stick better.

Awful for Seattle.