Tell them the correct value that a player would need to be traded for.
Petterson can be had under 3 conditions:
1.) It is next year and we won't resign
2.) It is this year and the Pens totally fall off
3.) Someone overpays
Guentzel has the same 2 and 3
This is scenario 3 as I don't think the Pens will be bad enough to gain self awareness to sell.
Disagree with me below if you'd like but bring data, I certainly will.
I chose the Devils because I see several people asking about Petterson to NJ
I chose Van because they look good and their top LW (Kuzmenko) does not.
You can sub another team if you'd like but
Petterson = a 1st + A prospect
Guentzel = a 1st + A prospect
Retention on Guentzel is a 2nd
But speculatively Nemec's value is among the highest of all prospects? The small amount of risk does not make him worth less than a 1.5 year rental
I totally agree. His speculative value (his potential) is much higher than Petterson. But, I factored in risk vs a sure thing along with the optics for the Pens and the division rivalry. It is an overpay, 100%. But, IMO that's what it would take to get Petterson.
I totally agree. His speculative value (his potential) is much higher than Petterson. But, I factored in risk vs a sure thing along with the optics for the Pens and the division rivalry. It is an overpay, 100%. But, IMO that's what it would take to get Petterson.
The Devils would never pay that price. You can't just say that it would take an overpay if the other team wouldn't make said overpay
It's indicative of his value. If you don't believe in trading for prospects that's okay to say.
You can have Toffoli 1 for 1 if you like
I agree in trading prospects. But they have less value. That isn't hard to follow. Nemec might be the next Makar. He might be the next Reinhart. I can't say. Neither can you.
The risk of Nemec is that he doesn't pan out and you kept a devaluing asset instead of trading it for another asset that could win you a cup or 2.
You're not factoring in team control. Nemec is team property for years to come, MP is UFA in 1.5. That combined with Nemec's potential and NHL showing makes him by far the more valuable trade asset
Oh sorry. I didn't give you the stats just the rankings. My bad (sincerely)
His number put him in the middle of the pack in the NHL in most stats. I am impressed by his speed and energy but it is too early to say if he will be great, good or average (imo).
Would you like the stats?
He is a 19 year old NHL defenseman who is average at worse. That makes him one of the most valuable assets in the league.
I agree in trading prospects. But they have less value. That isn't hard to follow. Nemec might be the next Makar. He might be the next Reinhart. I can't say. Neither can you.
Nemec is already playing quality NHL hockey that's the thing.
Nemec's low end where he ends up as a high quality bottom pair Dman still provides more surplus value than pettersson simply because of 3 years at ELC+4 years of RFA vs 2 years at 4 mill
You're not factoring in team control. Nemec is team property for years to come, MP is UFA in 1.5. That combined with Nemec's potential and NHL showing makes him by far the more valuable trade asset
It does, which is why this is an overpay. But he is not Makar. He might be someday but he isn't today. Trading for an established elite player has a cost. IMO, this is it. Maybe the Devils cry in 3 years when Petterosn moves on and Nemec is anchoring the Pens blue line? Maybe the laugh when they win 2 cups and Nemec falls off / gets hurt?
He is a 19 year old NHL defenseman who is average at worse. That makes him one of the most valuable assets in the league.
Quoting: dgibb10
Nemec is already playing quality NHL hockey that's the thing.
Nemec's low end where he ends up as a high quality bottom pair Dman still provides more surplus value than pettersson simply because of 3 years at ELC+4 years of RFA vs 2 years at 4 mill
Quoting: dgibb10
7 years of a bottom pair dman for dirt cheap cap wise still has significant value.
Guys. I think we're at an impass. You think he is currently at his floor and his ceiling is (lets say) Makar. What if this is his ceiling? What if, though play or injury, he stays as good as he is right now.
Is he worth more than a top pair shutdown defenseman? Honest question.
It does, which is why this is an overpay. But he is not Makar. He might be someday but he isn't today. Trading for an established elite player has a cost. IMO, this is it. Maybe the Devils cry in 3 years when Petterosn moves on and Nemec is anchoring the Pens blue line? Maybe the laugh when they win 2 cups and Nemec falls off / gets hurt?
That is the risk. On both sides.
Nemec simply isn't the risk you claim. He's playing at a similar level to Pettersson right now.
Guys. I think we're at an impass. You think he is currently at his floor and his ceiling is (lets say) Makar. What if this is his ceiling? What if, though play or injury, he stays as good as he is right now.
Is he worth more than a top pair shutdown defenseman? Honest question.
If this is his ceiling yes he's worth more than pettersson.
Like I said, I currently value him at about 6 mill.
The athletic player value charts has him at 5.5 and Pettersson at 6.1 mill.
It does, which is why this is an overpay. But he is not Makar. He might be someday but he isn't today. Trading for an established elite player has a cost. IMO, this is it. Maybe the Devils cry in 3 years when Petterosn moves on and Nemec is anchoring the Pens blue line? Maybe the laugh when they win 2 cups and Nemec falls off / gets hurt?
That is the risk. On both sides.
I don't think you understand how good Nemec is. There is very little risk for the Penguins and Pettersson for 1.5 years is simply not worth Nemec's insane upside
There’s no world where a rental Guentzel returns nearly that much. That’s significantly more than Debrincat returned
About 2 1sts more of value than Toffoli returned
Show me any example of a rental winger returning this much in a trade. A much more likely and reasonable return is a 1st and a lesser prospect than Willander (probably someone on the level of Raty/Brzustewicz, or maybe Podkolzin if PIT prefers an NHL ready player) and maybe a salary filler
I mean %goals is indicative of how good a defensive pair is. The point is to win games and if you score more than your opponent, you win games. Why don't you give me some metrics you think are important and we and look at a comparison?
No offense (and I sincerely mean that) but if you're an "eye test" person, our discussion isn't going to go anywhere. If you aren't we can talk numbers and stats.
Guys. I think we're at an impass. You think he is currently at his floor and his ceiling is (lets say) Makar. What if this is his ceiling? What if, though play or injury, he stays as good as he is right now.
Is he worth more than a top pair shutdown defenseman? Honest question.
Defensemen who make the NHL and look good at 19-20 years old are few and far between. Defensemen who produced like Nemec did in a pro league at ages 16-18 simply do not exist. He is the only one.
Pettersson is a two year rental and probably worth a 1st. Nemec is worth multiple 1sts at minimum.