yeah I could get behind something like that

Gives us a good 2 way bottom 6 player, a Batherson replacement and a good middle 6 vet

so philly has to pay these 2 guys 13m or the 3 players theyre giving up 10m total... id rather just keep tippet and cates. laughts can be for futures. this trade makes more sense for OTT than for philly

You’re gonna pay for Tippett more than Batherson even thought both can easily get u 65-75pts.

I’d even swap Laughton for Atkinson if it makes more sense . We need a Cates type player in our bottom 6 and you guys are already loaded on bottom 9 forwards

If batherson is an easy 65-75pt guy why hasnt he put up 65-75 points? i get your point, but don't teams typically beleive in what they have first before buying a player that hasnt yet done it, esspecially when they're more expensive.

If I'm in a rebuild, i'd continue to collect assets on cheap contracts, not pay for guys who may or may not live up to their contracts. just my opinion on rebuilds

He put up 64pts last year after coming back from a serious high ankle sprain injury that limited him. Before his injury the year before he was practically a point per game. And this year he’s on a 70pt pace ish

Norris being paid till 2030 with a M-NTC worries me. on pace for what ~48pts this year... too risky for me. again, just my opinion

Neither Greig nor pinto are proven 2Cs so your screwing OTT there, why does philly trade tippet? why does OTT trade Bath?, makes absolutely no sense.

that chych trade is horrifyingly bad for OTT

So what’s going on w Chychrun? I saw something earlier about him not resigning when FA comes or something. It was a brief few mins I had, saw it on twitter/x…can’t remember if it was EF or not who posted it.

Idk man in ottawa ppl always negotiate and give their opinions through the media . Did the same with Debrincat and hard to know which side is right

would you do it without the Tippett/Batherson swap?