SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

Lindholm to Canucks

Created by: CGR
Published: Jan. 22 at 3:40 p.m.
Salary Cap: $83,500,000
Season Days: 87/192 (45%)
Central Registry Determination: This trade has been rejected because the upper limit has been exceeded by one of the trade parties

Logo of the Calgary FlamesCalgary Flames

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Lindholm, EliasCalgary FlamesNHL-$4,850,000011---4682230--
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Cole, IanVancouver CanucksNHL-$3,000,000011---45167--
Di Giuseppe, PhillipVancouver CanucksLTIR-$775,000011---32358--
Lafferty, SamVancouver CanucksNHL-$1,150,000011---46101020--
Podkolzin, VasilyWaivers ExemptVancouver CanucksMinor-$0011---0000--
2025 1st round pick (Logo of the Vancouver CanucksVAN)---100------
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$3,672,6672245643710
Change$700,000133100
Final$4,372,667 (↑)23 (↑)48 (↑)67 (↑)4 (↑)7106-15

Logo of the Vancouver CanucksVancouver Canucks

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Cole, IanVancouver CanucksNHL-$3,000,000011---45167--
Di Giuseppe, PhillipVancouver CanucksLTIR-$775,000011---32358--
Lafferty, SamVancouver CanucksNHL-$1,150,000011---46101020--
Podkolzin, VasilyWaivers ExemptVancouver CanucksMinor-$0011---0000--
2025 1st round pick (Logo of the Vancouver CanucksVAN)---100------
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Lindholm, EliasCalgary FlamesNHL-$4,850,000011---4682230--
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$332,5002346683312
Change-$700,000-1-3-3-100
Final-$367,500 (↓)22 (↓)43 (↓)65 (↓)2 (↓)312-61-5
Jan. 22 at 3:52 p.m.
#1
mv21227
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 10,297
Likes: 9,482
Moving Cole and Lafferty doesn’t make sense for the Canucks. If they move a roster player it’ll likely be Kuzmenko
Jan. 22 at 7:31 p.m.
#2
MoxNix
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 7,768
Likes: 3,276
LOL, no that's not getting Lindholm.
Jan. 22 at 10:09 p.m.
#3
Eli208
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 94
Likes: 21
Calgary says No. Calgary traded big Z because they had to and got more for him than they payed (an extra 5th). Calgary does not like doing division trades unless Calgary has the up. This is not even the 1st in the year Calgary wants
Jan. 22 at 11:32 p.m.
#4
delete
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 1,628
Likes: 159
takes more than a late 1st and podkolzin for Lindy.
Jan. 23 at 10:42 a.m.
#5
svfsdv
Goggles86
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2023
Posts: 376
Likes: 85
Not enough to get Lindholm. And VAN has no room for him under the cap anyways. No purpose for them to pay the big price for him and then lose him to FA
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll