Eli208

Member Since

Jul. 4, 2022

Favourite Team

Calgary Flames

2nd Favourite Team

Colorado Avalanche

Forum Posts

Posts per Day

0.1

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 27 at 7:49 p.m.

Thread: Calgary retains half on both Hanifin and Forbort Hanifin signs long by Calgary

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoxNix</b></div><div>Calgary certainly won't be doing what the title says. Retaining salary on a Hanifin extension. You can't extend a player and then retain on the exiting contract without extending on the extension too. You can however trade a player without an extension and leave it up the acquiring team to sign him to the extension with the extension pre-arranged. You can't make a trade conditional on a player extending after the trade though.</div></div>

You may have misunderstood. Calgary retains on the current contracts not the extension as such a thing is not possible. But by retaining half of the current contract gives Boston the cap space to have him for a solid cup run.
The Winnipeg trade is a depth move for cap space. Kupari does not seem to be performing in Winnipeg and Forbort is a Veteran they could use for a cup push.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 16 at 9:32 p.m.

Thread: Cgy - Van - Tor Adding to the Swedish mafia

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>IjustNEEDaTROYgamble</b></div><div>Sure he isn't LoL
didn't know the Flames management was posting on capfriendly?</div></div>

Calgary wants to keep both Anderson and Hanifin(offer already on the table) Ras (Anderson) is not going anywhere. Look what Conroy said about moving Markstrom.... Conroy does not want to move Anderson and I don't think Anderson wants to go.
But again I am just a dude dressed as another dude **** posting on CapFriendly...🤷
Also if they listened to me and my **** posts they would have got something for Ruzicka but he went a way for free

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 16 at 9:27 p.m.

Thread: Sorry Wheels

Calgary would agree. Unfortunately. Coleman has played very well in the Calgary system. Not sure he will play this well anywhere else or ever again. So yes Calgary would agree. The next team might buy him out and Calgary picks him up again.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 16 at 9:25 p.m.

Thread: Cgy - Van - Tor Adding to the Swedish mafia

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>IjustNEEDaTROYgamble</b></div><div>if you think half this will get Tanev then you really need to stop drinking the bong water there Moxy because this package is pretty close to Andersson's trade value</div></div>

Andersson is not for sale! End of discussion.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 10 at 1:33 a.m.

Thread: Sergachev replacement

Wrong Year on that 1st and I will stop there 🤣

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 10 at 1:32 a.m.

Thread: Rivalry trade

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoxNix</b></div><div>That might work for another team but the oilers have to pay the Battle of Alberta tax too.</div></div>

And that tax is more than a 5th hahaha.
Tanev get at minimum a 2nd from a regular club... Most everyone Calgary wants a 1st minimum...Oilers....Well two 1st is a great starting point hahahaha 😆 ( I hope this ages well 😬)

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 10 at 1:27 a.m.

Thread: Going to happen

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoxNix</b></div><div>Nope, Treliving has to pay more than anyone else except the oilers. It'll take 2024 1st + Timmons/3rd.</div></div>

I do like the sounds of that for sure. However, it has been said the cost for Tanev is at minimum a 2nd. Another 1st round pick to try for a certain someone in the Flames is better to trade with and get that certain young kid who's dad will help him bring a cup home to the north. (Toronto is also not doing as well as Vancouver so that 1st might have more value 🤷)

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 10 at 1:23 a.m.

Thread: LA needs goaltending

NO!!!

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 10 at 1:22 a.m.

Thread: Adhering to the rumours

Post where you found this rumour

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 10 at 1:21 a.m.

Thread: Markstrom a Devil

I need not say a thing....other than Markstrom is the only thing keeping the Flames in the race....This offer is enticing for a club that does not want to move Markstrom in anyway

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 10 at 1:19 a.m.

Thread: Carolina finally gets stable goaltending

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>evelutions2</b></div><div>Canes gladly pass.</div></div>

As does Calgary....
Please go back to the drawing board....
I have from time to time!

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 10 at 1:18 a.m.

Thread: Treliving Leafs go all in

This needs adjustment for sure.....but....

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 10 at 1:17 a.m.

Thread: NJ satisfies needs

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>Retain to about 3.8 mill and it works for jersey</div></div>

Calgary says no anyways. Calgary does not want to move either of those players....the 1st is enticing though....
Convince me

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 10 at 1:13 a.m.

Thread: Markstrom to Canes

This is interesting!!!!!! Best deal is when both parties are uncomfortable but happy in their own way... . justify how you think it works. Upgrade that second to a 1st too and drop Raanta if we can.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 10 at 1:10 a.m.

Thread: POSSIBLE

Markstrom stays in Calgary! Conroy said already the offer for him has to big massive before they even consider approaching Markstrom to wave his no trade clause. This is not even worth picking the phone up! (I have posted garbage trades too from time to time too)

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 10 at 1:01 a.m.

Thread: Realistic

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DevilsInDisguise</b></div><div>SOLD

I'll drive him to the airport myself</div></div>

Calgary agrees if you move that 1st to a 2024 not a 2025 and also try and balance for Mercer or Holtz.
Look at Lindholm's return Hanifin is close to that.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 10 at 12:58 a.m.

Thread: We made a mistake Naz and were sorry

Interesting...justify it for me

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 10 at 12:57 a.m.

Thread: Big swing

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoxNix</b></div><div>Big swing?! More like whiffing a bunt attempt!</div></div>

Not happening!! Look at Lindholm's return and it is said Hanifin could bring the same return on his own. Calgary wants draft picks and futures....

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 6 at 8:05 p.m.

Thread: Not a lot of picks for Toronto

This should definitely be considered! As the leafs are in wild card spot

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 3 at 4:32 a.m.

Thread: Backlund Hanafin for Lysell Poitras

This is a pipe dream that will/should never happen!!
Lindholm was a good trade 1 asset for 5. This is garbage sorry!!! All the players sent Cal way are not what they need minus Lysell so build off that guy and see what people say

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 3 at 4:30 a.m.

Thread: LaK - Cgy Markying his way to LaLa land

**** NO!!!
Sorry.
But not happening at all. Read the room. Conroy already said you have to give the flames the moon to get Markstrom that is not even close!!

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 3 at 4:26 a.m.

Thread: trade

Absolutely ****ing not!!
Again read the ****ing room. Conroy already said he ain't moving Markstrom unless teams offer the moon for him...
This is not even close!!!
Guys and things Calgary does not want or need for a goaltender how holds his team in playoff contention!
Plus a stay at home defenseman who has constantly played his game and you asking for them for free.... Ya no other teams have offered better

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsJan. 31 at 7:45 p.m.

Thread: Cal-EDM-TOR 3 Way Trade

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoxNix</b></div><div>Troll</div></div>

Clearly an Oilers Fan! Never happening! Lol😆

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsJan. 23 at 5:28 a.m.

Thread: Calgary retains 50 of both players and does a sign and trade for both players

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>turtlemountain</b></div><div>Cap doesn’t work for Colorado next season.

You just gave up a young top 4 defenseman and functionally 3 1sts to get two players that you can’t fit in your cap structure long term.

Awful trade for Colorado. Take a look at the other team’s cap sheet first.</div></div>

Not sure you caught what I was saying. Both players are signed for extensions. Yes Colorado would tap LTIR but that is no different today. They may have to trade some guys to make it work but most of those guy are already LTIR. If Colorado wanted Lindholm this is the cost. End of discussion! Full stop Colorado wants Lindholm it costs.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsJan. 23 at 5:23 a.m.

Thread: Naz for Brodie take 2

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rhea</b></div><div>Yeah 6 more years of Naz for 7 is a steal for a capped.out team.</div></div>

Naz has done wonders for the youth movement in Calgary.
Yes Calgary takes Naz for all of it. The buyout term for the last few years is awesome as well. Naz stays for sure.

12 Next

Page 1

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE