SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Brad Needs to Think in This Way

Created by: WFW
Team: 2023-24 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 4, 2024
Published: Feb. 4, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Please Brad, sell off UFAs and bring in guys with term. Severson is probably very optimistic and/or stupid.
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. 2024 3rd round pick (NJD)
  2. 2026 2nd round pick (NJD)
Additional Details:
3rd for Jones, 2nd for Brodie with retention
NJD
  1. Brodie, TJ ($2,500,000 retained)
  2. Jones, Martin
2.
TOR
  1. Janmark, Mattias
  2. 2024 2nd round pick (EDM)
  3. 2026 4th round pick (EDM)
EDM
  1. Bertuzzi, Tyler ($2,750,000 retained)
3.
TOR
  1. Smith, Craig
  2. 2025 3rd round pick (DAL)
  3. 2026 3rd round pick (DAL)
DAL
  1. Domi, Max ($500,000 retained)
4.
CBJ
  1. Reaves, Ryan
  2. Timmins, Conor
  3. 2024 1st round pick (TOR)
  4. 2024 3rd round pick (NYI)
5.
TOR
  1. Larsson, Adam ($1,000,000 retained)
SEA
  1. Lagesson, William
  2. Niemelä, Topi
  3. 2025 3rd round pick (TOR)
  4. 2026 2nd round pick (NJD)
  5. 2026 3rd round pick (DAL)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
2025
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2026
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,500,000$82,856,450$0$0$643,550
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$796,667$796,667
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,400,000$2,400,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$762,500$762,500
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$7,500,000$7,500,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$6,250,000$6,250,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,550,000$3,550,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,400,000$1,400,000
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$766,667$766,667
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,687,500$4,687,500
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,150,000$4,150,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 4 at 7:15 p.m.
#1
Nah.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,460
Likes: 4,340
CBJ accept.
WFW liked this.
Feb. 4 at 7:50 p.m.
#2
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,272
Likes: 11,348
Heh. You're so generous to the first four, and then the Seattle offer is just sad.
CD282 liked this.
Feb. 4 at 7:53 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 330
It’s not a bad price for Bertuzzi but not the right type of winger for the Oilers. Oilers say no to target better fits. There’s only one RW slot needing to be filled, and they won’t be using Bertuzzi to till that spot.
CD282 liked this.
Feb. 4 at 8:29 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 1,712
Quoting: dopplsan
CBJ accept.


Agree, but Severson doesn't. He signed an 8-year deal with a full NTC for a reason, I doubt he's waiving less than a season in, even after the team's not so good bad terrible boo hiss year.
Feb. 4 at 10:55 p.m.
#5
SkateOrDie
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 333
Quoting: dopplsan
CBJ accept.


Quoting: CaseyFlyman
Agree, but Severson doesn't. He signed an 8-year deal with a full NTC for a reason, I doubt he's waiving less than a season in, even after the team's not so good bad terrible boo hiss year.


I doubt it.
CBJ is toward the bottom of the league in revenue they don't want to pay Reaves 1.3 million to sit on the monsters.
If TOR took out Reaves, you probably got a deal.
Feb. 5 at 9:42 a.m.
#6
Nah.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,460
Likes: 4,340
Edited Feb. 5 at 10:15 a.m.
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
I doubt it.
CBJ is toward the bottom of the league in revenue they don't want to pay Reaves 1.3 million to sit on the monsters.
If TOR took out Reaves, you probably got a deal.


To get out of a Severson deal that was made to please Babcock, I think they’d consider it. The dollar figure on Reaves isn’t *awful*, it’s the term.

Buy him out or put him on waivers. Bound to be some rock-headed GM who convinces themselves they need to add some Grit™️ to their team. Hell, Treliving convinced Leafs ownership it was worth three years and $4M.

Quoting: CaseyFlyman
Agree, but Severson doesn't. He signed an 8-year deal with a full NTC for a reason, I doubt he's waiving less than a season in, even after the team's not so good bad terrible boo hiss year.


Given CBJ were supposed to be, if not a bit better than they are now, at least not such a dysfunctional ****-show, I’m not so sure he wouldn’t, TBH. As long as TOR has Matthews, they’re contending. With CBJ where they are right now, who knows.

If he signed that contract because he loves Cbus and being a Blue Jacket, then sure, he stays. But I feel it was more to just have control over where he could be dealt.
CaseyFlyman liked this.
Feb. 5 at 10:31 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 116
Likes: 55
I can't see Seattle trading away their top pair D-man for an AHL level defenseman, a prospect defenseman, and scraps of draft picks.
CD282 and mokumboi liked this.
Feb. 5 at 10:59 a.m.
#8
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,272
Likes: 11,348
Whoa, I just noticed your plan to pair Severson on the top pairing with Rielly. Yikes... that would turn out how you wanted anyway, man.
WFW liked this.
Feb. 5 at 6:22 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 114
Likes: 62
Dallas declines. Losing Smith downgrades our pk. Domi downgrades our team defense. We are fine offensively.
WFW liked this.
Feb. 5 at 7:55 p.m.
#10
SkateOrDie
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 333
Quoting: dopplsan
To get out of a Severson deal that was made to please Babcock, I think they’d consider it. The dollar figure on Reaves isn’t *awful*, it’s the term.

Buy him out or put him on waivers. Bound to be some rock-headed GM who convinces themselves they need to add some Grit™️ to their team. Hell, Treliving convinced Leafs ownership it was worth three years and $4M.



Given CBJ were supposed to be, if not a bit better than they are now, at least not such a dysfunctional ****-show, I’m not so sure he wouldn’t, TBH. As long as TOR has Matthews, they’re contending. With CBJ where they are right now, who knows.

If he signed that contract because he loves Cbus and being a Blue Jacket, then sure, he stays. But I feel it was more to just have control over where he could be dealt.


I don't think that is true on CBJ. Severson is at least serviceable and helps fill a role in CBJ. Reaves is just dead weight. If it was as simple as putting him on waivers and someone pick him up, he wouldn't be on TOR now.

TOR has deep pockets, CBJ does not. They are a lot more careful on their cap. They aren't adverse to spending to help the team, but they aren't taking on dead cap.
Feb. 5 at 9:20 p.m.
#11
Nah.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,460
Likes: 4,340
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
I don't think that is true on CBJ. Severson is at least serviceable and helps fill a role in CBJ. Reaves is just dead weight. If it was as simple as putting him on waivers and someone pick him up, he wouldn't be on TOR now.

TOR has deep pockets, CBJ does not. They are a lot more careful on their cap. They aren't adverse to spending to help the team, but they aren't taking on dead cap.


I guess the counter to that is term. Severson is serviceable and fills a role, but you’re dealing with him for seven more years, at an annual salary that is almost 4x the total value of Reaves’ contract, particularly in a window where younger and more cap-fitting options can fill in.

You’re also asking a professional NHL franchise to take on a few million in extra cash for purposes of saving potential bad value down the road. CBJ aren’t TOR, but it’s not like they’re paying players in crackers, my dude
Feb. 5 at 9:27 p.m.
#12
SkateOrDie
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 333
Quoting: dopplsan
I guess the counter to that is term. Severson is serviceable and fills a role, but you’re dealing with him for seven more years, at an annual salary that is almost 4x the total value of Reaves’ contract, particularly in a window where younger and more cap-fitting options can fill in.

You’re also asking a professional NHL franchise to take on a few million in extra cash for purposes of saving potential bad value down the road. CBJ aren’t TOR, but it’s not like they’re paying players in crackers, my dude


1st if you think Severson is the problem on that defense you aren't paying attention.
2nd the defense market sucks. So many teams are running AHL level players it's not even funny. Hell CBJ gave Gudbranson 4x4 because the market is garbage. Here you are thinking they can just "replace" him. and should do so for basically nothing but taking back a cap dump in Reaves.
Defensemen aren't goalies. They have value.
He's not a cap dump. You should get that thought out of your head as soon as possible.
If there were younger more "cap fitting" options the whole league would be using them. Instead everyone is looking for a capable defenseman and guys like Jack Johnson still have a job and Guddy is getting 4x4 contracts.

Now if you want to talk about moving Guddy for Reaves, I might listen but your offer is ridiculous.
Feb. 6 at 5:52 a.m.
#13
Nah.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,460
Likes: 4,340
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
1st if you think Severson is the problem on that defense you aren't paying attention.
2nd the defense market sucks. So many teams are running AHL level players it's not even funny. Hell CBJ gave Gudbranson 4x4 because the market is garbage. Here you are thinking they can just "replace" him. and should do so for basically nothing but taking back a cap dump in Reaves.
Defensemen aren't goalies. They have value.
He's not a cap dump. You should get that thought out of your head as soon as possible.
If there were younger more "cap fitting" options the whole league would be using them. Instead everyone is looking for a capable defenseman and guys like Jack Johnson still have a job and Guddy is getting 4x4 contracts.

Now if you want to talk about moving Guddy for Reaves, I might listen but your offer is ridiculous.


- Never said Severson was the problem? But also if you think he’s the only thing propping it up, you aren’t paying attention.

Not open to trading because he’s bad, but because his contract is not likely to age well and was signed under different circumstances - Jarmo making the poor decision to trade and sign for a guy as if their window of contention is right now. CBJ have a number of good prospects coming up the chain who can fill his role as a middle-pairing D.

- “The defense market sucks” actually inclines me to trade him even more. If you’re telling me I could put Severson on the market and he’d represent the top-end of it, I’m putting myself in a position to get a prime asset.

You’re basically making the point to me that CBJ shouldn’t settle on a trade like this for Severson, and they can/should get more in a seller’s market. Problem is, moving that kind of cap in a league that is still flat-capped is very difficult; there needs to be money-in-money-out.
mokumboi liked this.
Feb. 6 at 6:12 a.m.
#14
SkateOrDie
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 333
Quoting: dopplsan
- Never said Severson was the problem? But also if you think he’s the only thing propping it up, you aren’t paying attention.

Not open to trading because he’s bad, but because his contract is not likely to age well and was signed under different circumstances - Jarmo making the poor decision to trade and sign for a guy as if their window of contention is right now. CBJ have a number of good prospects coming up the chain who can fill his role as a middle-pairing D.

- “The defense market sucks” actually inclines me to trade him even more. If you’re telling me I could put Severson on the market and he’d represent the top-end of it, I’m putting myself in a position to get a prime asset.

You’re basically making the point to me that CBJ shouldn’t settle on a trade like this for Severson, and they can/should get more in a seller’s market. Problem is, moving that kind of cap in a league that is still flat-capped is very difficult; there needs to be money-in-money-out.


you think he's a bad contract on the team. I don't think he is.
Those young players need stability around them and on the back end.
He brings that. It's not like defensemen are just going to "go bad" past 30. The vast majority of them play fairly well into their mid 30s. It's not a horrible contract.

So the whole isn't going to age well argument doesn't mean much. You need defensemen who can help a young forward group in CBJ. 6 of their top 9 are 23 or younger.
Next year with them drafting top 5 it will probably be 7.
You need those vets to provide not only leadership but also stability in the play. If the game is shaky behind them things fall apart.
Which is why I say if you want Guddy I'm sure they could make a deal. But I don't see them moving out a stable guy for a young developing core as it's hard for them to replace that.
If they did move him out, you are looking at it having to be a really good deal. Not one they are taking back a cap dump, etc...

You have to realize CBJ isn't the most attractive place to land free agents. So it's not like they can easily replace guys on the market.
It's why they tend to develop their own players. Between not being a draw and not being deep pockets that's how it is.
But they need to have that stability to help all those young players grow. It's one of the arguments as to why Boon Jenner is more valuable to CBJ than anywhere else.
On the backend for CBJ Severson, Provorov and Werenski are the guys who can provide that stability. Everyone else is sketchy at best. You'd leave them with 2 defensemen.
Feb. 17 at 10:48 a.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2021
Posts: 209
Likes: 49
Quoting: mokumboi
Whoa, I just noticed your plan to pair Severson on the top pairing with Rielly. Yikes... that would turn out how you wanted anyway, man.


Thats an error, Larsson pair #1, Severson Pair #2
mokumboi liked this.
Feb. 17 at 10:49 a.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2021
Posts: 209
Likes: 49
Quoting: SaucePass
Dallas declines. Losing Smith downgrades our pk. Domi downgrades our team defense. We are fine offensively.


Was just thinking of Cap implications for Dallas as I don't follow them closely. When they do inevitably pick someone up at the TDL, who would they send out?
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll