SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Intriguing

Created by: OldSenileGuy
Team: 2023-24 New York Rangers
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 5, 2024
Published: Feb. 5, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I saw someone propose this deal on Twitter and not gonna lie, it sounded very intriguing.

Ryan Johansen has been having a sub-par year for Colorado, but was much better playing for Lavi. His cap hit is higher than Goodrow, but expires after next year.

Not sure if Colorado needs "bottom 6 grit", but in terms of cap hit, Goodrow gives them $400k of space this year and next year (vs what they'd have with RyJo), and by the time 2025-26 rolls around, the cap will have gone up enough that Goodrow's cap hit will be more reasonable for the type of player he is.

Rangers can throw in a low pick or prospect to sweeten the deal, and this would let them spend more to upgrade at that 1RW position at the deadline. (Eberle?)

Thoughts?
Trades
COL
  1. Goodrow, Barclay
  2. Pajuniemi, Lauri [Reserve List]
  3. 2025 5th round pick (MIN)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
2025
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
2026
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$83,500,000$78,708,249$610,892$882,500$4,791,751
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the New York Rangers
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Rangers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$11,642,857$11,642,857
LW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,325,000$2,325,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$828,333$828,333 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,000,000$4,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$800,000$800,000 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
RW
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$800,000$800,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$762,500$762,500
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$787,500$787,500
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,872,000$3,872,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the New York Rangers
$5,666,667$5,666,667
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$8,000,000$8,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$825,000$825,000 (Performance Bonus$100,000$100K)
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$825,000$825,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the New York Rangers
$812,500$812,500
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$4,437,500$4,437,500
C, LW
UFA - 4

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 5 at 2:08 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,440
Likes: 6,060
Avs arent taking on 2 extra years of a cap dump. Worst case Avs will pay to dump Johansen - it would cost significantly more to dump Goodrow with that extra term. A depth player and a late pick doesnt make up for that
MeetYourMakar, LaTornade, hero9154 and 1 other person liked this.
Feb. 5 at 2:10 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 2,830
Likes: 2,481
It would work out better for the Avs to buyout RyJo than taking on Goodrow. I appreciate the new idea though
LaTornade and TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 5 at 2:13 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 399
Likes: 126
That's the thing - I haven't watch many Avalanche games this year so I don't know if RyJo's performance is more "disappointing" or "useless"

Goodrow isn't a pure cap dump - he's still a useful player, just not at that cap hit.
Fox_Czar_Cup liked this.
Feb. 5 at 2:14 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,192
Likes: 1,654
Avs are set on bottom 6 guys, after need to add a too 6 player.. next years cap increase is already allocated to landeskogs return. Even then they're probably over.

Parise cogliano oloffson kovalenko O'Connor kirivanta colton wood macdermid meyers and tufte all fit into our bottom 6 and if we don't move ryjo then he's there too.

Colorado needs someone to.play in between lehkonen and nichushkin and a decent backup goalie
TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 5 at 2:15 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,192
Likes: 1,654
Quoting: OldSenileGuy
That's the thing - I haven't watch many Avalanche games this year so I don't know if RyJo's performance is more "disappointing" or "useless"

Goodrow isn't a pure cap dump - he's still a useful player, just not at that cap hit.


Disappointing
TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 5 at 2:16 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 38
Likes: 25
Quoting: MeetYourMakar
It would work out better for the Avs to buyout RyJo than taking on Goodrow. I appreciate the new idea though


I love the grit Goodrow brings, but the biggest issue is term.
Avs fans will all agree the Ryjo hasn't worked out but he only has one year left. He is still VERY solid in the dot!

The only way this would work, is if Goodrow could be relied on, solely as a C. Avs don't need Wingers.

All in all, there will be better options available down the road, for the Avs to dump Ryjo.
TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 5 at 2:27 p.m.
#7
B
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 8,016
Likes: 1,458
We are also better off buying out or retaining on Goody than this
Feb. 5 at 2:32 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,500
Likes: 9,129
There’s nothing intriguing about COL taking a really bad contract. This is straight troll post material.
Feb. 5 at 8:44 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,642
Likes: 4,598
Term is the biggest issue here. Avs can't afford to be taking on that term for Goodrow. Add to that positional need etc and it should be an easy pass.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll