SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Flames trades

Created by: AdamL188
Team: 2023-24 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 11, 2024
Published: Feb. 11, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Feedback always appreciated
Trades
1.
CGY
  1. Bloom, Josh
  2. 2025 2nd round pick (VAN)
  3. 2025 4th round pick (VAN)
VAN
  1. Tanev, Christopher ($2,250,000 retained)
2.
CGY
  1. Faksa, Radek
  2. Lundkvist, Nils
  3. 2024 1st round pick (DAL)
  4. 2025 3rd round pick (DAL)
Additional Details:
(3rd becomes a 2024 2nd if Stars make 2nd round)
DAL
  1. Hanifin, Noah ($2,000,000 retained)
Additional Details:
8x7.25 in place
3.
CGY
  1. 2024 3rd round pick (EDM)
4.
CGY
  1. Boqvist, Adam
  2. 2025 7th round pick (CBJ)
CBJ
  1. Vladar, Daniel
  2. 2025 2nd round pick (VAN)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CGY
2025
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CBJ
2026
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,500,000$80,314,999$0$1,927,500$3,185,001
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$10,500,000$10,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,100,000$3,100,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,800,000$5,800,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$3,250,000$3,250,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$775,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,300,000$1,300,000
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$813,333$813,333 (Performance Bonus$15,000$15K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$775,000
RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW, C
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 11 at 7:55 p.m.
#1
Future Norris guy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 15,605
Likes: 8,625
Reports are that Hanifin is seeking closer to 8 x 8 Faska is a dump and Lundkvist is a bottom pairing RHD. Nill very rarely trades 1st plus this offer would easily be beaten elsewhere.
SomeonesOffended liked this.
Feb. 11 at 8:33 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 490
Quoting: MoSeider53
Reports are that Hanifin is seeking closer to 8 x 8 Faska is a dump and Lundkvist is a bottom pairing RHD. Nill very rarely trades 1st plus this offer would easily be beaten elsewhere.


Yeah if we're taking back Faksa one of there good prospects would have to be included.
Feb. 11 at 8:52 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 3,792
Likes: 1,208
Canucks will take the Chris Tanev trade.
Feb. 11 at 9:00 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,938
Likes: 729
My only problem from a DAL perspective is they already have Miro, Harley, and Lindell as LHD. I know Miro can also play RD and has been doing that the last two years, but I'd be interested in trying to get him back to LD if at all possible. Doing this obviously doesn't help. I also just don't think they have that kind of money next year with other pieces needing contracts, like Duchene and Harley. Faksa going as a cap dump definitely helps, but I don't know.
Feb. 11 at 10:58 p.m.
#5
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 6,871
Likes: 1,868
We’ll get better for Tanev (at least a 1st or 2nd + Top Prospect)

Hanifin should bring a similar package to what Lindholm fetched

Duehr holds no Trade Value. He cleared Waivers a couple weeks ago

Boqvist = Vladar in value, so they’d be one for one, but we don’t want/need Boqvist. We’d need a Big Physical Shut Down RD like Peeke more than an inconsistent offensive one who doesn’t play Defence in Boqvist. Only Boqvist I’d want on the Flames is Jesper
Feb. 11 at 11:57 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 834
AZ (or anyone) is not giving a 3rd for a 26yo 4th line playing 8m game
Feb. 12 at 9:59 a.m.
#7
Former NHL Executive
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2023
Posts: 710
Likes: 161
Quoting: KingofRnR
We’ll get better for Tanev (at least a 1st or 2nd + Top Prospect)

Hanifin should bring a similar package to what Lindholm fetched

Duehr holds no Trade Value. He cleared Waivers a couple weeks ago

Boqvist = Vladar in value, so they’d be one for one, but we don’t want/need Boqvist. We’d need a Big Physical Shut Down RD like Peeke more than an inconsistent offensive one who doesn’t play Defence in Boqvist. Only Boqvist I’d want on the Flames is Jesper


You are getting a 2nd for him. FFS man.
Feb. 12 at 10:03 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 2,176
Likes: 1,881
Quoting: KingofRnR
We’ll get better for Tanev (at least a 1st or 2nd + Top Prospect)

Hanifin should bring a similar package to what Lindholm fetched

Duehr holds no Trade Value. He cleared Waivers a couple weeks ago

Boqvist = Vladar in value, so they’d be one for one, but we don’t want/need Boqvist. We’d need a Big Physical Shut Down RD like Peeke more than an inconsistent offensive one who doesn’t play Defence in Boqvist. Only Boqvist I’d want on the Flames is Jesper


For Tanev: 1st + Top Prospect might be rich, but a 2nd + Top Prospect should absolutely be in play.

Agree on Hanifin and Duehr, although players that clear waivers do gain a little value since teams can then send them down if they trade for them without needing waivers (ex: Robinson to Buffalo for a conditional 7th). Not a 3rd, but a 7th would be possible.

Boqvist ~= Vladar, the difference certainly isn't a 2nd. Columbus isn't really in a position to trade for Vladar right now, since we'd be right back to 3 goalies. Probably an offseason move if anything. You could absolutely have Peeke; for Vladar, for a mid-rounder, for free, just take him.
Feb. 12 at 12:19 p.m.
#9
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 6,871
Likes: 1,868
Quoting: CaseyFlyman
For Tanev: 1st + Top Prospect might be rich, but a 2nd + Top Prospect should absolutely be in play.

Agree on Hanifin and Duehr, although players that clear waivers do gain a little value since teams can then send them down if they trade for them without needing waivers (ex: Robinson to Buffalo for a conditional 7th). Not a 3rd, but a 7th would be possible.

Boqvist ~= Vladar, the difference certainly isn't a 2nd. Columbus isn't really in a position to trade for Vladar right now, since we'd be right back to 3 goalies. Probably an offseason move if anything. You could absolutely have Peeke; for Vladar, for a mid-rounder, for free, just take him.

Yes, that’s what I meant. Either or

Sure, perhaps a 7th for Duehr, but that’s doubtful

We agree 👍 Peeke is intriguing, maybe he just needs a change of scenery and wouldn’t be a terribly expensive 3-RD. Like what I see in Pachal so far and/or might pursue Kovacevik first, but I’m curious about Peeke
CaseyFlyman liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll