SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Awesome roster very expensive

Created by: Altar7358
Team: 2023-24 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 12, 2024
Published: Feb. 12, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Tons of assets to give up which really doesn’t seem like the avs style but this roster would be absolutely nasty. 2 100 point players on the first line followed by 2 point per game players on the 2nd line and if landy is able to pull off a miracle and come back at a 3rd line level this team is ridiculous.
Free Agent Signings
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Henrique, Adam
1$1,456,250
Trades
1.
COL
  1. Carrick, Sam
Additional Details:
Henrique 50% retained
ANA
  1. Olausson, Oskar
  2. 2024 5th round pick (SEA)
  3. 2025 1st round pick (COL)
2.
COL
    50 percent retained Henrique
    MIN
    1. 2024 4th round pick (COL)
    3.
    COL
    1. Guentzel, Jake ($2,000,000 retained)
    PIT
    1. Gulyayev, Mikhail [Reserve List]
    2. Johansen, Ryan
    3. 2024 1st round pick (COL)
    4. 2025 3rd round pick (COL)
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2024
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    2025
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    2026
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$83,500,000$80,468,750$637,500$0$3,031,250

    Roster

    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $4,500,000$4,500,000
    LW, RW
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $12,600,000$12,600,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $9,250,000$9,250,000
    RW, C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $2,500,000$2,500,000
    LW, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Henrique, Adam
    $1,456,250$1,456,250
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $6,125,000$6,125,000
    RW, LW
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $825,000$825,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $4,000,000$4,000,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $1,050,000$1,050,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $825,000$825,000
    LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $425,000$425,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $2,500,000$2,500,000
    LW
    UFA - 6
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $4,100,000$4,100,000
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $9,000,000$9,000,000
    RD
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $3,400,000$3,400,000
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $4,500,000$4,500,000
    RD
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $775,000$775,000
    G
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $3,850,000$3,850,000
    LD/RD
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $775,000$775,000
    LD
    UFA - 1
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $825,000$825,000
    LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $775,000$775,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $7,000,000$7,000,000
    LW, C
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $775,000$775,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Feb. 12 at 6:52 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2022
    Posts: 514
    Likes: 328
    Very likely to rich for the avs type of deadline but this team would be amazing and I think could rival that 2021-2022 avs team on paper
    Feb. 12 at 6:53 p.m.
    #2
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 3,632
    Likes: 1,271
    I think it takes more for Guentzel. The 1st will end up being really late and Johansen will be extra cap for us. I think add another 1st and we'd consider.
    pensgm liked this.
    Feb. 12 at 6:56 p.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2022
    Posts: 1,638
    Likes: 550
    Take out Guentzel and it’s fair. To add Guentzel is another 1st and top prospect. To add 2 million in retention is another 2nd rd pick.
    pensfan21 liked this.
    Feb. 12 at 7:07 p.m.
    #4
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 3,632
    Likes: 1,271
    Quoting: Hockeyfan1234
    Take out Guentzel and it’s fair. To add Guentzel is another 1st and top prospect. To add 2 million in retention is another 2nd rd pick.


    Agreed, I think with Johansen for Guentzel and retention it would take two 1sts and a decent prospect
    Feb. 12 at 7:08 p.m.
    #5
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2022
    Posts: 514
    Likes: 328
    Quoting: Hockeyfan1234
    Take out Guentzel and it’s fair. To add Guentzel is another 1st and top prospect. To add 2 million in retention is another 2nd rd pick.

    That’s comical. Thanks for the laugh
    TJTwolf liked this.
    Feb. 12 at 7:10 p.m.
    #6
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2022
    Posts: 1,638
    Likes: 550
    Quoting: Altar7358
    That’s comical. Thanks for the laugh


    What’s comical is this ACGM lol
    Feb. 12 at 7:13 p.m.
    #7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2020
    Posts: 11,483
    Likes: 9,112
    Quoting: Hockeyfan1234
    Take out Guentzel and it’s fair. To add Guentzel is another 1st and top prospect. To add 2 million in retention is another 2nd rd pick.


    You think a team is going to pay a 1st, a guy just drafted in the 1st and a 3rd rd pick to take RyJo. What are you smoking?
    TJTwolf liked this.
    Feb. 12 at 7:16 p.m.
    #8
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2022
    Posts: 514
    Likes: 328
    Quoting: Hockeyfan1234
    What’s comical is this ACGM lol


    You just said you wanted 3 firsts a 2nd and a 3rd for a rental and a cap dump lol you don’t know what you’re talking about. Josh Bailey with a higher AAV that had a worse buyout cost just got dumped for a 2nd
    TJTwolf liked this.
    Feb. 12 at 7:18 p.m.
    #9
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2022
    Posts: 514
    Likes: 328
    Quoting: Xqb15a
    You think a team is going to pay a 1st, a guy just drafted in the 1st and a 3rd rd pick to take RyJo. What are you smoking?

    If he wanted like a 2nd over the 3rd sure I wouldn’t necessarily agree but that’s at least reasonable that’s just insane levels of being a homer
    TJTwolf liked this.
    Feb. 12 at 7:19 p.m.
    #10
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2022
    Posts: 1,638
    Likes: 550
    Quoting: Xqb15a
    You think a team is going to pay a 1st, a guy just drafted in the 1st and a 3rd rd pick to take RyJo. What are you smoking?


    RyJo is a 4 million cap hit for the next season and a half, the guy just drafted in the 1st rd was drafted 31st and has a lot less value than a player picked 15th, much less a top 10 pick. Also, the pens have MP, Graves, POJ, Smith, Pickering, Rathbone, Ludvig that are all either young and/or signed long term on the left side. A LD prospect is probably the LAST thing the pens need.
    So to answer your question…not whatever it is you and the ACGM creator are smoking.
    Feb. 12 at 7:24 p.m.
    #11
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2022
    Posts: 1,638
    Likes: 550
    Quoting: Altar7358
    You just said you wanted 3 firsts a 2nd and a 3rd for a rental and a cap dump lol you don’t know what you’re talking about. Josh Bailey with a higher AAV that had a worse buyout cost just got dumped for a 2nd


    RyJo’s buyout in the 2nd year would be worse than Bailey’s buyout in the 2nd year. The pens are also not exactly in a position to be taking on contracts for the purpose of buying them out. Chicago is…that’s also the difference.
    Feb. 12 at 7:32 p.m.
    #12
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2022
    Posts: 514
    Likes: 328
    Quoting: Hockeyfan1234
    RyJo is a 4 million cap hit for the next season and a half, the guy just drafted in the 1st rd was drafted 31st and has a lot less value than a player picked 15th, much less a top 10 pick. Also, the pens have MP, Graves, POJ, Smith, Pickering, Rathbone, Ludvig that are all either young and/or signed long term on the left side. A LD prospect is probably the LAST thing the pens need.
    So to answer your question…not whatever it is you and the ACGM creator are smoking.

    We are already over half way through the season and the deadline leaves about a quarter left and comparable cap dumps was a 2nd rounder for a more expensive AAV and buyout cost. The comparable mentioned on 32 thoughts today was the giroux deal and when it happened Tippet was entering bust territory it’s not like they traded him in the middle of a 60 point season. The Avs deal was a 1st and Justin Barron 27th OA which was also on the table but giroux picked the panthers. People thought the panthers fleeced in that deal
    Feb. 12 at 7:33 p.m.
    #13
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 15,580
    Likes: 11,961
    Anaheim passes

    We get a 2024 1st for Rico
    Feb. 12 at 7:43 p.m.
    #14
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2022
    Posts: 1,638
    Likes: 550
    Quoting: Altar7358
    We are already over half way through the season and the deadline leaves about a quarter left and comparable cap dumps was a 2nd rounder for a more expensive AAV and buyout cost. The comparable mentioned on 32 thoughts today was the giroux deal and when it happened Tippet was entering bust territory it’s not like they traded him in the middle of a 60 point season. The Avs deal was a 1st and Justin Barron 27th OA which was also on the table but giroux picked the panthers. People thought the panthers fleeced in that deal


    No your comparable buyout victim only had a worse buyout hit in the 1st year, not the 2nd. And again the pens aren’t in any position to take on buyout candidates for picks so it would cost more…much more for a team like the pens to take on a buyout candidate/cap dump.
    Secondly Giroux got traded for a 1st, 3rd, and ok prospect. Giroux was older and had a full NMC which took a hit to his value. So naturally a younger Guentzel that has minimal trade protection has more value as it leads to more contenders and creates a bidding war. Guentzel is also currently MUCH better now than Giroux was at the time of his trade which adds even more value to Guentzel. Third, the pens aren’t exactly out of it and the flyers were starting their rebuild, so naturally it makes sense that adds value to pry Guentzel.
    So the Giroux deal is where convos start, but it’s going to take a good bit more to win any possible Guentzel sweepstakes.
    Feb. 12 at 7:45 p.m.
    #15
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2022
    Posts: 514
    Likes: 328
    Quoting: GeneralLandro
    Anaheim passes

    We get a 2024 1st for Rico

    Why would it matter? 2024 draft is supposed to be pretty weak after pick 20 from everything I’ve seen
    Feb. 12 at 7:54 p.m.
    #16
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 15,580
    Likes: 11,961
    Quoting: Altar7358
    Why would it matter? 2024 draft is supposed to be pretty weak after pick 20 from everything I’ve seen


    Because I have a few guys I’d want in the later end of the 1st round
    Feb. 12 at 8:01 p.m.
    #17
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2022
    Posts: 514
    Likes: 328
    Quoting: Hockeyfan1234
    No your comparable buyout victim only had a worse buyout hit in the 1st year, not the 2nd. And again the pens aren’t in any position to take on buyout candidates for picks so it would cost more…much more for a team like the pens to take on a buyout candidate/cap dump.
    Secondly Giroux got traded for a 1st, 3rd, and ok prospect. Giroux was older and had a full NMC which took a hit to his value. So naturally a younger Guentzel that has minimal trade protection has more value as it leads to more contenders and creates a bidding war. Guentzel is also currently MUCH better now than Giroux was at the time of his trade which adds even more value to Guentzel. Third, the pens aren’t exactly out of it and the flyers were starting their rebuild, so naturally it makes sense that adds value to pry Guentzel.
    So the Giroux deal is where convos start, but it’s going to take a good bit more to win any possible Guentzel sweepstakes.

    Bailey overall costs 1.1 million more to buyout in total over RyJo 1.3 million more than RyJo the first year and 200k less the second year. To address your value of guentzel point just last year Horvat having a better year as a 2 way center went for a 1st a recent second rounder and a 3rd. That first was in the late teen range which is at least 10 spots higher but centers are more valuable than wings always. I could be sold to change that 3rd to a 2nd but adding another first and prospect is ridiculous for 20 games and a playoff run. Retention for 20 games also doesn’t cost very much. Leafs paid the Wild a 4th rounder to retain close to 2 million on ROR last season.
    Feb. 12 at 8:36 p.m.
    #18
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2022
    Posts: 1,638
    Likes: 550
    Quoting: Altar7358
    Bailey overall costs 1.1 million more to buyout in total over RyJo 1.3 million more than RyJo the first year and 200k less the second year. To address your value of guentzel point just last year Horvat having a better year as a 2 way center went for a 1st a recent second rounder and a 3rd. That first was in the late teen range which is at least 10 spots higher but centers are more valuable than wings always. I could be sold to change that 3rd to a 2nd but adding another first and prospect is ridiculous for 20 games and a playoff run. Retention for 20 games also doesn’t cost very much. Leafs paid the Wild a 4th rounder to retain close to 2 million on ROR last season.


    Who cares what teams paid for players last year? If you want a real basis then let’s look at this year, because it’s the market for this year, not last year or the 21-22 season. Elias Lindholm got a 1st, 2 3rd round pick prospects, a conditional 4th that can become a 3rd, and a middle 6 winger. Sean Monahan got a 1st and conditional 3rd. Jake Guentzel is far better than Monahan and is better than Lindholm this year. So yes it’s already gonna be more than Lindholm and the fact that you’re adding retention on Guentzel, adding a cap dump coming back, and subtracting a solid middle 6 player…my assessment is absolutely very fair.
    Feb. 12 at 8:39 p.m.
    #19
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 9,617
    Likes: 4,591
    Avs decline all around. Poor asset management.
    Feb. 12 at 8:45 p.m.
    #20
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2022
    Posts: 514
    Likes: 328
    Quoting: Hockeyfan1234
    Who cares what teams paid for players last year? If you want a real basis then let’s look at this year, because it’s the market for this year, not last year or the 21-22 season. Elias Lindholm got a 1st, 2 3rd round pick prospects, a conditional 4th that can become a 3rd, and a middle 6 winger. Sean Monahan got a 1st and conditional 3rd. Jake Guentzel is far better than Monahan and is better than Lindholm this year. So yes it’s already gonna be more than Lindholm and the fact that you’re adding retention on Guentzel, adding a cap dump coming back, and subtracting a solid middle 6 player…my assessment is absolutely very fair.

    Lindholm value was based off reputation 3 firsts for just about any rental especially a winger is ridiculous and if that’s what you expect you’ll be disappointed. Even 2 actual frps isn’t gonna happen. The deal I put up is more than what Lindholm and Monahan got by a large margin as well. 2 firsts and a 3rd is a lot more than they got
    Feb. 12 at 9:22 p.m.
    #21
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2022
    Posts: 514
    Likes: 328
    Quoting: TJTwolf
    Avs decline all around. Poor asset management.

    I don’t think they do these trades specifically but giving up these types of assets shouldn’t be out of the question I think. Only guy I wouldn’t trade is Ritchie. I’m still holding out hope we can pry Frost out of Philly
    Feb. 12 at 9:30 p.m.
    #22
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2022
    Posts: 1,638
    Likes: 550
    Quoting: Altar7358
    Lindholm value was based off reputation 3 firsts for just about any rental especially a winger is ridiculous and if that’s what you expect you’ll be disappointed. Even 2 actual frps isn’t gonna happen. The deal I put up is more than what Lindholm and Monahan got by a large margin as well. 2 firsts and a 3rd is a lot more than they got


    No it isn’t more because you added a cap dump coming back and added the other team retaining on the player. Not to mention the “1st round prospect” plays a position the pens don’t need a prospect for. So that prospect may be higher value to other teams than the pens.
    Feb. 12 at 9:42 p.m.
    #23
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 9,617
    Likes: 4,591
    Quoting: Altar7358
    I don’t think they do these trades specifically but giving up these types of assets shouldn’t be out of the question I think. Only guy I wouldn’t trade is Ritchie. I’m still holding out hope we can pry Frost out of Philly


    It's the usual faux pas that GMs make at the TDL to my mind but each to their own. I do agree somewhat on Frost but would prefer Novak. Question on Novak would be what it would cost to re-sign him.
    Feb. 12 at 10:48 p.m.
    #24
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2020
    Posts: 11,483
    Likes: 9,112
    Quoting: Hockeyfan1234
    RyJo is a 4 million cap hit for the next season and a half, the guy just drafted in the 1st rd was drafted 31st and has a lot less value than a player picked 15th, much less a top 10 pick. Also, the pens have MP, Graves, POJ, Smith, Pickering, Rathbone, Ludvig that are all either young and/or signed long term on the left side. A LD prospect is probably the LAST thing the pens need.
    So to answer your question…not whatever it is you and the ACGM creator are smoking.


    Bro do you know how the cap works? He doesn’t have a $4M cap hit now because salaries are pro-rated, his cap hit the remaining year is like $1.4M. At worst asking some to take $5.4M is a single first.
    Feb. 12 at 11:42 p.m.
    #25
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2022
    Posts: 1,638
    Likes: 550
    Quoting: Xqb15a
    Bro do you know how the cap works? He doesn’t have a $4M cap hit now because salaries are pro-rated, his cap hit the remaining year is like $1.4M. At worst asking some to take $5.4M is a single first.


    His cap hit is 4 million and the pens currently only have 175k cap space with a 21 man roster . You can try to mental gymnastics your way around it but in real life here on planet earth his cap hit is 4 million next season. He is still a cap dump whether he is traded today, tomorrow, the trade deadline, the offseason, the 13th day of next season…he’s still a cap dump. A cap dump that teams aren’t going to want unless you pay a pretty penny or retain a decent bit on. If the Avs can find another team to take him on for just a 1st or just a 2nd. Great…go for it and do it then y’all can trade for Guentzel and not have to pay the pens a cap dump premium on top of the Guentzel asking price. See how that works…it’s magically solved.
    Then it’s just the original asking price of a 1st, a 3rd, and a top prospect.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll