SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Desperation

Created by: BubbleGumPlant
Team: 2023-24 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 12, 2024
Published: Feb. 12, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
TOR
  1. Pezzetta, Michael
  2. Savard, David
  3. Xhekaj, Arber
  4. Xhekaj, Florian [Reserve List]
  5. 2025 2nd round pick (PIT)
  6. 2025 3rd round pick (VAN)
MTL
  1. Brodie, TJ
  2. Cowan, Easton
  3. Knies, Matthew
  4. 2024 1st round pick (TOR)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
2025
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2026
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$81,905,616$0$0$1,594,384
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$796,667$796,667
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$762,500$762,500
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$812,500$812,500
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$7,500,000$7,500,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,400,000$1,400,000
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$875,000$875,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$828,333$828,333
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,100,000$1,100,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,550,000$3,550,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,400,000$2,400,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,150,000$4,150,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,687,500$4,687,500
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$766,667$766,667
G
RFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 12 at 9:24 p.m.
#1
Mr.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 3,804
Likes: 1,263
Sorry bud, Xhekaj isn't available
Feb. 12 at 9:25 p.m.
#2
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,621
Likes: 25,468
Three of your top 6 future assets for a collection of fillers?

Poor strategy, if you ask me.
SirRobo, CoryTheGreat and HShockey liked this.
Feb. 12 at 9:28 p.m.
#3
SirRobo
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 567
Likes: 134
That’s way too many left D. Highly recommend definitely trying some on the right side.
Feb. 12 at 9:28 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 500
Likes: 433
If this is prepping to goon it up to scare the Sens next season, just know that it won't work. Ottawa hasn't lost to the Habs in like 2 years
Feb. 12 at 9:28 p.m.
#5
SirRobo
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 567
Likes: 134
Quoting: SMH
Sorry bud, Xhekaj isn't available


Lmaoo you wishhh
HShockey and We_know_nothing liked this.
Feb. 12 at 9:38 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 437
Quoting: SMH
Sorry bud, Xhekaj isn't available


Quoting: SMH
Sorry bud, Xhekaj isn't available


LMFAO. For Knie, Cowan and a 1st Xhekaj isn’t available? This is the most ridiculous deal I’ve seen in a while and some Habs fans are rejecting this deal
OldNYIfan liked this.
Feb. 12 at 10:09 p.m.
#7
Prime Primeau
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 5,491
Likes: 2,181
Savard for a first, A Xhekaj for Cowan. Ain’t no way F Xhekaj, Pezzetta and 2 picks get Knies.

My proposal to make this deal fair. Remove Knies and the picks from Mtl and add a fourth from Toronto
Feb. 12 at 10:16 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 437
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
Savard for a first, A Xhekaj for Cowan. Ain’t no way F Xhekaj, Pezzetta and 2 picks get Knies.

My proposal to make this deal fair. Remove Knies and the picks from Mtl and add a fourth from Toronto


We aren't dealing Cowan + a 1st for Pezzetta, both Xhekaj, and a 33-year old Savard. We really don't need Xhexaj with Benoit, Savard would be a decent addition but with the 1st there are better players to target (Tanev, Ferraro, Walker, Larsson)
Feb. 12 at 10:28 p.m.
#9
Go Canucks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2024
Posts: 75
Likes: 24
Quoting: SMH
Sorry bud, Xhekaj isn't available


This is a legit question, because I truly don't understand. What is with Montreal fans' obsession of Xhekaj? I've seen him play about half dozen times, and other than being a beast, I don't see anything special there. He's a projected third pairing defensemen who is tough. Do people think he's going to develop the same way that Dustin Byfuglien did? What am I missing?
Feb. 12 at 10:46 p.m.
#10
Former NHL Executive
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2023
Posts: 704
Likes: 157
Quoting: HShockey
We aren't dealing Cowan + a 1st for Pezzetta, both Xhekaj, and a 33-year old Savard. We really don't need Xhexaj with Benoit, Savard would be a decent addition but with the 1st there are better players to target (Tanev, Ferraro, Walker, Larsson)


You are a Toronto and Vancouver fan.

You don't understand loyalty or what it's like to be a fan. You are hated by everyone. Just give up.
Feb. 13 at 8:39 a.m.
#11
Fall River Habs
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 887
Likes: 336
Quoting: We_know_nothing
This is a legit question, because I truly don't understand. What is with Montreal fans' obsession of Xhekaj? I've seen him play about half dozen times, and other than being a beast, I don't see anything special there. He's a projected third pairing defensemen who is tough. Do people think he's going to develop the same way that Dustin Byfuglien did? What am I missing?


Personally, I think that Xhekaj is coveted by us Habs fans because he brings an element of toughness that Montreal really needs (and cannot easily replace), plus he can play decently well for an enforcer (skates pretty well for his size, has a good shot and a bit of offensive talent-- not a Norris candidate by any means). I would not say that he is untouchable or that he will develop into a Byfuglien type (but who knows, sometimes those guys come out of left field and have very good careers), but a trade would have to involve a fairly good piece coming back to Montreal.

I think the value he adds to a playoff team is that his type of game is very well suited for the playoffs (although he does take bad penalties at times).

I find it hard to believe that another team would offer up what Kent Hughes may want for him, because of his value to the Habs, but I imagine there is a package of players out there that would work if Montreal wanted to do so,
Feb. 13 at 1:51 p.m.
#12
Go Habs Go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 101
Likes: 29
Quoting: We_know_nothing
This is a legit question, because I truly don't understand. What is with Montreal fans' obsession of Xhekaj? I've seen him play about half dozen times, and other than being a beast, I don't see anything special there. He's a projected third pairing defensemen who is tough. Do people think he's going to develop the same way that Dustin Byfuglien did? What am I missing?


To answer your legit question, as noted, he provides the toughness and beastliness that's been missing. That said, it looks like his confidence has dropped a bit this year, but he still is good at getting shots through and transitioning the puck well, via breakouts or neutral zone transitions. He definitely lacks speed and his positioning needs some work as I feel he chases the play too much and seems to focus too much on where he is now vs where he should be next, which allows for plays against him to unfold. I love him as I think there's room to grow, but with the possible talent in the pipeline, he needs to REALLY improve these downfalls. I think what you'll find with us fans is that it's exciting to have that grit on the team. It's a part of hockey that many enjoy and the next toughest guys are Pezzetta and Anderson.
Feb. 13 at 10:38 p.m.
#13
Go Canucks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2024
Posts: 75
Likes: 24
Quoting: KentMcNally
Personally, I think that Xhekaj is coveted by us Habs fans because he brings an element of toughness that Montreal really needs (and cannot easily replace), plus he can play decently well for an enforcer (skates pretty well for his size, has a good shot and a bit of offensive talent-- not a Norris candidate by any means). I would not say that he is untouchable or that he will develop into a Byfuglien type (but who knows, sometimes those guys come out of left field and have very good careers), but a trade would have to involve a fairly good piece coming back to Montreal.

I think the value he adds to a playoff team is that his type of game is very well suited for the playoffs (although he does take bad penalties at times).

I find it hard to believe that another team would offer up what Kent Hughes may want for him, because of his value to the Habs, but I imagine there is a package of players out there that would work if Montreal wanted to do so,


Quoting: Samsquanch14
To answer your legit question, as noted, he provides the toughness and beastliness that's been missing. That said, it looks like his confidence has dropped a bit this year, but he still is good at getting shots through and transitioning the puck well, via breakouts or neutral zone transitions. He definitely lacks speed and his positioning needs some work as I feel he chases the play too much and seems to focus too much on where he is now vs where he should be next, which allows for plays against him to unfold. I love him as I think there's room to grow, but with the possible talent in the pipeline, he needs to REALLY improve these downfalls. I think what you'll find with us fans is that it's exciting to have that grit on the team. It's a part of hockey that many enjoy and the next toughest guys are Pezzetta and Anderson.


Thanks for the responses here guys, although that leave me with a couple follow up questions (remember, these are legit questions, I'm not trolling):
1. There are a lot of skilled tough guy, and even more who lack high end skills but are tough. When I've seen Xhekaj, he is...at best...neutral on the ice, but quite often a liability. I just feel that there are so many more talented/tough options out there.
2. The game has changed. It has wholly changed. Tough guys (goons) aren't appreciated anymore. To quote that talentless bag of cement - Ryan Reaves "Make hockey violent again" isn't reality. The kids are coming in an skating circles around the pylons. Xhekaj is an alright skater, but there are definitely upgrades out there.

What has prompted this line of questioning was the offer made here by a Leafs fan to trade one legit prospect, one legit young roster player and a 1st round pick for a bunch of stuff, but Xhekaj (damn that's hard to type) as the main player coming back. I personally think that's an absolute DUMB amount to pay for him, but I saw Habs fans saying no to an offer they obviously should say yes to and it's not even close.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll