SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trade Deadline

Created by: Finski
Team: 2023-24 New York Rangers
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 19, 2024
Published: Feb. 20, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
NYR
  1. Laughton, Scott ($1,500,000 retained)
PHI
  1. Henricks, Ty [Reserve List]
  2. 2024 2nd round pick (NYR)
2.
NYR
  1. Eberle, Jordan ($2,750,000 retained)
  2. 2024 3rd round pick (SEA)
SEA
  1. Robertson, Matthew
  2. 2025 1st round pick (NYR)
  3. 2026 6th round pick (NYR)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
2025
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
2026
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$82,679,083$610,892$582,500$820,917

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the New York Rangers
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Rangers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$11,642,857$11,642,857
LW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,325,000$2,325,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$828,333$828,333 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$762,500$762,500
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,641,667$3,641,667
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Rangers
$800,000$800,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the New York Rangers
$5,666,667$5,666,667
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,872,000$3,872,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$8,000,000$8,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$825,000$825,000 (Performance Bonus$100,000$100K)
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$825,000$825,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the New York Rangers
$820,000$820,000
C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$4,437,500$4,437,500
C, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Rangers
$846,667$846,667
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$800,000$800,000 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
RW
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$812,500$812,500
LD
RFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 20 at 3:45 p.m.
#1
"Go sell ice cream!"
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,055
Likes: 1,378
Doubt Briere wants Hendricks. Add substantially more as Laughton isn't a rental so that retention will cost quite a bit.
Feb. 20 at 3:47 p.m.
#2
GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 800
Likes: 324
Overpay on both. Having both Laughton and Goodrow is a recipe for disaster. Neither are good players and have negative impacts on the ice. Those problems will compound if they are on the same line.
Feb. 20 at 3:48 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
New York Rangers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 1,789
Likes: 522
Quoting: jfkst1
Doubt Briere wants Hendricks. Add substantially more as Laughton isn't a rental so that retention will cost quite a bit.


What would you add?
Feb. 20 at 3:50 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
New York Rangers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 1,789
Likes: 522
Quoting: GM69
Overpay on both. Having both Laughton and Goodrow is a recipe for disaster. Neither are good players and have negative impacts on the ice. Those problems will compound if they are on the same line.


Goody is a solid defensive choice, from what I have seen so is Laughton... I feel that Eberle will go for that price... the 1st in next years draft will be a late one. A 6th is a 6th... I feel we might as well trade Robertson since he will not play for NY so in the interest of his career we should trade him...
Feb. 20 at 3:59 p.m.
#5
"Go sell ice cream!"
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,055
Likes: 1,378
Quoting: Finski
What would you add?


Given NYR are division rivals, not sure Briere would even consider the deal in the first place. If he did, I'd ask for Perreault for Laughton with that retention is worth the risk and compare it to other offers. I can understand that being too much for Drury so at minimum the 2026 1st and 3rd with the 2024 2nd. Like I said, Briere might not even consider an in division rival unless substantial overpayment.
Feb. 20 at 4:01 p.m.
#6
GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 800
Likes: 324
Quoting: Finski
Goody is a solid defensive choice, from what I have seen so is Laughton... I feel that Eberle will go for that price... the 1st in next years draft will be a late one. A 6th is a 6th... I feel we might as well trade Robertson since he will not play for NY so in the interest of his career we should trade him...


Laughton's analytics from 2022-23 (78GP) vs 2022-2024 (132 GP)

WAR:
2022-2023: 58%
2022-2024: 17%
Difference with this years games included: minus 41%

EV Defence:
2022-23: 30%
2022-2024: 15%
Difference with this years games included: minus 15%

EV Offense:
2022-2023: 80%
2022-2024: 65%
Difference with this years games included: minus 15%

Penalties
2022-2023: 27%
2022-2024: 17%
Difference with this years games included: minus 10%

Finishing
2022-2023: 74%
2022-2024: 51%
Difference with this years games included: minus 23%


The only stat he stayed consistent with was the PK which he was only 5%... NYR do NOT need to pay a premium to obtain an underperforming player. He is literally another Goodrow at his current rate (although the retention in the trade helps). Having Goodrow already, NYR should not spend assets to obtain a second one.
Finski and busters99 liked this.
Feb. 20 at 4:03 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
New York Rangers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 1,789
Likes: 522
Quoting: jfkst1
Given NYR are division rivals, not sure Briere would even consider the deal in the first place. If he did, I'd ask for Perreault for Laughton with that retention is worth the risk and compare it to other offers. I can understand that being too much for Drury so at minimum the 2026 1st and 3rd with the 2024 2nd. Like I said, Briere might not even consider an in division rival unless substantial overpayment.


You must be out of your mind asking for Perreault for Laughton... would be if we would ask for your top prospect for Goodrow at 50% retention...
Fox_Czar_Cup and GM69 liked this.
Feb. 20 at 4:03 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,731
Likes: 1,559
Your Laughton price is what you should pay for Eberle and you shouldn't target Laughton period.
Finski and Fox_Czar_Cup liked this.
Feb. 20 at 4:16 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 728
Eberle is not worth a 1st and our best D-prospect. I really think just a 1st would do for him.

The Laughton trade doesn't make sense for either team. I just don't envision PHI selling
Feb. 20 at 4:33 p.m.
#10
"Go sell ice cream!"
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,055
Likes: 1,378
Quoting: Finski
You must be out of your mind asking for Perreault for Laughton... would be if we would ask for your top prospect for Goodrow at 50% retention...


When you ignore context that I explicitly prefaced this with, then I can see why you think that way. I already said Briere might demand an overpayment to make the deal with Drury, emphasis on OVERpayment. I personally think Laughton is a waste to target and largely overpaid for his contributions, but NHL GMs like Drury often make erroneous decisions.
Feb. 20 at 10:03 p.m.
#11
B
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 8,024
Likes: 1,461
Quoting: GM69
Overpay on both. Having both Laughton and Goodrow is a recipe for disaster. Neither are good players and have negative impacts on the ice. Those problems will compound if they are on the same line.


Goodrow is good
Feb. 21 at 10:54 a.m.
#12
GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 800
Likes: 324
Quoting: Fox_Czar_Cup
Goodrow is good


look I'm a NYR fan and even I say he's been horrible this year. He's dropped off the face of the earth from the prior two years.
Feb. 21 at 10:59 a.m.
#13
GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 800
Likes: 324
Quoting: jfkst1
When you ignore context that I explicitly prefaced this with, then I can see why you think that way. I already said Briere might demand an overpayment to make the deal with Drury, emphasis on OVERpayment. I personally think Laughton is a waste to target and largely overpaid for his contributions, but NHL GMs like Drury often make erroneous decisions.


an overpayment would be Zac Jones... you went full crazy by asking for Perreault. Imagine if Philadelphia wanted Goodrow @50% and NYR said they wanted Gauthier (before he was traded to Anaheim). That's essentially what your suggestion was.
Feb. 21 at 11:15 a.m.
#14
"Go sell ice cream!"
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,055
Likes: 1,378
Quoting: GM69
an overpayment would be Zac Jones... you went full crazy by asking for Perreault. Imagine if Philadelphia wanted Goodrow 50% and NYR said they wanted Gauthier (before he was traded to Anaheim). That's essentially what your suggestion was.


1. Zac Jones carries little value as he is 23 and not excelling in the NHL. Every team has a Zac Jones and few of them develop into anything worthwhile.
2. Goodrow is a liability. While I am not a huge fan of Laughton, his perceived value is much higher.
3. Gauthier was a much more valuable prospect than Perreault has been. Generally, prospect rankings from shortly before the trade had Gauthier well ahead of Perreault by a good 15-25 spots. So yet again, your valuations are wildly inaccurate.
Feb. 21 at 1:32 p.m.
#15
GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 800
Likes: 324
Quoting: jfkst1
1. Zac Jones carries little value as he is 23 and not excelling in the NHL. Every team has a Zac Jones and few of them develop into anything worthwhile.
2. Goodrow is a liability. While I am not a huge fan of Laughton, his perceived value is much higher.
3. Gauthier was a much more valuable prospect than Perreault has been. Generally, prospect rankings from shortly before the trade had Gauthier well ahead of Perreault by a good 15-25 spots. So yet again, your valuations are wildly inaccurate.


1) He's blocked in the NHL by Lindgren, Miller & Gus
2) Both players are liabilities and are both overpaid. Kindof a wash here.
3) Yes Gauthier has the higher pedigree right now, but he's also a year older and Perreault is outperforming him this year. Gauthier as a freshman had 37 points in 32 games, Perreault has 48 points in 29 games. Perreault is rising VERY fast
Feb. 21 at 3:21 p.m.
#16
B
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 8,024
Likes: 1,461
Quoting: GM69
look I'm a NYR fan and even I say he's been horrible this year. He's dropped off the face of the earth from the prior two years.


That's the tmz narrative, even our own fanbase are stat watching now lol. All I see is him shutting people down with aggressive forcheck & backcheck with him & Trouba leading the physical way. He's gold with Vesey. Now Vesey is up and he's still going & leading our 2 giant newbie kids with him.
His cap may have to go next year but he will leave a big hole.
Feb. 22 at 12:20 p.m.
#17
GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 800
Likes: 324
Quoting: jfkst1
1. Zac Jones carries little value as he is 23 and not excelling in the NHL. Every team has a Zac Jones and few of them develop into anything worthwhile.
2. Goodrow is a liability. While I am not a huge fan of Laughton, his perceived value is much higher.
3. Gauthier was a much more valuable prospect than Perreault has been. Generally, prospect rankings from shortly before the trade had Gauthier well ahead of Perreault by a good 15-25 spots. So yet again, your valuations are wildly inaccurate.


Just to expand on Perreault now, Button just released his top 50 nhl affiliated prospects and Perreault was in the same rank as Gauthier (AA) with Gauthier being ranked 1st and Perreault 7th. My "wildly inaccurate" valuations aren't so wild.
busters99 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll