SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

5 acceptable ways in which the Stars can pay for Tarasenko

Created by: sensonfire
Team: 2023-24 Ottawa Senators
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 21, 2024
Published: Feb. 21, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
OTT
  1. 2024 1st round pick (DAL)
Additional Details:
1. 2024 1st round pick

2. 2025 1st round pick

3. 2024 2nd round pick + 2026 2nd round pick

4. Mavrik Bourque + 2025 3rd round pick

5. Logan Stankoven + 2025 3rd round pick
DAL
  1. Tarasenko, Vladimir ($2,500,000 retained)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the DET
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
2025
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
2026
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$83,330,713$0$1,850,000$169,287
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$8,205,714$8,205,714
LW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$8,350,000$8,350,000
C
UFA - 8
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$2,950,000$2,950,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$7,950,000$7,950,000
C
UFA - 7
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$4,975,000$4,975,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$863,333$863,333
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$775,000$775,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$762,500$762,500
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$835,000$835,000
C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$775,000$775,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$1,850,000$2M)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$4,600,000$4,600,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$8,000,000$8,000,000
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$4,600,000$4,600,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$4,000,000$4,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$805,000$805,000
RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$1,100,000$1,100,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$813,333$813,333
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$775,000$775,000
C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 21 at 1:39 p.m.
#1
Darkblade
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 777
Likes: 390
i doubt u get one of the prospects without you adding lmao
Feb. 21 at 1:47 p.m.
#2
Sam
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,240
Likes: 2,188
Tarasenko getting a first sounds wild to me, but I also said that last year so who knows.
Feb. 21 at 2:02 p.m.
#3
... We're a "Team"..
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 2,434
Likes: 1,144
Quoting: STLBlues17
Tarasenko getting a first sounds wild to me, but I also said that last year so who knows.


Similar numbers to last year if not slightly better on an arguably worse team team. Good defensive numbers considering where he is in the lineup. I could absolutely see a team give a late first for him (DAL or VGK). Ottawa is also willing to retain 50% as well. Considering what Monohan got, a return worse than that would be a bad start to Staios' tenure. The hinderance is the NTC as it will limit the options and handcuff Staios.
sensonfire liked this.
Feb. 21 at 2:33 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 10,504
Likes: 3,721
Doubt you'd get Stankoven or Bourque this way but yes, Tarasenko is returning a 1st
sensonfire and Green4D4 liked this.
Feb. 21 at 2:48 p.m.
#5
True Reverse Retro
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 4,624
Likes: 3,037
Where did this whole Tarasenko to Dallas thing even come from? Dallas is currently the highest scoring team in the league and have pretty massive holes in their defense that need to be addressed before they even look at adding a forward that they don't need. Why would they spend any assets for Tarasenko instead of going after someone like Tanev or Hanifin?

Also, Bourque and Stankoven are off the table here.
Green4D4 liked this.
Feb. 21 at 2:51 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
sensonfire
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 11,816
Likes: 4,451
Quoting: TheMooterus
Where did this whole Tarasenko to Dallas thing even come from? Dallas is currently the highest scoring team in the league and have pretty massive holes in their defense that need to be addressed before they even look at adding a forward that they don't need. Why would they spend any assets for Tarasenko instead of going after someone like Tanev or Hanifin?

Also, Bourque and Stankoven are off the table here.


1. Dadonov is out long-term.

2. Because Tanev and Hanifin might cost more.
Green4D4 liked this.
Feb. 21 at 3:03 p.m.
#7
True Reverse Retro
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 4,624
Likes: 3,037
Quoting: sensonfire
1. Dadonov is out long-term.

2. Because Tanev and Hanifin might cost more.


If it were Duchene, or Robertson, or Johnston, etc. then I'd be more inclined to try and add a forward. I like Dadonov, but he was not a major offensive contributor in Dallas' top-9. Shoot, Sam Steel is almost producing at the same rate as Dadonov. It just doesn't seem worth it for Dallas to use a 1st Round Pick (or equal value) to replace a 3rd line forward when they can either slot in someone like Steel to that role or simply just use Stankoven/Bourque to fill that role.

Tanev should not cost MORE than Tarasenko either. Hanifin, very likely would (and should), but it would also be more worth it for Dallas in the long run. Shoot, if I'm making a deal with Ottawa, Chychrun is probably at the top of my list, given my needs. If I'm Dallas and I'm okay moving some of the assets you have listed here then I'm not going for a middle-6 winger. I want a true top-4 defenseman like Chychrun.
sensonfire and Green4D4 liked this.
Feb. 21 at 3:11 p.m.
#8
TkachukNorris79
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 377
If Dallas is looking at Ottawa it's probably Chychrun, not Vladdy. And Chychrun is the only way they'd be able to land one of Stankoven/Bourque. If they're moving him, I'd rather them go for one of them who can contribute soon than a late 1st who needs 3+ years to develop
sensonfire, TheMooterus and Xspyrit liked this.
Feb. 21 at 6:24 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 10,504
Likes: 3,721
Quoting: TheMooterus
Shoot, if I'm making a deal with Ottawa, Chychrun is probably at the top of my list, given my needs. If I'm Dallas and I'm okay moving some of the assets you have listed here then I'm not going for a middle-6 winger. I want a true top-4 defenseman like Chychrun.

Yeah I have thought this before, Chychrun might make sense for Dallas. He was never really the right target for Ottawa. They need a physical RHD and 2-way wingers to replace Tarasenko and Kubalik

What can you propose?
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll