SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Flames Deadline Blowup

Created by: tdawg1928
Team: 2023-24 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 22, 2024
Published: Feb. 22, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
CGY
  1. Sawchyn, Gracyn [Reserve List]
  2. 2025 3rd round pick (FLA)
  3. 2026 1st round pick (FLA)
2.
3.
CGY
  1. Faksa, Radek
  2. 2025 1st round pick (DAL)
Additional Details:
Reliant on Faksa waiving NMC
4.
CGY
  1. Byram, Bowen
  2. Johansen, Ryan
  3. 2024 1st round pick (COL)
  4. 2025 4th round pick (COL)
5.
CGY
  1. Barlow, Colby
  2. Brown, Garrett [Reserve List]
  3. Namestnikov, Vladislav
  4. 2025 1st round pick (WPG)
6.
CGY
  1. Kakko, Kaapo
  2. 2024 2nd round pick (NYR)
NYR
  1. 2024 1st round pick (COL)
7.
CGY
  1. Bortuzzo, Robert
  2. Kuefler, Daylan
  3. 2025 2nd round pick (NYI)
Additional Details:
Lou overpays for a little grit
8.
CGY
  1. Pettersson, Oskar
  2. 2024 4th round pick (TBL)
  3. 2025 2nd round pick (OTT)
  4. 2026 3rd round pick (OTT)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CGY
2025
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the COL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2026
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,500,000$64,346,666$0$1,077,500$19,153,334
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$10,500,000$10,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,100,000$3,100,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,000,000$4,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$3,250,000$3,250,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$775,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,300,000$1,300,000
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$813,333$813,333 (Performance Bonus$15,000$15K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,850,000$3,850,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$950,000$950,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$775,000
RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW, C
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 22 at 5:40 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 489
Likes: 530
You Calgary fans are smoking the good stuff if you think you can get Byram for anything on your current roster.

Coleman is great but the Avs need a 2C and a 4C. The Avs would move Byram for a young cost controlled 2C, which you don't have. And Vladar sucks. IMO, the Avs would be better off rolling with Prosvetov than giving up any kind of asset for Vladar.
TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 22 at 5:43 p.m.
#2
Donald
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 309
Likes: 238
Quoting: Android_H_Jones
You Calgary fans are smoking the good stuff if you think you can get Byram for anything on your current roster.

Coleman is great but the Avs need a 2C and a 4C. The Avs would move Byram for a young cost controlled 2C, which you don't have. And Vladar sucks. IMO, the Avs would be better off rolling with Prosvetov than giving up any kind of asset for Vladar.


this guy does not speak for the sane flames faithful.
Android_H_Jones and TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 22 at 5:44 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 521
The first 3 trades started off ok, everything after that is unrealistic.
Feb. 22 at 5:45 p.m.
#4
Bandwagon fairweathe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,706
Likes: 3,297
No thanks from Winnipeg, possibly tanev or andersson, don’t have the cap or the gambling ability for kadri term. Could use a top 4 rhd dman to slot everyone down a little, or add a little offense up front, but both have to come with limited cap or term.
Feb. 22 at 5:47 p.m.
#5
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 12,452
Likes: 3,318
Quoting: Shaun80
The first 3 trades started off ok, everything after that is unrealistic.


It got bad at holtz+1st for an unretained markstrom
Feb. 22 at 5:48 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 521
Quoting: dgibb10
It got bad at holtz+1st for an unretained markstrom


Fair enough, just proposed the same trade myself, but with 2 million retained on Markstrom so it looked fine to me at first glance.
Feb. 22 at 5:51 p.m.
#7
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 12,452
Likes: 3,318
Quoting: Shaun80
Fair enough, just proposed the same trade myself, but with 2 million retained on Markstrom so it looked fine to me at first glance.


4 million in retention full year+2 mill in deadline retention is close to a whole 1st round pick in value on its own

Big big difference. It’d be like if I took your trade for example and then just added a 50% retained Tanev to it and said it was basically the same
Feb. 22 at 5:51 p.m.
#8
Lets go fishing
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 407
Likes: 214
Jets would rather have Vladdy this year and next + Barlow from 25-26 onward. They also don't have the cap space for Kadri's contract next year, and have already picked up their 2c rental in Monahan.

Colorado needs a 2c though, they might bite on bringing Kadri back.
Windjammer liked this.
Feb. 22 at 5:51 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 40
Likes: 9
😂😂 the Kadri trade. You're stuck with that contract enjoy.
RationalHockeyFan liked this.
Feb. 22 at 6:06 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 521
Quoting: dgibb10
4 million in retention full year+2 mill in deadline retention is close to a whole 1st round pick in value on its own

Big big difference. It’d be like if I took your trade for example and then just added a 50% retained Tanev to it and said it was basically the same


Holtz for Markstrom 1 for 1 is probably an overpay for Jersey. You add Vanecek and I feel Jersey would have too add a little something. It's a tricky trade.
dgibb10 liked this.
Feb. 22 at 10:04 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 726
Likes: 326
Prefer to give up Sourdif over Sawchyn but that’s a solid framework to build a potential trade for Hanifin. Would be open to giving up another mid-rounder to have some cap retained.
Feb. 23 at 2:31 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,693
Likes: 4,617
Quoting: RationalHockeyFan
Jets would rather have Vladdy this year and next + Barlow from 25-26 onward. They also don't have the cap space for Kadri's contract next year, and have already picked up their 2c rental in Monahan.

Colorado needs a 2c though, they might bite on bringing Kadri back.


No, the Avs really wouldn't.
RationalHockeyFan liked this.
Feb. 23 at 2:31 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,693
Likes: 4,617
Easy no for the Avs.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll