SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sweeney type targets

Created by: hairyberry
Team: 2023-24 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 5, 2024
Published: Mar. 5, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Don often grabs a guy nobody was expecting, and often looks for players he can keep for multiple seasons. I think acquiring a player that is not only relevant now, but also will be a contributor in the future, is especially important this year.

Given the lack of draft capital and high end assets we can trade, imo he should be looking for another Zacha-type trade. Here are some under the radar players that I think could be involved in a hockey trade and may be of interest to us. Most of these guys could be acquired in “hockey deals”, in exchange for players who are also struggling for us (who could then be extended or re-flipped for future assets, depending on the acquiring team’s needs). All have cheap contracts and could be medium or even long term pieces. I don’t think any of them, except maybe Holtz, would cost an exorbitant amount either.
Trades
1.
LAK
    has a very high end shot but is getting no ice time. Has surprisingly good defensive metrics, but is mainly known for goal scoring and might be able to immediately step into a scoring role for the Bruins.
    2.
    NJD
      Probably the most expensive player in the list. High draft pick that can’t crack the top 6 on the RW New Jersey, as he is stuck behind Mercer/Bratt/Toffoli.
      3.
      SJS
        Having an awful season along with every other Shark but could feasibly perform much better on a good team.
        4.
        SJS
          Doesn’t have term but is young enough that you could sign him if he fits well. Would be very cheap as he has produced nothing this year, but scored 30g with the Panthers last season.
          5.
          BUF
            A Tuch trade just isn't happening. But Krebs on the other hand hasn’t seemed to find a scoring touch in Buffalo, but has skill and is stuck behind a lot of very talented young forwards.
            6.
            ANA
              young guy on a somewhat cheap deal, big and very fast. I think he’s pretty underrated and would make a good bottom 6 winger as a Bruin.
              Buyouts
              DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
              2024
              Logo of the BOS
              Logo of the BOS
              Logo of the BOS
              2025
              Logo of the BOS
              Logo of the BOS
              Logo of the BOS
              Logo of the BOS
              Logo of the BOS
              2026
              Logo of the BOS
              Logo of the BOS
              Logo of the BOS
              Logo of the BOS
              Logo of the BOS
              Logo of the BOS
              Logo of the BOS
              ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
              28$83,500,000$93,605,001$4,500,000$1,475,000-$10,105,001
              Left WingCentreRight Wing
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $6,125,000$6,125,000
              LW
              M-NTC
              UFA - 2
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $5,250,000$5,250,000
              C, RW
              M-NTC, NMC
              UFA - 3
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $11,250,000$11,250,000
              RW
              NMC
              UFA - 8
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $2,300,000$2,300,000
              LW, RW
              UFA - 2
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $4,750,000$4,750,000
              C, LW
              M-NTC
              UFA - 4
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $4,000,000$4,000,000
              RW, LW
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $1,000,000$1,000,000
              LW, RW
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $2,000,000$2,000,000
              C, RW
              RFA - 2
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $775,000$775,000
              RW
              UFA - 2
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $787,500$787,500
              LW, RW
              RFA - 2
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $775,000$775,000
              C
              RFA - 1
              Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
              $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
              RW, LW
              RFA - 1
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $775,000$775,000
              LW, RW
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $775,000$775,000
              C, LW
              RFA - 1
              Logo of the New Jersey Devils
              $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
              RW, LW
              RFA - 2
              Logo of the San Jose Sharks
              $3,000,000$3,000,000
              LW, RW
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
              $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$412,500$412K)
              C, LW
              RFA - 1
              Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
              $1,295,000$1,295,000
              LW, RW
              RFA - 1
              Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $3,687,500$3,687,500
              LD
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $9,500,000$9,500,000
              RD
              UFA - 7
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $5,000,000$5,000,000
              G
              M-NTC
              UFA - 2
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $3,000,000$3,000,000
              LD
              M-NTC
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $4,100,000$4,100,000
              RD
              M-NTC
              UFA - 4
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $3,475,000$3,475,000
              G
              RFA - 1
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $925,000$925,000
              LD
              RFA - 2
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $1,050,000$1,050,000
              RD
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $775,000$775,000
              LD
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the San Jose Sharks
              $3,250,000$3,250,000
              LD
              UFA - 3
              ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $6,500,000$6,500,000
              LD
              NTC, NMC
              UFA - 7
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $1,000,000$1,000,000 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
              LW, RW
              NMC
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $870,000$870,000 (Performance Bonus$80,000$80K)
              C
              RFA - 3

              Embed Code

              • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
              • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

              Text-Embed

              Click to Highlight
              Mar. 5 at 12:58 p.m.
              #1
              Best armchair GM yet
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jun. 2023
              Posts: 579
              Likes: 136
              I've been kicking tires on some of these
              hairyberry liked this.
              Mar. 5 at 1:00 p.m.
              #2
              Thread Starter
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Sep. 2020
              Posts: 452
              Likes: 211
              Quoting: dons_weeney
              I've been kicking tires on some of these


              Good to know Mr. Weeney thank you!
              dons_weeney liked this.
              Mar. 5 at 1:03 p.m.
              #3
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: May 2023
              Posts: 3,803
              Likes: 1,178
              Don’t see Kaliyev as anything the Bruins would want
              Mar. 5 at 1:04 p.m.
              #4
              Bcarlo25
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: May 2018
              Posts: 21,218
              Likes: 7,008
              Edited Mar. 5 at 1:24 p.m.
              i think people make too much of sweeney looking for guys he can get for multiple years. three pick ups last year, all of them gone. yes, zacha was extended, but he was RFA. Lindholm certainly the exception - it was clear they needed to be able to extend him. After that we're going back to Coyle. I think a better way to put it is if Sweeney is paying a premium price - a first and something significant, he wants term.

              This looks like a list of players for a team thats on the rise, but not a playoff team. reclamation projects, and guys needing to develop. Not exactly what the bruins should have in mind.
              Mar. 5 at 1:12 p.m.
              #5
              Thread Starter
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Sep. 2020
              Posts: 452
              Likes: 211
              Edited Mar. 5 at 1:19 p.m.
              Quoting: Bcarlo25
              i think people make too much of sweeney looking for guys he can get for multiple years.


              You mentioned Zacha and Coyle but forgot about Hall, Lindholm, Lazar, Reilly, Kase, Ritchie... If you look at his trade history, most of his trade acquisitions have played more than one season for us. Ullmark wasn't a trade acquisition so he doesn't really count towards this exercise one way or the other.

              Last year was an exception because it was a clear "all-in" season, everyone knew we couldn't keep anyone we traded for but it was worth a shot anyway. In normal circumstances he definitely prefers to acquire guys he can keep for more than one season.
              Mar. 5 at 1:18 p.m.
              #6
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jul. 2023
              Posts: 5,652
              Likes: 3,748
              Quoting: HairyBerry
              A Tuch trade just isn't happening. But Krebs on the other hand hasn’t seemed to find a scoring touch in Buffalo, but has skill and is stuck behind a lot of very talented young forwards.


              You’re correct, the Sabres are absolutely not trading Tuch

              You’re assessment of Krebs is off though
              He’s another guy we aren’t looking to move
              I get that from a glance it appears he’s buried on the the 4th line, BUT really, he anchors our “defensive” line and plays an important role for us. His point production has dropped this year bc injuries have had us rotating linemates for him, and while last year we got good performances from Girgensons & Okposo- both have fallen off this year.

              Krebs isn’t untouchable like Tuch is,
              but he’s not a guy we are looking to move & we definitely won’t “sell low” on him
              BUFF742 and RavensShadow liked this.
              Mar. 5 at 1:18 p.m.
              #7
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: May 2023
              Posts: 3,803
              Likes: 1,178
              Quoting: hairyberry
              You mentioned Zacha and Coyle but forgot about Hall, Lindholm, Lazar, Reilly, Kase, Ritchie... If you look at his trade history, most of his trade acquisitions have played more than one season for us.

              Last year was an exception because it was a clear "all-in" season, everyone knew we couldn't keep anyone we traded for but it was worth a shot anyway. In normal circumstances he definitely prefers to acquire guys he can keep for more than one season.


              What would you pay for Mittelstadt. Every time I ask a Sabre fan, they say Carlo. It sounds like Buffalo doesn’t want to pay him the contract necessary.

              I’d start with Lysell, cap filler, and a 2025 #1 if that’s a possibility.
              Mar. 5 at 1:18 p.m.
              #8
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jan. 2017
              Posts: 323
              Likes: 182
              I know most people here think that Ferraro is fairly meh, but the Sharks are fairly high on him and don't need to move him. It's unlikely they move him without it involving a 1st coming their way, even though many people think he's only worth a mid-round pick.
              Mar. 5 at 1:19 p.m.
              #9
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: May 2023
              Posts: 3,803
              Likes: 1,178
              Quoting: hairyberry
              You mentioned Zacha and Coyle but forgot about Hall, Lindholm, Lazar, Reilly, Kase, Ritchie... If you look at his trade history, most of his trade acquisitions have played more than one season for us.

              Last year was an exception because it was a clear "all-in" season, everyone knew we couldn't keep anyone we traded for but it was worth a shot anyway. In normal circumstances he definitely prefers to acquire guys he can keep for more than one season.


              But none of those guys had term when he acquired them. He resigned them after acquired. I’d be interested in Duclair for the right price

              Quoting: jamnjon
              I know most people here think that Ferraro is fairly meh, but the Sharks are fairly high on him and don't need to move him. It's unlikely they move him without it involving a 1st coming their way, even though many people think he's only worth a mid-round pick.


              I doubt he’s traded. His value and his statistics don’t align. It would need to be a pure scouting deal
              Mar. 5 at 1:23 p.m.
              #10
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jun. 2017
              Posts: 2,122
              Likes: 1,025
              I cant see the Sabres moving Krebs. He can play C up and down the lineup and is cheap, they also dont have anyone to replace him.
              Mar. 5 at 1:24 p.m.
              #11
              Bcarlo25
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: May 2018
              Posts: 21,218
              Likes: 7,008
              Quoting: hairyberry
              You mentioned Zacha and Coyle but forgot about Hall, Lindholm, Lazar, Reilly, Kase, Ritchie... If you look at his trade history, most of his trade acquisitions have played more than one season for us. Ullmark wasn't a trade acquisition so he doesn't really count towards this exercise one way or the other.

              Last year was an exception because it was a clear "all-in" season, everyone knew we couldn't keep anyone we traded for but it was worth a shot anyway. In normal circumstances he definitely prefers to acquire guys he can keep for more than one season.


              if you didn't delete most of my post, you would say that i most certainly did not forget lindholm. so don't do that. just leave the full post that you're quoting. Kase and Ritchie were both restricted, and Lazar, ya, he had term.


              edit: I said Ullmark instead of lindholm - mea culpa, but still - don't edit other peoples posts.
              Mar. 5 at 1:37 p.m.
              #12
              Thread Starter
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Sep. 2020
              Posts: 452
              Likes: 211
              Edited Mar. 5 at 1:46 p.m.
              Quoting: Celtics21
              But none of those guys had term when he acquired them.


              Yeah that's what I meant, he acquires guys that he can keep around in general, either because they have term already or he believes he can extend them.
              Mar. 5 at 1:42 p.m.
              #13
              Thread Starter
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Sep. 2020
              Posts: 452
              Likes: 211
              Quoting: Celtics21
              What would you pay for Mittelstadt. Every time I ask a Sabre fan, they say Carlo. It sounds like Buffalo doesn’t want to pay him the contract necessary.

              I’d start with Lysell, cap filler, and a 2025 #1 if that’s a possibility.


              Yeah Carlo is just a firm no, we'd be filling one hole and making another. I wouldn't touch the 2025 first, there's way too high of a probability we could be ass next year and then suddenly we're in a sens/sharks type situation where we accidentally gave up a top 5 pick. Lysell probably isn't interesting to the Sabres, given their glut of young forwards.

              I think the only way that deal might make sense for both sides is if it's a 3 team trade, where we trade Ullmark to Team X, Buffalo trades Mittelstadt to us, and Team X trades something the Sabres actually want to the Sabres.
              RavensShadow liked this.
               
              Reply
              To create a post please Login or Register
              Question:
              Options:
              Add Option
              Submit Poll