SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Retain on Lindholm To Make Jake Cheaper

Created by: edeangel84
Team: 2023-24 Pittsburgh Penguins
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 5, 2024
Published: Mar. 5, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
PIT
  1. Bains, Arshdeep
  2. Lindholm, Elias ($2,425,000 retained)
  3. Räty, Aatu
  4. 2025 1st round pick (VAN)
VAN
  1. Guentzel, Jake ($3,000,000 retained)
  2. Ruhwedel, Chad
2.
3.
PIT
  1. 2025 3rd round pick (NYI)
  2. 2026 5th round pick (NYI)
4.
TOR
  1. Nedeljkovic, Alex
  2. 2025 6th round pick (PIT)
5.
PIT
  1. Howden, Brett
  2. 2025 4th round pick (VGK)
6.
PIT
  1. 2025 7th round pick (NYI)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the NYR
2025
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the NYI
2026
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$78,880,176$0$82,500$4,619,824
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$925,000$925,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$8,700,000$8,700,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$6,100,000$6,100,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$775,000$775,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$816,667$816,667
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$836,667$836,667 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$1,900,000$1,900,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$800,000$800,000
RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$825,000$825,000
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$6,100,000$6,100,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,375,000$5,375,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,025,175$4,025,175
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$785,000$785,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,100,000$1,100,000
RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,125,000$3,125,000
RW, C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,125,000$5,125,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$900,000$900,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$775,000$775,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$775,000$775,000
LD
RFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 5 at 7:53 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 3,789
Likes: 1,208
It's painful to see Arshdeep Bains in a Penguin's jersey.
Seriously Very Angry
edeangel84 liked this.
Mar. 5 at 7:54 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 10,093
Likes: 9,353
Canucks aren’t adding Raty and a 1st to upgrade Lindholm to Guentzel
remowilliams liked this.
Mar. 5 at 7:56 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 148
Likes: 30
So Toronto trades one of their RHD (their top need) for 4th string goalie?
Mar. 5 at 8:04 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 122
Likes: 20
Meh….
Mar. 5 at 8:06 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
JimmyPaek
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 3,945
Likes: 1,175
Quoting: mv21227
Canucks aren’t adding Raty and a 1st to upgrade Lindholm to Guentzel


Ok then we can trade with Vegas and you can keep Lindholm.
Mar. 5 at 8:06 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
JimmyPaek
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 3,945
Likes: 1,175
Quoting: clinical
So Toronto trades one of their RHD (their top need) for 4th string goalie?


3rd at worst
Mar. 5 at 8:10 p.m.
#7
Avid Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 623
Likes: 308
Quoting: mv21227
Canucks aren’t adding Raty and a 1st to upgrade Lindholm to Guentzel


Only way we are is if we are getting the Boston return. Teams have learned from the Duchene trade.
mv21227 and remowilliams liked this.
Mar. 5 at 8:19 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 2,273
Likes: 699
Toronto very much does not need another goalie
Mar. 5 at 8:23 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 3,772
Likes: 1,172
Quoting: edeangel84
Ok then we can trade with Vegas and you can keep Lindholm.


They just acquired Mantha. Great get for Vegas
Mar. 5 at 8:25 p.m.
#10
Juice World
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2018
Posts: 218
Likes: 26
good, now trade Jarry. that game against Calgary was all his fault bro can't cover the five hole wit his stick and got the catching ability of Matt Murray
Mar. 5 at 8:29 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
JimmyPaek
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 3,945
Likes: 1,175
Quoting: Celtics21
They just acquired Mantha. Great get for Vegas


Ok get, I think a 2nd alone was more than enough. He’s not good enough to move the needle.
Mar. 5 at 8:30 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
JimmyPaek
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 3,945
Likes: 1,175
Quoting: zRxstrictxd_88
good, now trade Jarry. that game against Calgary was all his fault bro can't cover the five hole wit his stick and got the catching ability of Matt Murray


lol what? That game was the entire team’s fault, especially Tanger and EK. Jarry let in one soft one.
Mar. 5 at 8:43 p.m.
#13
Big Shoots
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 3,570
Likes: 1,087
Quoting: edeangel84
Ok then we can trade with Vegas and you can keep Lindholm.


Whatever we get from Boston would go to you maybe plus a small piece. You have Guentzel's value too high here. No one would pay that.
Mar. 5 at 8:55 p.m.
#14
Nightowl26
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 1,524
Likes: 451
Isles don't pick up the phone...
Mar. 5 at 9:13 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
JimmyPaek
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 3,945
Likes: 1,175
Quoting: BigShoots
Whatever we get from Boston would go to you maybe plus a small piece. You have Guentzel's value too high here. No one would pay that.


Pay what? A couple of alright prospects and a 1st for a top 15 winger in the league?
Mar. 5 at 9:38 p.m.
#16
SkateOrDie
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 345
Quoting: BigShoots
Whatever we get from Boston would go to you maybe plus a small piece. You have Guentzel's value too high here. No one would pay that.


you keep thinking your getting a 40 goal scorer for nothing.
It's a good thing JR makes the decisions in VAN and realizes he has to give assets to get them and not you.
Otherwise VAN would never make a single trade ever.
You can be assured if JR wants Jake, he's giving up the pieces to make it work.
Mar. 5 at 11:32 p.m.
#17
Big Shoots
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 3,570
Likes: 1,087
Quoting: edeangel84
Pay what? A couple of alright prospects and a 1st for a top 15 winger in the league?


You somehow ended up with 5 assets for renting Guentzel. That is not going to happen.
Mar. 5 at 11:33 p.m.
#18
Big Shoots
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 3,570
Likes: 1,087
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
you keep thinking your getting a 40 goal scorer for nothing.
It's a good thing JR makes the decisions in VAN and realizes he has to give assets to get them and not you.
Otherwise VAN would never make a single trade ever.
You can be assured if JR wants Jake, he's giving up the pieces to make it work.


I didn't say that. It'll cost a 1st, pospect and cap dumpish roster player/late pick/b prospect. Wing is not a premium position. And it's a rental. You don't get 5 assets for that type of asset.
Mar. 6 at 12:12 a.m.
#19
Thread Starter
JimmyPaek
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 3,945
Likes: 1,175
Quoting: BigShoots
I didn't say that. It'll cost a 1st, pospect and cap dumpish roster player/late pick/b prospect. Wing is not a premium position. And it's a rental. You don't get 5 assets for that type of asset.


We don’t need a cap dump lol.
Mar. 6 at 12:22 a.m.
#20
SkateOrDie
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 345
Quoting: BigShoots
I didn't say that. It'll cost a 1st, pospect and cap dumpish roster player/late pick/b prospect. Wing is not a premium position. And it's a rental. You don't get 5 assets for that type of asset.


the "he's a rental part" doesn't mean anything.
You have no idea if they allowed them to work out a deal before the trade. You are just assuming.
I'm sure PIT knows exactly what Jake wants and can forward that info to who ever is interested.

Fact is it's the "prospect" part you refuse to recognize your own lacking. You don't want to part with a legit prospect.
That's the hold up on your end.
Don't think JR thinks the same way. He will rifle a prospect out.
The 1st is relative. A guy like Lysell is worth no more than the 1st. Simply swapping them is no big deal.
You aren't talking some top 5 pick here. It's like BOS building up Donato or telling everyone Studnicka was going to be the Bergeron replacement.
He's just a mediocre prospect at this point, no different then the 1st he'd be replacing.

Fact is you short the trade unwilling to part with assets. You think, oh I'll dump whatever dud prospect and the other team has to accept it's "a prospect"
But that just isn't how it works.

Bains and Raty just aren't the level of prospect going to get this done. Neither is Pod.

It's not about "5 assets"
It's about getting quality for a quality forward they are sending out.
And a 40 goal guy who puts up that pace regularly is going to get that quality no matter what you think.
You don't get something for nothing. You got to pay to get what you want, like everyone else.
When PIT traded for Kessel it cost their 1st, their best prospect in Kapanan who was well received at that point, and other stuff.
It's no different for you or VAN. And you are getting a better player back, who has none of the drama that surrounded Kessel.
If JR would pay it then, yet you think he won't pay it now? Or that you are too cheap to pay it, well you got another thing coming if you want that chance to win a cup.
Mar. 6 at 12:55 a.m.
#21
Big Shoots
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 3,570
Likes: 1,087
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
the "he's a rental part" doesn't mean anything.
You have no idea if they allowed them to work out a deal before the trade. You are just assuming.
I'm sure PIT knows exactly what Jake wants and can forward that info to who ever is interested.

Fact is it's the "prospect" part you refuse to recognize your own lacking. You don't want to part with a legit prospect.
That's the hold up on your end.
Don't think JR thinks the same way. He will rifle a prospect out.
The 1st is relative. A guy like Lysell is worth no more than the 1st. Simply swapping them is no big deal.
You aren't talking some top 5 pick here. It's like BOS building up Donato or telling everyone Studnicka was going to be the Bergeron replacement.
He's just a mediocre prospect at this point, no different then the 1st he'd be replacing.

Fact is you short the trade unwilling to part with assets. You think, oh I'll dump whatever dud prospect and the other team has to accept it's "a prospect"
But that just isn't how it works.

Bains and Raty just aren't the level of prospect going to get this done. Neither is Pod.

It's not about "5 assets"
It's about getting quality for a quality forward they are sending out.
And a 40 goal guy who puts up that pace regularly is going to get that quality no matter what you think.
You don't get something for nothing. You got to pay to get what you want, like everyone else.
When PIT traded for Kessel it cost their 1st, their best prospect in Kapanan who was well received at that point, and other stuff.
It's no different for you or VAN. And you are getting a better player back, who has none of the drama that surrounded Kessel.
If JR would pay it then, yet you think he won't pay it now? Or that you are too cheap to pay it, well you got another thing coming if you want that chance to win a cup.


In all reality whether it's a rental or a long term deal negotiated the return is the same. Rental carries the risk of him leaving, long term contract carriers the late yrs risk. See Horvat and many others as examples.

Lysell is a legit prospect. A 1st is a legit prospect. Raty is a legit prospect. The others are trending to be solid bottom 6 players.

To be fair the proposal is horrible value trading Lindholm away. Should be Lysell and 1st at least. Probably a bit more.

If you think you're getting Willander or Lekkerimaki that's unrealistic. If you think you are getting 5 assets and no cap thats unrealistic.

We are giving up Lindholm in this deal too hahah he just cost a 1st ++

Anyway Guentzel will get a 1st, prospect, and one more thing that has negligible value. That's just what it costs for rentals or 30 yrs old sign long term wingers. no matter that hes a great player.
Mar. 6 at 12:55 a.m.
#22
Big Shoots
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 3,570
Likes: 1,087
Quoting: edeangel84
We don’t need a cap dump lol.


It's kinda how these trades often work if you want full value. It may seem like an ok player at the time of the trade.
Mar. 6 at 12:57 a.m.
#23
Thread Starter
JimmyPaek
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 3,945
Likes: 1,175
Quoting: BigShoots
It's kinda how these trades often work if you want full value. It may seem like an ok player at the time of the trade.


Mikheyev is not an ok player. He is a waste and a bad contract. We don’t need to take him to do you a solid.
Mar. 6 at 1:01 a.m.
#24
Big Shoots
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 3,570
Likes: 1,087
Quoting: edeangel84
Mikheyev is not an ok player. He is a waste and a bad contract. We don’t need to take him to do you a solid.


Hahah someone is testy. I never mentioned him.
Mar. 6 at 1:02 a.m.
#25
Thread Starter
JimmyPaek
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 3,945
Likes: 1,175
Quoting: BigShoots
Hahah someone is testy. I never mentioned him.


He’s in over half of the “rip us off” ACGM’s
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll