Nope, not a chance NJD does that

Wow that was quick lol. What would you as a Jersey fan suggest for Marky then?

I like the thinking, don't think san jose is going to trade back that far though. Probably better off trying to get jerseys 2024 1st if we want tij

Very little in the offseason tbh and frankly at this point I wouldn't bother negotiating with a GM who apparently doesn't have the authority to trade Markstrom. I'd say calgary missed the boat.

Holtz for Markstrom perhaps…pick for $$.

Remove Duehr and the Marky trade is acceptable but Murray Edwards probably won't allow any retention which would kill the deal. Removing Duehr, Stillman and the retention would be acceptable too.

Retention on Mangiapane won't happen either unless the return is better.

That's a terrible take, you're going to nix a deal for a 1st and grade a prospect over Duehr? He's a 13th forward on our team.

Calgary needs more right shot forwards not fewer. Could remove Schwindt instead but I figured since he's 4 years younger and can play center or wing NJ would prefer him over Duehr. I did say Stillman could be removed too and he's more valuable than Duehr or Schwindt.

Both the jersey players in this trade are right shots. Calgary probably has to add not subtract from this.

You beat my edit. I'm assuming Stillman and the retention on Marky would be removed too because like I said Murray Edwards probably won't allow any retention on Marky.

Depends on placement of the picks, but strong chance the Sharks decline.

The Canucks have a strong chance to win the Pacific division which means that their pick would be at best 25th and that's if all 4 division winners are eliminated in the 1st round and the Canucks have the fewest points. The Pittsburgh pick is currently 11. Going into future drafts reduces the value of picks, so the 2025 2nd and 3rd have less value than the 2024 2nd and 3rd.

A couple of years back when Arizona wanted to move from 27 to 11 it cost them pick 27, 34, and 45 and here you're looking at something likely in the same vicinity (27ish to 11ish) so it should cost around an early and a mid 2nd in the same draft. Ciona was an honorable mention on The Athletic's recent top 15 prospects for the Flames list, so he doesn't move the needle too much.

I don't think it's too far off, I just think it takes a bit more, especially this year since this is a draft that teams were more willing than normal to trade 1sts if they were expected to be after the 20th pick because of the expected drop after that point.

Edit: This is also before factoring in the possibility of the Pit 1st being a lottery pick in 2025 if they fall into the top 10 this year and opt to defer the pick.