SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Florida Pt 2

Created by: mhmhvancouver
Team: 2024-25 Florida Panthers
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 11, 2024
Published: Mar. 12, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
2$925,000
2$850,000
3$800,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$800,000
1$850,000
1$800,000
2$900,000
2$800,000
1$800,000
2$800,000
2$825,000
2$825,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$825,000
1$800,000
2$900,000
2$1,650,000
2$800,000
1$800,000
1$1,050,000
8$9,750,000
2$800,000
Trades
1.
FLA
  1. 2025 4th round pick (PIT)
PIT
    Anthony Stolarz
    2.
    FLA
    1. Mukhamadullin, Shakir
    2. Russell, Mitchell
    3. Thompson, Jack
    4. 2025 1st round pick (VGK)
    5. 2025 4th round pick (SJS)
    SJS
    1. Lundell, Anton [RFA Rights]
    3.
    FLA
    1. Kaut, Martin [Reserve List]
    SJS
    1. 2026 5th round pick (FLA)
    4.
    FLA
    1. 2026 2nd round pick (ANA)
    Buyouts
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2024
    Logo of the FLA
    Logo of the FLA
    Logo of the PHI
    Logo of the FLA
    2025
    Logo of the VGK
    Logo of the FLA
    Logo of the FLA
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the FLA
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the FLA
    2026
    Logo of the FLA
    Logo of the FLA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the FLA
    Logo of the FLA
    Logo of the FLA
    Logo of the FLA
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$83,500,000$84,400,001$0$400,000-$900,001
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $9,750,000$9,750,000
    RW
    UFA
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $10,000,000$10,000,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $9,500,000$9,500,000
    RW
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $4,166,667$4,166,667
    LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    LW, C
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    LW, C
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $900,000$900,000
    LW, C
    UFA
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $4,425,000$4,425,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $925,000$925,000
    RW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $800,000$800,000
    LW, RW
    UFA
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $847,500$847,500
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $800,000$800,000
    LW, C
    RFA
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $5,750,000$5,750,000
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $7,500,000$7,500,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $4,500,000$4,500,000
    G
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
    LD
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $825,000$825,000
    LD/RD
    RFA
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $10,000,000$10,000,000
    G
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $1,650,000$1,650,000
    LD
    UFA
    $800,000$800,000
    RD
    UFA
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $800,000$800,000
    RD
    UFA
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $775,000$775,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $800,000$800,000
    C, RW
    UFA

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Mar. 12 at 3:38 p.m.
    #1
    Once a Kings Fan Too
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2018
    Posts: 40,350
    Likes: 25,266
    Anaheim wouldn't give a future fourth-round draft pick for Evan Nause.
    Mar. 12 at 3:49 p.m.
    #2
    Stovetop
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 1,976
    Likes: 864
    Take out Shakir, the 1st, and Thompson and Sharks say yes. Lundell is a third liner, this is a complete joke
    DFinn91 and glarson17 liked this.
    Mar. 12 at 4:00 p.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2021
    Posts: 514
    Likes: 191
    Easy no from the Sharks. I like Lundell but wouldn’t do anything more than a guaranteed late 1st (the Vegas pick is unprotected and you never know what can happen) and a B prospect.
    Mar. 12 at 4:18 p.m.
    #4
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2019
    Posts: 2,089
    Likes: 712
    Quoting: AStovetop
    Take out Shakir, the 1st, and Thompson and Sharks say yes. Lundell is a third liner, this is a complete joke

    That’s a joke right? He’d be your best player immediately
    Mar. 12 at 4:27 p.m.
    #5
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 15,433
    Likes: 11,824
    Nause plays in the coast, good luck getting anything for him
    Mar. 12 at 4:59 p.m.
    #6
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2022
    Posts: 699
    Likes: 314
    Quoting: AStovetop
    Take out Shakir, the 1st, and Thompson and Sharks say yes. Lundell is a third liner, this is a complete joke


    3rd liner on the best team… dude is easily a 2C at this point, will be a 1C in 3-5 years.
    Mar. 12 at 5:39 p.m.
    #7
    Stovetop
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 1,976
    Likes: 864
    Quoting: Hockey91
    That’s a joke right? He’d be your best player immediately


    Lol stop. Eklund is in his first year on the worst offensive team and has better production. Granlund has been excellent. Lundell's ceiling isn't much higher than what he's at now. He's only regressed since his rookie year getting easy matchups. Shakir has top pairing potential, Thompson was JUST acquired and is a great 2nd pairing potential, 2-way RHD. Add to that an unprotected 1st from a team that's bairly in the playoffs and will have to shed cap like crazy next season.

    Yes obviously I'm joking about just Russell and a 4th for Lundell but that's less absurd than the return proposed here
    Mar. 12 at 5:43 p.m.
    #8
    Stovetop
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 1,976
    Likes: 864
    Quoting: Rolfadinho
    3rd liner on the best team… dude is easily a 2C at this point, will be a 1C in 3-5 years.


    He wouldn't be shopped around by so many Panthers fans if he were seen as a 2C. He has that potential but he's only regressed since his rookie year and until he can show he can get back to that level, he's not interesting for an insane return like this
    Mar. 12 at 7:16 p.m.
    #9
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2022
    Posts: 699
    Likes: 314
    Quoting: AStovetop
    He wouldn't be shopped around by so many Panthers fans if he were seen as a 2C. He has that potential but he's only regressed since his rookie year and until he can show he can get back to that level, he's not interesting for an insane return like this


    Most of the shopping around is being done by other fan bases who want him badly.
    Mar. 12 at 7:23 p.m.
    #10
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2019
    Posts: 2,089
    Likes: 712
    Quoting: AStovetop
    Lol stop. Eklund is in his first year on the worst offensive team and has better production. Granlund has been excellent. Lundell's ceiling isn't much higher than what he's at now. He's only regressed since his rookie year getting easy matchups. Shakir has top pairing potential, Thompson was JUST acquired and is a great 2nd pairing potential, 2-way RHD. Add to that an unprotected 1st from a team that's bairly in the playoffs and will have to shed cap like crazy next season.

    Yes obviously I'm joking about just Russell and a 4th for Lundell but that's less absurd than the return proposed here

    Yes because eklund is playing on the 90% offensive line starts. Lundell is already a top defensive center playing no pp minutes and all pk minutes while shutting down teams upper 2 lines. Nothing but skakir does anything for Florida here. A first is useless to them and the other two are ahl players so you can keep them. The first and shakir is what it would take to move lundell
    Mar. 12 at 9:32 p.m.
    #11
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2021
    Posts: 1,029
    Likes: 515
    absolutely brutal trade
    Mar. 12 at 9:34 p.m.
    #12
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2021
    Posts: 1,029
    Likes: 515
    Quoting: Hockey91
    That’s a joke right? He’d be your best player immediately


    I mean like he'd have more impact on San Jose than he does on Florida but no he wouldn't be our best player lol
    Mar. 12 at 10:38 p.m.
    #13
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2019
    Posts: 2,089
    Likes: 712
    Quoting: Letsgosharks
    I mean like he'd have more impact on San Jose than he does on Florida but no he wouldn't be our best player lol


    Then who is. Granlund? I might be your best this season but he’s certainly far from a teams top player and not a player you build a team around. He’d be your best player now. Maybe not down the road when your young guys grow their game but he’d be your barkov type with the right players.
    Mar. 12 at 10:43 p.m.
    #14
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2021
    Posts: 1,029
    Likes: 515
    Quoting: Hockey91
    Then who is. Granlund? I might be your best this season but he’s certainly far from a teams top player and not a player you build a team around. He’d be your best player now. Maybe not down the road when your young guys grow their game but he’d be your barkov type with the right players.


    Yeah probs granny or eklund, I mean I get your point but its not like he would be far and above our best player, maybe given an opportunity on San Jose's top line or something he will perform as our best player, but who knows. I would love to see him on San Jose.
    Hockey91 liked this.
    Mar. 12 at 11:52 p.m.
    #15
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 8,150
    Likes: 3,638
    All that for Lundell? lol what? How about barkov instead
    Mar. 13 at 11:36 a.m.
    #16
    Stovetop
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 1,976
    Likes: 864
    Quoting: Hockey91
    Yes because eklund is playing on the 90% offensive line starts. Lundell is already a top defensive center playing no pp minutes and all pk minutes while shutting down teams upper 2 lines. Nothing but skakir does anything for Florida here. A first is useless to them and the other two are ahl players so you can keep them. The first and shakir is what it would take to move lundell


    How is a first useless to any team. That's legit the dumbest thing I've read. Sharks wouldn't trade Shakir for Lundell one for one.
    Mar. 13 at 12:09 p.m.
    #17
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2019
    Posts: 2,089
    Likes: 712
    Quoting: AStovetop
    How is a first useless to any team. That's legit the dumbest thing I've read. Sharks wouldn't trade Shakir for Lundell one for one.


    Because the panthers are in win now mode. Not trade assets for parts that won’t play for them for 4 years. So yes useless to them.
    Mar. 13 at 12:11 p.m.
    #18
    Stovetop
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 1,976
    Likes: 864
    Quoting: Hockey91
    Because the panthers are in win now mode. Not trade assets for parts that won’t play for them for 4 years. So yes useless to them.


    I'm not saying they should trade Lundell, but to say a 1st doesn't have value to them is a completely other thing. That's completely false
    Mar. 13 at 12:18 p.m.
    #19
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2019
    Posts: 2,089
    Likes: 712
    Quoting: AStovetop
    I'm not saying they should trade Lundell, but to say a 1st doesn't have value to them is a completely other thing. That's completely false

    I mean a pick in the 30’s isnt very valuable to a team trying to win a cup. If they trade lundell it’s not for a pick.
    Mar. 13 at 12:24 p.m.
    #20
    Stovetop
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 1,976
    Likes: 864
    Quoting: Hockey91
    I mean a pick in the 30’s isnt very valuable to a team trying to win a cup. If they trade lundell it’s not for a pick.


    Vegas is literally barely hanging onto a wilcard spot and they're about 300 mil over the cap. And the Sharks drafted Musty at 26 and he's absolutely nasty
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll