SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

SJ should go after Parekh

Created by: Caufield
Team: 2023-24 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 13, 2024
Published: Mar. 13, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
2024 SJ 1st becomes Celebrini, Demidov, or Lindstrom depending on the lottery

This is just a potential lineup down the road, not the 2024-25 lineup

PIT pick finishes to be at 12 OA
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$975,000
3$975,000
3$975,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Celebrini, Macklin
3$975,000
Parekh, Zayne
3$975,000
Trades
SJS
  1. 2024 1st round pick (BUF)
Additional Details:
For 8th OA, I think it should be high enough to get Parekh. Worst case scenario, they get Buium or Dickinson
BUF
  1. Benning, Matthew
  2. 2024 1st round pick (PIT)
  3. 2026 2nd round pick (SJS)
Additional Details:
BUF gets reliable RD, and a pick to move down 4 spots
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the SJS
2025
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NJD
2026
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
26$83,500,000$68,955,001$25,000$1,632,500$14,544,999
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
RFA - 3
Celebrini, Macklin
$975,000$975,000
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$950,000$950,000
LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$950,000$950,000
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$975,000$975,000
C
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$916,667$916,667
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$950,000$950,000
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$940,000$940,000 (Performance Bonus$30,000$30K)
RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$975,000$975,000
C
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RW, C
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
LD
RFA - 2
Parekh, Zayne
$975,000$975,000
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$775,000$775,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$975,000$975,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$867,500$867,500 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$912,500$912,500 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$825,000$825,000
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,350,000$2,350,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$775,000$775,000
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$828,333$828,333 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
RD
RFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 13 at 6:06 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 8,256
Likes: 6,241
Nah, Buffalo doesn't need to trade back to stockpile futures.
Mar. 13 at 6:08 p.m.
#2
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 42,976
Likes: 23,978
Sens will take him way before that pick lol
Mar. 13 at 6:14 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Reinbacher Josi 2.0
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2022
Posts: 4,140
Likes: 2,290
Quoting: csick
Sens will take him way before that pick lol


Personally, I'm predicting Demidov or Lindstrom to OTT
Mar. 13 at 6:14 p.m.
#4
Stovetop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 1,976
Likes: 864
Quoting: csick
Sens will take him way before that pick lol


You think they'd take him over Levshunov & Yakemchuk?
Mar. 13 at 6:15 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Reinbacher Josi 2.0
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2022
Posts: 4,140
Likes: 2,290
Quoting: AStovetop
You think they'd take him over Levshunov & Yakemchuk?


Likely over Yakemchuk, but Lev should def be drafted over Parekh
Mar. 13 at 6:17 p.m.
#6
Stovetop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 1,976
Likes: 864
Quoting: Caufield
Likely over Yakemchuk, but Lev should def be drafted over Parekh


They wouldn't draft Levshunov over Celebrini I imagine, right? They'd probably look to deal Norris for a young RHD if they got him

Idk how desperate they are
Mar. 13 at 6:21 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Reinbacher Josi 2.0
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2022
Posts: 4,140
Likes: 2,290
Quoting: AStovetop
They wouldn't draft Levshunov over Celebrini I imagine, right? They'd probably look to deal Norris for a young RHD if they got him

Idk how desperate they are


OTT is likely drafting 5-7, so its more of the case of if Lev slips, who they pick. But obviously, Celebrini goes 1, no matter the team
csick liked this.
Mar. 13 at 6:21 p.m.
#8
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 42,976
Likes: 23,978
Quoting: AStovetop
They wouldn't draft Levshunov over Celebrini I imagine, right? They'd probably look to deal Norris for a young RHD if they got him

Idk how desperate they are


At 1 no . At 2 , I’d take RD yes
Mar. 13 at 6:22 p.m.
#9
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 42,976
Likes: 23,978
Quoting: Caufield
OTT is likely drafting 5-7, so its more of the case of if Lev slips, who they pick. But obviously, Celebrini goes 1, no matter the team


Yeah Lev goes 2-4 imo
Caufield liked this.
Mar. 13 at 6:26 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Reinbacher Josi 2.0
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2022
Posts: 4,140
Likes: 2,290
Quoting: csick
Yeah Lev goes 2-4 imo


extremely likely that is the case.
If Lindstrom and/or Demidov is available for OTT, do you think they are they taking one of them, or fill in need and go for Parekh or Yakemchuk ?
csick liked this.
Mar. 13 at 6:34 p.m.
#11
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 42,976
Likes: 23,978
Quoting: Caufield
extremely likely that is the case.
If Lindstrom and/or Demidov is available for OTT, do you think they are they taking one of them, or fill in need and go for Parekh or Yakemchuk ?


If Lev and Parekh are gone , im taking one of Demidov, Catton or Lindstrom for sure. 6-7 is too high for Yakemchuk for me and would be leaving a lot of talent on the board
Caufield liked this.
Mar. 13 at 6:42 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Reinbacher Josi 2.0
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2022
Posts: 4,140
Likes: 2,290
Quoting: csick
If Lev and Parekh are gone , im taking one of Demidov, Catton or Lindstrom for sure. 6-7 is too high for Yakemchuk for me and would be leaving a lot of talent on the board


Makes sense!
csick liked this.
Mar. 13 at 7:12 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 5,614
Likes: 3,744
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Sabres aren’t doing that garbage trade
Wow

Benning for a 1st is one thing- but for a top10 pick???
Thanks for the laugh
Mar. 13 at 7:14 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Reinbacher Josi 2.0
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2022
Posts: 4,140
Likes: 2,290
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Sabres aren’t doing that garbage trade
Wow

Benning for a 1st is one thing- but for a top10 pick???
Thanks for the laugh


Hard to read ain't it? Moving down 4 spots, from 8 to 12th. You then get Benning and a 2nd for doing so.
No wonder people call you a troll on this site
Mar. 13 at 7:17 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 5,614
Likes: 3,744
Quoting: Caufield
Hard to read ain't it? Moving down 4 spots, from 8 to 12th. You then get Benning and a 2nd for doing so.
No wonder people call you a troll on this site


Sabres are NOT doing that
Sorry
Mar. 13 at 7:19 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Reinbacher Josi 2.0
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2022
Posts: 4,140
Likes: 2,290
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
Sabres are NOT doing that
Sorry


maybe they aren't, but reread what you said, and compare it to the trade I made. Completely different stuff.

Proof read yourself next time
ChestNut33 liked this.
Mar. 13 at 7:22 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 5,614
Likes: 3,744
Quoting: Caufield
maybe they aren't, but reread what you said, and compare it to the trade I made. Completely different stuff.

Proof read yourself next time


Your nonsense was only worth an abridged response
Benning isn’t a good enough main piece to get you into the top10, even if it’s just trading back

And Benning isn’t a guy we’d likely target anyways
Sorry dude, Sabres aren’t doing this
ZERO CHANCE
Mar. 13 at 7:26 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Reinbacher Josi 2.0
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2022
Posts: 4,140
Likes: 2,290
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
Your nonsense was only worth an abridged response
Benning isn’t a good enough main piece to get you into the top10, even if it’s just trading back

And Benning isn’t a guy we’d likely target anyways
Sorry dude, Sabres aren’t doing this
ZERO CHANCE


Benning is worth about a late 1st. There is 2nd attached, 1 st and 2nd are fair value to move 12 to 8. Not saying you wrongfully are declining the package, but it's definitely fair
Mar. 13 at 7:29 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 5,614
Likes: 3,744
Quoting: Caufield
Benning is worth about a late 1st. There is 2nd attached, 1 st and 2nd are fair value to move 12 to 8. Not saying you wrongfully are declining the package, but it's definitely fair


Doesn’t matter of it’s fair value if….
1- we aren’t interested in Benning
AND
2- we aren’t looking to trade back

This trade doesn’t work from the SABRES PERSPECTIVE
I’m sorry u can’t seem to grasp that, but idk how else to tell ya
Mar. 13 at 7:35 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Reinbacher Josi 2.0
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2022
Posts: 4,140
Likes: 2,290
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
Doesn’t matter of it’s fair value if….
1- we aren’t interested in Benning
AND
2- we aren’t looking to trade back

This trade doesn’t work from the SABRES PERSPECTIVE
I’m sorry u can’t seem to grasp that, but idk how else to tell ya


IDK bro, you're the one who said it was and laughed at the offer like it was bad when it clearly isn't. I got your little message, no need to repeat that s*** 3 times
Mar. 13 at 8:43 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 5,614
Likes: 3,744
Quoting: Caufield
IDK bro, you're the one who said it was and laughed at the offer like it was bad when it clearly isn't. I got your little message, no need to repeat that s*** 3 times


Sabres aren’t doing this trade
It doesn’t work FOR US
The End
Mar. 13 at 8:47 p.m.
#22
Thread Starter
Reinbacher Josi 2.0
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2022
Posts: 4,140
Likes: 2,290
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
Sabres aren’t doing this trade
It doesn’t work FOR US
The End

You sure you not a bot?
Mar. 13 at 8:51 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 5,614
Likes: 3,744
Quoting: Caufield
You sure you not a bot?


I’m sure u don’t understand how a trade has to work for BOTH SIDES
Mar. 13 at 8:57 p.m.
#24
Thread Starter
Reinbacher Josi 2.0
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2022
Posts: 4,140
Likes: 2,290
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
I’m sure u don’t understand how a trade has to work for BOTH SIDES


I told you pretty clearly I understand what you said, and don't need to repeat the same BS every time you speak
Mar. 13 at 9:02 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 5,614
Likes: 3,744
Quoting: Caufield
I told you pretty clearly I understand what you said, and don't need to repeat the same BS every time you speak


Except u clearly don’t understand,
bc u still seem to think it’s a good trade for Buffalo
Except it’s not what we NEED
And it’s not what we’d WANT

But don’t worry, I’ve wasted enough time with you
I’ll just hit that little button & be on my way
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll