SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Rolling in Dough

Created by: Missouri
Team: 2024-25 Nashville Predators
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 15, 2024
Published: Mar. 25, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
This is a simulated result of what trades/signings were made in our GHL GM League for a simulated off-season.

GM's were tasked with the job of getting their team ready for the season. They had to stay within the salary cap restrictions and must have a maximum of 6 players on the Taxi Squad for injury relief purposes.

Your job is to comment and evaluate how the GM managed their team.

Questions to answer:
1. What was the best move made by the GM?
2. What was the worst move made by the GM?
3. Did the GM improve the team or make them worse?

Thank you for playing! Our GHL GM League is played for a couple of months then posted on CapFriendly for everyone to see the results made by the GM's!
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$950,000
2$2,500,000
3$800,000
2$800,000
2$800,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$2,800,000
3$800,000
3$800,000
3$6,500,000
Trades
1.
NSH
  1. Smith, Reilly
  2. 2026 5th round pick (PIT)
PIT
  1. Lauzon, Jérémy
  2. 2025 3rd round pick (NSH)
  3. 2026 4th round pick (NSH)
2.
NSH
  1. Boqvist, Adam ($1,000,000 retained)
CBJ
  1. 2025 4th round pick (NSH)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the EDM
2025
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the COL
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
2026
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$88,000,000$87,479,199$0$932,500$520,801

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$8,500,000$8,500,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$3,185,000$3,185,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LW, RW
UFA
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LW, RW
RFA
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$2,500,000$2,500,000
C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$797,500$797,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$900,000$900,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$950,000$950,000
C
RFA
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$2,857,143$2,857,143
C, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$9,059,000$9,059,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,600,000$1,600,000
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$2,800,000$2,800,000
RD
UFA
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$800,000$800,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$800,000$800,000
LD
RFA
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$800,000$800,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW, C
RFA
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$775,000$775,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$800,000$800,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW
RFA
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$775,000$775,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$800,000$800,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RD
UFA
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$800,000$800,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RD
UFA

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 25 at 3:26 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 823
Likes: 436
All in all, not a bad job.

1. Best move made: Securing Carrier to that deal. Carrier has been a rockstar defensively for NSH and the deal and term are honestly great imo and it solidifies the right side so NSH can continue looking for a true 1st pair RD.

2. Worst move made: The Reilly Smith deal. This deal is honestly less than ideal. Nothing against Smith, but the issue is the contract. If NSH was to go out and get Teravainen, then I'd rather fill in that gap either with another free agency move or internally with someone like L'Heureux, who has had a monster 1st season in the AHL and could compete for significantly cheaper and not have to give up assets and that much cap space for someone who doesn't have a long term spot on the team.

Overall: the team is improved, but not really in a way that I think would be best for the team long-term
Missouri liked this.
Mar. 25 at 4:10 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Retired V2 V3 GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 3,614
Likes: 1,141
Quoting: AEcho
All in all, not a bad job.

1. Best move made: Securing Carrier to that deal. Carrier has been a rockstar defensively for NSH and the deal and term are honestly great imo and it solidifies the right side so NSH can continue looking for a true 1st pair RD.

2. Worst move made: The Reilly Smith deal. This deal is honestly less than ideal. Nothing against Smith, but the issue is the contract. If NSH was to go out and get Teravainen, then I'd rather fill in that gap either with another free agency move or internally with someone like L'Heureux, who has had a monster 1st season in the AHL and could compete for significantly cheaper and not have to give up assets and that much cap space for someone who doesn't have a long term spot on the team.

Overall: the team is improved, but not really in a way that I think would be best for the team long-term


Thanks for the comments! Yeah my personal opinion is the signings done by the GM were good, but the trades were pretty bad in my opinion. Well not necessarily bad, just not ideal like you said for Nashville.
Mar. 25 at 5:30 p.m.
#3
mostly harmless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 6,674
Likes: 3,158
Whoever's running the CBJ in your game did not do a very good job with that deal. IRL Boqvist would cost more than that; he was actually doing pretty well alongside Werenski and on the power play before he got injured yet again. Should be "at least a 2nd, more if you want retention" or thereabouts.
CaseyFlyman, benjgc and Missouri liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll