SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Canada - 4 Nations Face-off 2025

Created by: genothegoat
Team: 2023-24 Custom Team
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 27, 2024
Published: Mar. 27, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$83,500,000$152,803,000$0$3,500,000-$69,303,000

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$12,500,000$12,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$8,700,000$8,700,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$12,600,000$12,600,000
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$8,500,000$8,500,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$9,500,000$9,500,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Florida Panthers
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 4
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the New York Islanders
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,375,000$5,375,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$11,000,000$11,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$4,900,000$4,900,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 27 at 4:41 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 719
If Evan Bouchard plays for this team I'm cheering for everyone else. Dude can't play defense
Mar. 27 at 4:45 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 3,491
Likes: 1,176
Ridiculous to play Bedard at centre and put McJesus on the wing🤦🏻; come on 😕
CD282 liked this.
Mar. 27 at 4:48 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2023
Posts: 536
Likes: 189
Quoting: MitchJr
Ridiculous to play Bedard at centre and put McJesus on the wing🤦🏻; come on 😕


lol it was to put crosby mac and mcdavid tgt relax
Mar. 27 at 4:48 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2023
Posts: 536
Likes: 189
Quoting: Ste_Catherine_Street
If Evan Bouchard plays for this team I'm cheering for everyone else. Dude can't play defense


putting him with doughty would work but he is a great offensive threat
Mar. 27 at 5:00 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,044
Likes: 7,749
Quoting: Ste_Catherine_Street
If Evan Bouchard plays for this team I'm cheering for everyone else. Dude can't play defense


His defensive stats are miles better than Dobson's, for instance.

Bouchard v Dobson, 5v5 on-ice rates
He's clearly one of the best defensemen in the league right now, let alone one of the best Canadian defenseman.
genothegoat liked this.
Mar. 27 at 5:16 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 3,207
Likes: 1,077
I don't think Bouchard should sniff this team especially since he won't be on PP1
Mar. 27 at 5:18 p.m.
#7
Tank it baby
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 6,192
Likes: 4,242
Kadri won't be on this team and Theodore and Pietrangelo will.

Bouchard won't be there either.
Mar. 27 at 5:19 p.m.
#8
Tank it baby
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 6,192
Likes: 4,242
Quoting: CD282
His defensive stats are miles better than Dobson's, for instance.

Bouchard v Dobson, 5v5 on-ice rates
He's clearly one of the best defensemen in the league right now, let alone one of the best Canadian defenseman.


Says the biased Oilers fan. 🙄
Mar. 27 at 5:28 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,044
Likes: 7,749
Quoting: Ste_Catherine_Street
If Evan Bouchard plays for this team I'm cheering for everyone else. Dude can't play defense


Quoting: genothegoat
putting him with doughty would work but he is a great offensive threat

Looking at 5v5 "against" metrics:

CA/60
Bouchard: 47.15 **
Doughty: 53.02
Toews: 55.12
Morrissey: 56.91
Makar: 57.84
Dobson: 64.51

SA/60
Bouchard: 24.55 **
Doughty: 24.77
Toews: 27.75
Makar: 29.24
Morrissey: 29.78
Dobson: 31.37

xGA/60
Toews: 2.21
Bouchard: 2.26 **
Doughty: 2.28
Makar: 2.36
Morrissey: 2.55
Dobson: 2.65

SCA/60
Bouchard: 23.02 **
Toews: 23.86
Doughty: 24.73
Makar: 25.05
Morrissey: 25.75
Dobson: 30.06

HDCA/60
Bouchard: 9.27 **
Doughty: 9.67
Toews: 9.83
Makar: 9.98
Dobson: 11.71
Morrissey: 11.91

Of the 6 defensemen, Bouchard leads all defensive categories but one.

There is a defenseman who looks like he doesn't belong here, but it's not Evan Bouchard.
Mar. 27 at 5:29 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,044
Likes: 7,749
Quoting: SharkTank
Says the biased Oilers fan. 🙄

The numbers aren't biased. But your opinion clearly is.
Mar. 27 at 6:19 p.m.
#11
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,266
Likes: 11,347
Quoting: MitchJr
Ridiculous to play Bedard at centre and put McJesus on the wing🤦🏻; come on 😕


Actually, it's ridiculous that Bedard is on the team at all. And to put him as 2C? WOOF.
Mar. 27 at 6:20 p.m.
#12
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,266
Likes: 11,347
Quoting: CD282
Looking at 5v5 "against" metrics:

CA/60
Bouchard: 47.15 **
Doughty: 53.02
Toews: 55.12
Morrissey: 56.91
Makar: 57.84
Dobson: 64.51

SA/60
Bouchard: 24.55 **
Doughty: 24.77
Toews: 27.75
Makar: 29.24
Morrissey: 29.78
Dobson: 31.37

xGA/60
Toews: 2.21
Bouchard: 2.26 **
Doughty: 2.28
Makar: 2.36
Morrissey: 2.55
Dobson: 2.65

SCA/60
Bouchard: 23.02 **
Toews: 23.86
Doughty: 24.73
Makar: 25.05
Morrissey: 25.75
Dobson: 30.06

HDCA/60
Bouchard: 9.27 **
Doughty: 9.67
Toews: 9.83
Makar: 9.98
Dobson: 11.71
Morrissey: 11.91

Of the 6 defensemen, Bouchard leads all defensive categories but one.

There is a defenseman who looks like he doesn't belong here, but it's not Evan Bouchard.


You know these are not individual stats, right? It's super easy to have fewer shots and whatnot when McDrai and friends always have the puck at the other end.
Mar. 27 at 7:55 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,044
Likes: 7,749
Quoting: mokumboi
You know these are not individual stats, right? It's super easy to have fewer shots and whatnot when McDrai and friends always have the puck at the other end.


Are you ****ing serious? Do you know who Cale Makar is - and who he plays with?

Or are you saying McDavid / Draisaitl should win the Selke?
Mar. 27 at 8:16 p.m.
#14
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,266
Likes: 11,347
Quoting: CD282
Are you ****ing serious? Do you know who Cale Makar is - and who he plays with?

Or are you saying McDavid / Draisaitl should win the Selke?


Uhhh... what? It's like you did not read anything I said. Put away the odd strawmen and give it another go.

- Analytics are not individual stats.
- Spending less time in your own zone is going to boost your analytics.
- Having forwards who keep the puck down at the other end a lot allows one to spend less time in the D zone.

Nobody said anything about Selkes or Makar or whatever. And no amount of analytics is going to make Bouchard the current best of those six Dmen or analytics into anything more than auxiliary context providers. Obviously.
Mar. 28 at 5:02 a.m.
#15
Tank it baby
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 6,192
Likes: 4,242
Quoting: CD282
The numbers aren't biased. But your opinion clearly is.


I'd never want to agree with your spot picked "stats."
Mar. 28 at 11:30 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,044
Likes: 7,749
Quoting: SharkTank
I'd never want to agree with your spot picked "stats."

Spot picked? I posted a link to every single on-ice stat available.

Now we see who is biased.
Mar. 28 at 11:53 a.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,044
Likes: 7,749
Quoting: mokumboi
Uhhh... what? It's like you did not read anything I said. Put away the odd strawmen and give it another go.

- Analytics are not individual stats.
- Spending less time in your own zone is going to boost your analytics.
- Having forwards who keep the puck down at the other end a lot allows one to spend less time in the D zone.

Nobody said anything about Selkes or Makar or whatever. And no amount of analytics is going to make Bouchard the current best of those six Dmen or analytics into anything more than auxiliary context providers. Obviously.

On-ice stats are not individual, but they are still the product of the players on the ice. So you saying that Bouchard's sparkling defensive metrics are just because he plays with McDavid, and then turning around and denying that McDavid should get credit is a logical fallacy.

The fact is that the Oilers are the best team in the league when Bouchard is on the ice. Sure he doesn't get all the credit, but he's certainly part of it. Here's how you can know that: by looking at his results with and without McDavid.

CF%
Together: 62.36
w/o McDavid: 56.96
w/o Bouchard: 55.15
w/o either: 51.44

SF%
Together: 62.08
w/o McDavid: 57.91
w/o Bouchard: 55.39
w/o either: 50.51

xGF%
Together: 65.03
w/o McDavid: 57.00
w/o Bouchard: 57.57
w/o either: 52.51

SCF%
Together: 64.23
w/o McDavid: 58.03
w/o Bouchard: 56.84
w/o either: 52.01

HDCF%
Together: 67.16
w/o McDavid: 58.79
w/o Bouchard: 63.35
w/o either: 54.60

Bouchard is full value for his on-ice results, with or without McDavid.

Let's do the same for Makar, shall we?

CF%
Together: 55.95
w/o MacKinnon: 46.64
w/o Makar: 56.98
w/o either: 51.07

SF%
Together: 55.23
w/o MacKinnon: 48.01
w/o Makar: 57.51
w/o either: 51.04

xGF%
Together: 56.10
w/o MacKinnon: 48.10
w/o Makar: 58.61
w/o either: 49.38

SCF%
Together: 58.36
w/o MacKinnon: 48.54
w/o Makar: 61.16
w/o either: 51.61

HDCF%
Together: 57.70
w/o MacKinnon: 47.79
w/o Makar: 61.06
w/o either: 51.26

Wow, we can see who is driving the bus in Colorado, and it's certainly not Makar. He can't even break even w/o MacKinnon, and yet he's considered a lock to be a Norris finalist.
Mar. 28 at 1:17 p.m.
#18
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,266
Likes: 11,347
Quoting: CD282
On-ice stats are not individual, but they are still the product of the players on the ice. So you saying that Bouchard's sparkling defensive metrics are just because he plays with McDavid, and then turning around and denying that McDavid should get credit is a logical fallacy.

The fact is that the Oilers are the best team in the league when Bouchard is on the ice. Sure he doesn't get all the credit, but he's certainly part of it. Here's how you can know that: by looking at his results with and without McDavid.

Wow, we can see who is driving the bus in Colorado, and it's certainly not Makar. He can't even break even w/o MacKinnon, and yet he's considered a lock to be a Norris finalist.


1 - No, I did not say anything like that. And the credit I gave to McD is related to gaining and maintaining O zone time, which by the law of there's only one puck on the ice equates to less time spent in the D zone. I'm not even sure why he has to be a Selke candidate to be great at piling up O zone time.

2 - Except nobody said he should not get some credit. They said hey, let's not get crazy with the credit and add some perspective. Those are two different animals.

3 - Heh. Okay, man. You've conflated so much stuff that I don't even know how this relates to the original topic. And I've seen far too much of Makar to bother arguing over his play driving acumen. That's just kooky.

And just FYI...
Makar v Bouchard
1.33 Giveaways/60 2.49
2.23 Takeaways/60 1.67
1.19 Hits/60 2.11
4.39 Shot Blocks/60 3.49
0.76 D Zone Giveways/60 1.52
Mar. 28 at 1:55 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,044
Likes: 7,749
Quoting: mokumboi
1 - No, I did not say anything like that. And the credit I gave to McD is related to gaining and maintaining O zone time, which by the law of there's only one puck on the ice equates to less time spent in the D zone. I'm not even sure why he has to be a Selke candidate to be great at piling up O zone time.

2 - Except nobody said he should not get some credit. They said hey, let's not get crazy with the credit and add some perspective. Those are two different animals.

3 - Heh. Okay, man. You've conflated so much stuff that I don't even know how this relates to the original topic. And I've seen far too much of Makar to bother arguing over his play driving acumen. That's just kooky.

And just FYI...
Makar v Bouchard
1.33 Giveaways/60 2.49
2.23 Takeaways/60 1.67
1.19 Hits/60 2.11
4.39 Shot Blocks/60 3.49
0.76 D Zone Giveways/60 1.52

He's being carried by MacKinnon.
Mar. 28 at 2:31 p.m.
#20
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,266
Likes: 11,347
Quoting: CD282
He's being carried by MacKinnon.


tears of joy

Oh, man. Thanks for that. It's always good to chuckle.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll