SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Rockford Icehogs next season

Created by: Garak
Team: 2024-25 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 1, 2024
Published: Apr. 1, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I'm sure at least one or two guys from this year, like Seney, Gust, etc., will be back as well, and some of these guys won't sign for another year, and some of them won't sign at all. But, the Icehogs already look great and are gonna look even better then next few years.

"A winning culture starts in Rockford." -Abraham Lincoln
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$950,000
3$950,000
3$950,000
3$950,000
3$950,000
3$950,000
3$950,000
1$950,000
2$950,000
2$950,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$840,000
2$840,000
2$840,000
2$840,000
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the CHI
2025
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2026
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$87,700,000$70,874,584$0$6,672,500$16,825,416
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$896,667$896,667 (Performance Bonus$80,000$80K)
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$825,000$825,000 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$878,333$878,333 (Performance Bonus$80,000$80K)
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
C
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$895,000$895,000 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
C, LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
LW, C
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$931,667$931,667
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
RW
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
LW
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$896,250$896,250
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$859,167$859,167 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
C
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
C
RFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$840,000$840,000
LD
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$840,000$840,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$855,833$855,833 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$825,000$825,000 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$840,000$840,000
G
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$840,000$840,000
LD
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
G
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
RD
RFA
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$962,500$962,500
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$912,500$912,500 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 1 at 5:39 p.m.
#1
Rebuilding
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 431
Likes: 180
What would be the price for Colton Dach ?
Garak liked this.
Apr. 1 at 5:44 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 10,898
Likes: 10,693
Quoting: Habs_22_14_20
What would be the price for Colton Dach ?


You'd have to ask Kyle Davidson to get the correct answer. But if I were him, I wouldn't be interested in moving Dach without a haul coming back.
Habs_22_14_20 liked this.
Apr. 1 at 5:57 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 10,898
Likes: 10,693
Quoting: Habs_22_14_20
What would be the price for Colton Dach ?


Just for reference, In 2022, Pronman did a 2021 re-draft ranking and had Dach moving from there 62nd overall up to 38th. I think if Pronman did another "2021 re-draft" now, Dach would be going even earlier than that, somewhere in the mid to late 1st round.
Apr. 1 at 6:21 p.m.
#4
Rebuilding
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 431
Likes: 180
Quoting: Garak
Just for reference, In 2022, Pronman did a 2021 re-draft ranking and had Dach moving from there 62nd overall up to 38th. I think if Pronman did another "2021 re-draft" now, Dach would be going even earlier than that, somewhere in the mid to late 1st round.


I proposed Reichel vs Barron a couple days ago but Hawks fans wanted to bet on Reichel upside
What about a Colton Dach vs Justin Barron swap 1 for 1 ?
Garak liked this.
Apr. 1 at 6:48 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 10,898
Likes: 10,693
Quoting: Habs_22_14_20
I proposed Reichel vs Barron a couple days ago but Hawks fans wanted to bet on Reichel upside
What about a Colton Dach vs Justin Barron swap 1 for 1 ?


I would not do that. Barron is not worth what you seem to think he is. He is a borderline bust at this point and he will no longer be waiver exempt next season.
Snowhawk18 liked this.
Apr. 1 at 7:16 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 8,767
Likes: 10,649
Quoting: Habs_22_14_20
I proposed Reichel vs Barron a couple days ago but Hawks fans wanted to bet on Reichel upside
What about a Colton Dach vs Justin Barron swap 1 for 1 ?


I'd probably do the Reichel for Barron deal before Dach for Barron. I like Barron more than Garak does, but I'm not sure I'd pull the trigger on either trade. I think ultimately Reichel and Dach end up competing for the same roster spot - 3rd line LW - and Dach wins out. Just my two cents.
Habs_22_14_20 and Snowhawk18 liked this.
Apr. 1 at 7:20 p.m.
#7
Rebuilding
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 431
Likes: 180
Quoting: Garak
I would not do that. Barron is not worth what you seem to think he is. He is a borderline bust at this point and he will no longer be waiver exempt next season.


Quoting: Hawksguy81
I'd probably do the Reichel for Barron deal before Dach for Barron. I like Barron more than Garak does, but I'm not sure I'd pull the trigger on either trade. I think ultimately Reichel and Dach end up competing for the same roster spot - 3rd line LW - and Dach wins out. Just my two cents.


Barron played top 4 minutes in the NHL but he yet called a 22 yo bust when Dach is 21 yo with zero NHL games under the belt (when we know defenseman takes longer to develop)
The reason Barron is in the AHL is because of MTL depth on the blueline. That depth won't be gone next year, so I think another defenseman will get dealt, I just think Barron has more value than a Jordan Harris / Jayden Struble so he could return a good prospect back
Garak and Hawksguy81 liked this.
Apr. 1 at 7:21 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 8,767
Likes: 10,649
It really is a good looking group for the Icehogs next season. I see two of Seney, Gust, Philip or Bjork back as veteran forwards and a 3rd vet as the 7th D. Probably a couple of experienced guys on AHL deals for depth. Interested to see if Kyle goes after any undrafted free agents or if he just stands pat w/ his draft picks.
Habs_22_14_20 liked this.
Apr. 1 at 7:38 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 10,898
Likes: 10,693
Quoting: Habs_22_14_20
Barron played top 4 minutes in the NHL but he yet called a 22 yo bust when Dach is 21 yo with zero NHL games under the belt (when we know defenseman takes longer to develop)
The reason Barron is in the AHL is because of MTL depth on the blueline. That depth won't be gone next year, so I think another defenseman will get dealt, I just think Barron has more value than a Jordan Harris / Jayden Struble so he could return a good prospect back


I'm not trying to argue with you about this or be mean, I'm just telling you what I think. And I said "borderline bust" not a straight up bust. He has had plenty of opportunity with both COL and MTL and hasn't shown enough to even hang onto a roster spot. Even if he takes more time, he probably ends up a 3rd pairing dman. He is a pending RFA and is losing his waiver exemption after this season. Dach has been playing VERY well in his first pro season, he plays a desirable style, and he has two more seasons on his contract with waiver exemption. If CHI does go after Barron it WILL NOT be with players like Dach or Reichel. Maybe a mid round pick for his rights if MTL is ready to move on and CHI likes him. But I highly doubt we are moving Dach or Reichel any time soon unless it is for an overpay.
Hawksguy81 liked this.
Apr. 1 at 7:49 p.m.
#10
Rebuilding
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 431
Likes: 180
Quoting: Garak
I'm not trying to argue with you about this or be mean, I'm just telling you what I think. And I said "borderline bust" not a straight up bust. He has had plenty of opportunity with both COL and MTL and hasn't shown enough to even hang onto a roster spot. Even if he takes more time, he probably ends up a 3rd pairing dman. He is a pending RFA and is losing his waiver exemption after this season. Dach has been playing VERY well in his first pro season, he plays a desirable style, and he has two more seasons on his contract with waiver exemption. If CHI does go after Barron it WILL NOT be with players like Dach or Reichel. Maybe a mid round pick for his rights if MTL is ready to move on and CHI likes him. But I highly doubt we are moving Dach or Reichel any time soon unless it is for an overpay.


It's just a dumb thinking a mid round pick but whatever
I see a lot of posts from Habs fans so I'm used too it
And again you are not listening, he doesn't need more time, he could be a regular if it wasn't for our depth
He was 20 yo when he played 2 games for the Avs, of course he wasn't going to be a regular ...
Anyway, you can say : I wouldn't be interested in a Barron vs Reichel or Dach swap, instead of 'I would do a mid round pick for Barron'
Apr. 1 at 7:53 p.m.
#11
Maple
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 44
Likes: 37
I could see Roos head back to Sweden next year. He was fairly good in the 17 games he featured in with Chicago last season, but he's been stuck in RFD and he doesn't really have much of a pathway up to the Hawks at this point. I wouldn't mind bringing him back since I've seen him play his off side alongside the likes of Allan & Phillips and that itself it useful, but he'll probably want a lot more $ to play in the minors.
Scott Powers in one of his recent articles says the Hawks likely won't sign Basse unless some drastic happens.
I think Dominic James heads back to uni since he only played two games this season after a major shoulder injury. Unless Rockford can give him ample ice time in their top 9, I'm fine with him going back to Minnesota for a senior year.
With Marcel Marcel idk if getting reps with Indy next season or just sending back to the Czech Republic would be better for his development. Either way his ceiling is probably a 13F anyways.

But yeah Rockford on paper looks really good, and Anders Sorensen is a solid coach. Now its just improving from being good to being great.
Hawksguy81 and Garak liked this.
Apr. 1 at 8:22 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 10,898
Likes: 10,693
Quoting: Habs_22_14_20
It's just a dumb thinking a mid round pick but whatever
I see a lot of posts from Habs fans so I'm used too it
And again you are not listening, he doesn't need more time, he could be a regular if it wasn't for our depth
He was 20 yo when he played 2 games for the Avs, of course he wasn't going to be a regular ...
Anyway, you can say : I wouldn't be interested in a Barron vs Reichel or Dach swap, instead of 'I would do a mid round pick for Barron'


Well, it is an important distinction. I would give up a 3rd or maybe a late 2nd tops for Barron, but I would not sell Reichel or Dach for that little. Which means at an even swap, CHI would be leaving value on the table. Also, I am looking at MTL's depth, and if he is what you say he is, he shouldn't have a hard time keeping an NHL roster spot against Kovacevic, Struble, Xhekaj, Harris, or Guhle, imo. Also, I wouldn't call an average of 16:56 TOI "top 4 minutes".

Regardless, you glossed over the most important point I made. He is a pending RFA who will no longer be waiver exempt. That means MTL either has to re-sign him and chance losing him on waivers if he can't lock down a roster spot, or be forced to trade him. Why would CHI trade assets for him just to risk losing him on waivers? They would essentially be paying MTL to assume all the risk. That diminishes his value.

With Dach we have plenty of time before he will need waivers and he looks like he will be a much more important player at his ceiling than Barron. With Reichel we have no reason to move on from him and every reason to give him all the time he needs to put his game back together, unless someone is overpaying. Context and details are important in these discussions.
Apr. 1 at 8:53 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 10,898
Likes: 10,693
Quoting: Maple
I could see Roos head back to Sweden next year. He was fairly good in the 17 games he featured in with Chicago last season, but he's been stuck in RFD and he doesn't really have much of a pathway up to the Hawks at this point. I wouldn't mind bringing him back since I've seen him play his off side alongside the likes of Allan & Phillips and that itself it useful, but he'll probably want a lot more $ to play in the minors.
Scott Powers in one of his recent articles says the Hawks likely won't sign Basse unless some drastic happens.
I think Dominic James heads back to uni since he only played two games this season after a major shoulder injury. Unless Rockford can give him ample ice time in their top 9, I'm fine with him going back to Minnesota for a senior year.
With Marcel Marcel idk if getting reps with Indy next season or just sending back to the Czech Republic would be better for his development. Either way his ceiling is probably a 13F anyways.

But yeah Rockford on paper looks really good, and Anders Sorensen is a solid coach. Now its just improving from being good to being great.


Well, as I said in the description, I don't expect all of these contracts to be signed or all of these players to be in Rockford next year. And I also guarantee some of the veteran AHLers will be back next season on AHL/ECHL contracts.

Also, I really don't care what Powers says. I like the guy, but most of what he does is speculative, and most of his speculation is pretty bad. Half the time it seems like he doesn't even watch the kids play, like he is just parroting other writers and scouts. I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't sign Basse, but I don't see why they wouldn't sign him, either. He is only required a one year deal. Let him and Stauber battle for the spot behind Commesso, and stash the other in Indy. It's not like they couldn't afford to see what they got. They have the roster space if you include the ECHL.

I'm pretty sure Wall Maz (Chicago Prospects on Twitter) and Tiribassi watch more prospects than Powers does.
Maple liked this.
Apr. 1 at 9:01 p.m.
#14
Rebuilding
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 431
Likes: 180
Quoting: Garak
Well, it is an important distinction. I would give up a 3rd or maybe a late 2nd tops for Barron, but I would not sell Reichel or Dach for that little. Which means at an even swap, CHI would be leaving value on the table. Also, I am looking at MTL's depth, and if he is what you say he is, he shouldn't have a hard time keeping an NHL roster spot against Kovacevic, Struble, Xhekaj, Harris, or Guhle, imo. Also, I wouldn't call an average of 16:56 TOI "top 4 minutes".

Regardless, you glossed over the most important point I made. He is a pending RFA who will no longer be waiver exempt. That means MTL either has to re-sign him and chance losing him on waivers if he can't lock down a roster spot, or be forced to trade him. Why would CHI trade assets for him just to risk losing him on waivers? They would essentially be paying MTL to assume all the risk. That diminishes his value.

With Dach we have plenty of time before he will need waivers and he looks like he will be a much more important player at his ceiling than Barron. With Reichel we have no reason to move on from him and every reason to give him all the time he needs to put his game back together, unless someone is overpaying. Context and details are important in these discussions.


OMG it's like talking to some habs fans who don't know puck
Justin Barron will get a contract and have a roster spot in the NHL next season IF he is not traded this offseason. There's no 'risking losing him on waivers', he will play if not dealt. That simple. I think MTL would like to move a defenseman this offseason, either Barron, Harris or Struble. Maybe they all come back and they keep doing the rotation on the backend until injuries, but stop saying he doesn't hold a lot of value because he lose waiver exemption next year lol
Apr. 1 at 9:05 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 10,898
Likes: 10,693
Quoting: Habs_22_14_20
OMG it's like talking to some habs fans who don't know puck
Justin Barron will get a contract and have a roster spot in the NHL next season IF he is not traded this offseason. There's no 'risking losing him on waivers', he will play if not dealt. That simple. I think MTL would like to move a defenseman this offseason, either Barron, Harris or Struble. Maybe they all come back and they keep doing the rotation on the backend until injuries, but stop saying he doesn't hold a lot of value because he lose waiver exemption next year lol


Uh huh... Sure, bud. Take care.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll