SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The Best Avs ACGM

Created by: Anus_McLeod
Team: 2024-25 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 1, 2024
Published: Apr. 2, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Or perhaps the worst. Either way, counting on the FO to get good deals for both Mitts and Walker. Term can be adjusted if needed.

The goal is to get similar on ice performance but from cheaper personnel.
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$950,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$6,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$775,000
1$775,000
5$4,250,000
Trades
1.
2.
COL
  1. Laughton, Scott
Additional Details:
Does Colorado need to add? Straight up seems close to fair on the surface but not sure if Philly has the incentive to do this.
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the NSH
2025
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2026
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$87,700,000$87,692,917$0$57,500$7,083
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$12,600,000$12,600,000
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,250,000$9,250,000
RW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, C
RFA
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,125,000$6,125,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$896,250$896,250 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,050,000$1,050,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$847,500$847,500
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$845,000$845,000
C
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$7,250,000$7,250,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$766,667$766,667
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$837,500$837,500
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$950,000$950,000
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LD/RD
UFA
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$775,000$775,000
LD
UFA
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$850,000$850,000
RD
RFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$775,000$775,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW, LW
UFA

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 2 at 12:38 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 1,015
That Mittelstadt contract is optimistic even if the Avs can get a good deal.

Habs don't make that trade and Avs need to add to the Philly trade (or just replace Manson).
Anus_McLeod liked this.
Apr. 2 at 12:41 p.m.
#2
Habs 2010
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 975
That's a fair trade offer for Kovacevic (value wise), but I don't think MTL would really want Colton.
Anus_McLeod liked this.
Apr. 2 at 12:50 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,609
Likes: 4,584
You've disappointed me in that Monahan wasn't re-signed by MTL and traded to the Avs for their first round pick in 2026.

Not sure whether MTL would have interest in Colton but Kovacevic is definitely a guy the Avs should be looking at imo but I'd probably pass on the Manson for Laughton deal from the Avs PoV and keep Manson if possible and maybe give Trenin a shot at the 3C job (I like Walker but I'd rather keep Manson's nastiness and physicality over 'more of the same' in Walker and not sure JK has the nastiness of JM). Trenin hasn't really actually played that much at C though even if listed as one (or at least he hasn't taken many face offs which to me means he hasn't played C much) but then the same was true for Colton prior to this year. Yakov has definitely been the most impressive of the 'deadline' additions for me so far, and has a rep for taking other young Russians under his wing and might just have Kovalenko actually on his wing too.
Anus_McLeod and MeetYourMakar liked this.
Apr. 2 at 12:56 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,584
Likes: 3,444
Quoting: Shanesaw9
That's a fair trade offer for Kovacevic (value wise), but I don't think MTL would really want Colton.


I feel like Colton would make their bottom six better but also recognize they have a lot of forwards when healthy. I could see it happening if they also moved, say Evans.

Ultimately the Avs could move Colton for a pick and make a different offer for Kovacevic, but I went this route for the sake of simplicity.
TJTwolf and Shanesaw9 liked this.
Apr. 2 at 12:58 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,584
Likes: 3,444
Edited Apr. 2 at 1:04 p.m.
Quoting: TJTwolf
You've disappointed me in that Monahan wasn't re-signed by MTL and traded to the Avs for their first round pick in 2026.

Not sure whether MTL would have interest in Colton but Kovacevic is definitely a guy the Avs should be looking at imo but I'd probably pass on the Manson for Laughton deal from the Avs PoV and keep Manson if possible and maybe give Trenin a shot at the 3C job (I like Walker but I'd rather keep Manson's nastiness and physicality over 'more of the same' in Walker and not sure JK has the nastiness of JM). Trenin hasn't really actually played that much at C though even if listed as one (or at least he hasn't taken many face offs which to me means he hasn't played C much) but then the same was true for Colton prior to this year. Yakov has definitely been the most impressive of the 'deadline' additions for me so far, and has a rep for taking other young Russians under his wing and might just have Kovalenko actually on his wing too.


I think the team needs Walker more than you do. If Kovacevic can be Manson lite, then I think that's enough. Basically it comes down to if Manson + Malinski > Kovacevic + Walker. Close call but I like the latter, and especially if Walker comes on a good deal.

Edit: Fair point about 3C. There are other options, one of which could be Trenin. Maybe even Kovalenko, although it's tough to say considering he hasn't played a single game yet.
TJTwolf liked this.
Apr. 2 at 1:18 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2023
Posts: 182
Likes: 99
Quite sure Flyers would decline. They value Laughton 1st+ (may it be realistic or not), and Manson wouldn't get that kinda return. And also don't think they want add another injury prone D, they have had more than enough injuries with D already.
Anus_McLeod liked this.
Apr. 2 at 1:22 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,609
Likes: 4,584
Quoting: Anus_McLeod
I think the team needs Walker more than you do. If Kovacevic can be Manson lite, then I think that's enough. Basically it comes down to if Manson + Malinski > Kovacevic + Walker. Close call but I like the latter, and especially if Walker comes on a good deal.

Edit: Fair point about 3C. There are other options, one of which could be Trenin. Maybe even Kovalenko, although it's tough to say considering he hasn't played a single game yet.


For me it's very much in the mix as to who is best to keep and who isn't. I have my favourites to keep, let go or trade but even then I can see the arguments for and against others. It's something of a headache but arguably a nice one to have for CMac & Joe. There's arguments to be made for keeping, trading or letting go any of a number of guys. I think playoff performance will be a key (and possibly determining) factor for both the various individuals and the team as much as potential returns in trades and potential internal replacements. My thinking is Manson & Kovacevic btw, a mix of the two options you give (with Malinski rotating in from the scratches). Personally if it weren't for the age factor I'd probably move Girard to keep Walker even though Walker is a righty as he can play left D as well. Girard also probably gives the best return in a trade for re-stocking. A lot of factors to consider.
Anus_McLeod and MeetYourMakar liked this.
Apr. 2 at 2:33 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,584
Likes: 3,444
Quoting: Ujeje
Quite sure Flyers would decline. They value Laughton 1st+ (may it be realistic or not), and Manson wouldn't get that kinda return. And also don't think they want add another injury prone D, they have had more than enough injuries with D already.


I do think they could use Manson but also suspect you're right about them valuing Laughton very highly (likely too highly). Maybe I'll change the next one to futures for Manson.
TJTwolf liked this.
Apr. 2 at 2:40 p.m.
#9
Leaf Fan Joke Here
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 346
Likes: 107
colorado gonna retain 50%?

Good 4-6 D on min deal for a 3rd line center on a massive cap hit with term
Apr. 2 at 4:03 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,584
Likes: 3,444
Quoting: HabsAreSus
colorado gonna retain 50%?

Good 4-6 D on min deal for a 3rd line center on a massive cap hit with term


Colton's cap hit is fine for what he brings. Maybe a little steep but not a lot. Heck, Dvorak makes more than him, and Habs fans wanted a lot to move him back when he was healthy.

I'd happily keep Colton if it weren't necessary to find cap somewhere. To me both teams get a piece they can use in the trade.
Apr. 2 at 4:39 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2023
Posts: 182
Likes: 99
Quoting: Anus_McLeod
I do think they could use Manson but also suspect you're right about them valuing Laughton very highly (likely too highly). Maybe I'll change the next one to futures for Manson.


I think timing ain't right for them to acquire Manson unless they move Ristolainen. Or at least in my opinion they shouldn't trade for him unless they get something to help them in future as well.
Anus_McLeod liked this.
Apr. 2 at 5:27 p.m.
#12
Prime Primeau
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 5,470
Likes: 2,173
Hum, yes. Where do we sign up?
Anus_McLeod liked this.
Apr. 3 at 7:55 a.m.
#13
Habs 2010
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 975
Quoting: Anus_McLeod
I feel like Colton would make their bottom six better but also recognize they have a lot of forwards when healthy. I could see it happening if they also moved, say Evans.

Ultimately the Avs could move Colton for a pick and make a different offer for Kovacevic, but I went this route for the sake of simplicity.


Colton for sure would be an improvement to their current bottom 6, however I'm hoping for bigger things from the habs this offseason. A reunion with Monahan on the 3rd line would be ideal IMO.

They have lots of cap space and defenseman / draft picks to make a big splash this offseason potentially.
Anus_McLeod liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll