SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Bruins Post Marchand

Created by: Hockey_Hippy
Team: 2025-26 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 5, 2024
Published: Apr. 5, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,100,000
3$3,000,000
2$800,000
3$5,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$5,500,000
3$1,500,000
3$5,500,000
3$3,000,000
2$1,000,000
2$1,400,000
3$4,000,000
2$2,000,000
Trades
BOS
  1. Dubois, Pierre-Luc
  2. Portillo, Erik [RFA Rights]
  3. Ziemmer, Koehn
  4. 2026 1st round pick (LAK)
Additional Details:
LA gets their goalie for their Window of Contention without giving up any of their young roster studs (Byfield, Kailev, LaFerriere, Clarke)
LAK
  1. Swayman, Jeremy
Additional Details:
Boston deals from a position of strength by re-signing Ullmark and then re-trenching between the pipes, sending out the more proven Swayman, but getting back a young stud in Portillo, adding a pair of assets to the pipeline in LA's 1st and Ziemmer. They also have to take PLD at full freight but he is not coming to Beantown as a potential saviour which might be a good thing. After all, it worked for Zacha.
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2025
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2026
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$92,000,000$82,270,000$0$80,000$9,730,000
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
UFA
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,750,000$4,750,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$11,250,000$11,250,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$870,000$870,000 (Performance Bonus$80,000$80K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C, RW
RFA
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW
UFA
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA
$1,400,000$1,400,000
C, RW
UFA
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$800,000$800,000
LW, RW
RFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD
NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,500,000$5,500,000
G
UFA
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
UFA
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LD
RFA
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 5 at 9:22 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 1,373
Likes: 795
LA wins since they no longer have to have PLD. I also imagine PLD blocks a move to Boston
Apr. 5 at 9:22 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 28,072
Likes: 14,672
Holy crap. Why the eff would Boston do that
trademaster20 liked this.
Apr. 5 at 10:21 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2023
Posts: 505
Likes: 334
Yeah I want Boston to avoid PLD like the plague. He's been a problem on 3 out of 3 teams he's played for and he's only been in the league since 2017. And his contract is terrible
Apr. 5 at 11:12 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 4,241
Likes: 1,340
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Holy crap. Why the eff would Boston do that


They wouldn’t even consider it.
Apr. 5 at 11:13 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,955
Likes: 8,907
Jesus no. PLD is 🗑️
Apr. 6 at 11:34 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 356
Likes: 32
Quoting: SJSF
Yeah I want Boston to avoid PLD like the plague. He's been a problem on 3 out of 3 teams he's played for and he's only been in the league since 2017. And his contract is terrible


Take a look at two of the three teams PLD has played for, Columbus and Winnipeg. Both of those teams were leadership weak sides. LA he is in his first year there and it is rather transitionary. Kopitar and Doughty are the big two but they are getting old and who is coming up behind them? There is a bit of a void there. Boston on the other hand, say whatever you want about them, they have a solid dressing room culture and have for years. To me, they are the *one* team I think that could turn PLD and I'm a Leaf guy, not a Bruins guy. Even after Chara and Recchi, there was Bergeron and Marchand, and after them it will be Pastrnak and McAvoy and now Zacha. And everyone crowds in behind them.

Again, remember Zacha was an underachieving big man as well in New Jersey. Coyle was the same on multiple teams too. Boston made it work. If there is one thing I want the Leafs to take from the Bruins it is that.

Why Swayman and not Ullmark? Because Swayman has a lot more value and the Bruins need pipeline assets badly. Portillo is seen as a future stud and Ziemmer is your typical big bodied Bruin power forward in training wheels. Plus you are adding another 1st.

That's my reasoning.
Apr. 6 at 11:40 a.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 356
Likes: 32
Quoting: FoxYou727
LA wins since they no longer have to have PLD. I also imagine PLD blocks a move to Boston


PLD is mired on the third line in LA. If in two years he is still there because Byfield is the #1 and Kopitar the #2, he may change his mind.
Apr. 6 at 12:26 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2023
Posts: 505
Likes: 334
Quoting: Hockey_Hippy
Take a look at two of the three teams PLD has played for, Columbus and Winnipeg. Both of those teams were leadership weak sides. LA he is in his first year there and it is rather transitionary. Kopitar and Doughty are the big two but they are getting old and who is coming up behind them? There is a bit of a void there. Boston on the other hand, say whatever you want about them, they have a solid dressing room culture and have for years. To me, they are the *one* team I think that could turn PLD and I'm a Leaf guy, not a Bruins guy. Even after Chara and Recchi, there was Bergeron and Marchand, and after them it will be Pastrnak and McAvoy and now Zacha. And everyone crowds in behind them.

Again, remember Zacha was an underachieving big man as well in New Jersey. Coyle was the same on multiple teams too. Boston made it work. If there is one thing I want the Leafs to take from the Bruins it is that.

Why Swayman and not Ullmark? Because Swayman has a lot more value and the Bruins need pipeline assets badly. Portillo is seen as a future stud and Ziemmer is your typical big bodied Bruin power forward in training wheels. Plus you are adding another 1st.

That's my reasoning.


I don't remember Zacha having an attitude or effort issue in Jersey. And Coyle was an instant locker room/high character guy from the moment he landed in Boston. I also agree that Winnipeg and Columbus weren't ideal situations (although CBJ was good for a couple years while he was there and he still dragged his ass playing for Torts). My question is why should Boston risk him being a project they have to expend effort correcting when they could just bring in players who doesn't have the alleged attitude problem and who in 99% of cases are on better contracts? I think part of what keeps Boston's culture strong is who they choose to bring in. Guys like Backes or Foligno weren't great value pickups (although Fliggy was a dog on their 4th line last year) but they were true leaders who instantly added to the leadership group.

PLD at 8.5 HAS to be their 1C, which he hasn't been able to do in his career yet. Some of that has to do with who has been in front of him but I don't like his odds of making that leap at this point.

If they trade either goalie, it should be for futures or prospects they can choose to keep or use to acquire a player. Going player for player with a goalie isn't going to get them value because the position is so undervalued on the market.

They seem to have indicated pretty clearly that Swayman is their guy going forward, based on what happened at the deadline. They don't need more goaltending prospects. They have Bussi and Dipietro both looking to take on a backup role, and Reid Dyck playing well in Junior.

As far as the forward prospect, I don't see anything looking him up that indicates he'll be a big boost to the pipeline. They've already shown how off those forecasters can be at evaluating talent with Beecher and Lohrei both taking massive steps and becoming full time NHLers this year. Guys like Merkulov, Lysell, Jellvik and Farinacci will all be pushing to take spots next year, and Pelosi and Hendrickson in the USHL are garnering a lot of attention as really good depth pickups in recent drafts.

The other thing is that they are most definitely not signing Forbort at more than he currently makes. He struggled tremendously after coming back from injury this year and was already overpaid at 3 million. There probably won't even be room for him if he were to take a 1 mil. AAV deal with how Wotherspoon has filled in on the third pair.

Overall the idea of moving Swayman (although most Bs fans hate it) could get them a long-term solution at C, but I really don't think PLD is a wise choice
Apr. 6 at 1:11 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 356
Likes: 32
Quoting: SJSF
I don't remember Zacha having an attitude or effort issue in Jersey. And Coyle was an instant locker room/high character guy from the moment he landed in Boston. I also agree that Winnipeg and Columbus weren't ideal situations (although CBJ was good for a couple years while he was there and he still dragged his ass playing for Torts). My question is why should Boston risk him being a project they have to expend effort correcting when they could just bring in players who doesn't have the alleged attitude problem and who in 99% of cases are on better contracts? I think part of what keeps Boston's culture strong is who they choose to bring in. Guys like Backes or Foligno weren't great value pickups (although Fliggy was a dog on their 4th line last year) but they were true leaders who instantly added to the leadership group.

PLD at 8.5 HAS to be their 1C, which he hasn't been able to do in his career yet. Some of that has to do with who has been in front of him but I don't like his odds of making that leap at this point.


Both Zacha and Coyle underachieved where they had been prior to Boston. Both had been drafted to be #1 centers and both failed in that regard. In this scenario I am not expecting PLD to be a #1 center. I do not even have him in the middle. I also agree with you on Coyle and for that matter your middle pairing on D. It is *because of this* I think they can take that chance, similar to what Colorado did with Kadri. He had a checkered past in Toronto, but the Avs surrounded him with types who would keep him in line and he prospered.

[quote=SJSF;4816601If they trade either goalie, it should be for futures or prospects they can choose to keep or use to acquire a player. Going player for player with a goalie isn't going to get them value because the position is so undervalued on the market.

They seem to have indicated pretty clearly that Swayman is their guy going forward, based on what happened at the deadline. They don't need more goaltending prospects. They have Bussi and Dipietro both looking to take on a backup role, and Reid Dyck playing well in Junior.[/quote]

So I'm not seeing either Bussi or DiPietro as someone whom you groom to be a starter and Dyck just turned 20, so he is three years away assuming he keeps progressing. Portillo is about a year away and has a 7 year track record of blowing up shooters at all levels. He dovetails nicely with Ullmark's inevitable fade as he ages out.

[quote=SJSF;4816601As far as the forward prospect, I don't see anything looking him up that indicates he'll be a big boost to the pipeline. They've already shown how off those forecasters can be at evaluating talent with Beecher and Lohrei both taking massive steps and becoming full time NHLers this year. Guys like Merkulov, Lysell, Jellvik and Farinacci will all be pushing to take spots next year, and Pelosi and Hendrickson in the USHL are garnering a lot of attention as really good depth pickups in recent drafts.[/quote]

Of the last four you are counting on the heaviest of the first three is 181 pounds. Frankly I think Farinacci is a year away assuming he keeps progressing and I'd like to see what Jellvik does away from that uber talented BC team before making a final call on him. Ziemmer is well over 6'0 and over 200 pounds and had 89 points in 68 games in his draft year. He is what your pipeline lacks. Size that can score. And he is younger than all of them.

[quote=SJSF;4816601The other thing is that they are most definitely not signing Forbort at more than he currently makes. He struggled tremendously after coming back from injury this year and was already overpaid at 3 million. There probably won't even be room for him if he were to take a 1 mil. AAV deal with how Wotherspoon has filled in on the third pair.[/quote]

That's the way of the world. I admit, I am not as knowledgeable on the depths of the Bruins D as you probably are.

[quote=SJSF;4816601Overall the idea of moving Swayman (although most Bs fans hate it) could get them a long-term solution at C, but I really don't think PLD is a wise choice[/quote]

I'm not looking at PLD for that. He is a lottery ticket, albeit, I'm betting one with a decent chance of winning given the Bruin's culture. The real value in the deal is the two prospects and the 1st. My guess is you do not get that alone for Swayman without taking PLD's ticket. Those are some very highly thought of assets. And it is not like the Kings have no idea how to draft and develop forwards.
SJSF liked this.
Apr. 6 at 1:30 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2023
Posts: 505
Likes: 334
So I'm not seeing either Bussi or DiPietro as someone whom you groom to be a starter and Dyck just turned 20, so he is three years away assuming he keeps progressing. Portillo is about a year away and has a 7 year track record of blowing up shooters at all levels. He dovetails nicely with Ullmark's inevitable fade as he ages out.

If Sway were to move, then you're totally right that having a good goalie prospect coming back to eventually take over for Ullmark would make sense.
Hockey_Hippy liked this.
Apr. 7 at 12:33 p.m.
#11
BostonBoy17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 662
Likes: 204
You are the 2nd guy I see giving Derek Forbort a contract extension and a raise... what game do you people watch? Wotherspoon is cheaper and better, Forbort is GONE. Heinen gets more, PLD is a cancer, Swayman should only be moved for a stud and PLD is not one, you're not putting Poitras on the wing, and we already have 2 AHL goalies who can backup just as well as Allen who commands way more money.
Apr. 7 at 5:53 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 356
Likes: 32
Quoting: beantownboy17
You are the 2nd guy I see giving Derek Forbort a contract extension and a raise... what game do you people watch? Wotherspoon is cheaper and better, Forbort is GONE. Heinen gets more, PLD is a cancer, Swayman should only be moved for a stud and PLD is not one, you're not putting Poitras on the wing, and we already have 2 AHL goalies who can backup just as well as Allen who commands way more money.


I've already admitted that I am not up on the depths of Boston's blueline as much as some folks. Forbort/Wotherspoon is really not a thing for me. I'm fine either way.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll