SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

How much for Guhle extension

Created by: Wreckless
Team: 2025-26 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 28, 2024
Published: Apr. 28, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
For Guhle, the Jamie Drysdale bridge plus $6mm his last RFA year and $7.25mm for each of 4 UFA years could work for both sides giving the player long term financial security and the team cap flexibility to compete for cups in the short and medium term. $2.3mm x 3 + $6mm + $7.25mm x 4 = $41.9mm / 8 = $5.2375mm cap hit. Gets a massive payday again as a 30 yo UFA entering peak years for defensemen.
Slafkovsky 4 year RFA deal in the mold of Dach and Newhook, still RFA at expiry, and lower cap hit gives us flexibility to add top line UFAs and compete for cups in the short term.
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$885,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$1,100,000
2$989,750
2$818,750
4$4,189,750
8$5,237,500
4$2,900,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$8,700,000
7$8,500,000
1$3,500,000
4$2,050,000
1$3,400,000
1$8,500,000
Trades
MTL
  1. Holtz, Alexander [RFA Rights]
  2. Nemec, Simon
Additional Details:
Plus whatever draft pick
NJD
  1. Caufield, Cole
  2. Reinbacher, David
Additional Details:
Plus whatever draft pick
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the COL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the WSH
2025
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the DET
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
2026
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$87,700,000$85,611,583$0$4,100,000$2,088,417
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$8,500,000$8,500,000
LW, RW
UFA
$8,700,000$8,700,000
C
UFA
$8,500,000$8,500,000
LW, C
UFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,189,750$4,189,750
RW, LW
RFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,875,000$7,875,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,362,500$3,362,500
C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,900,000$2,900,000
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,400,000$3,400,000
RW, LW
UFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,050,000$2,050,000
C
UFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$818,750$818,750
RW, LW
RFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$835,000$835,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$885,000$885,000
C
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,875,000$4,875,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$3,250,000$3M)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,150,000$3,150,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,237,500$5,237,500
LD/RD
RFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$875,000$875,000
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,100,000$1,100,000
G
RFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$989,750$989,750
LD/RD
RFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
UFA
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$10,500,000$10,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 1
$2,900,000$2,900,000
RW, LW
RFA

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 28 at 4:28 p.m.
#1
SkateOrDie
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 2,664
Likes: 430
insulting crosby is surely a way to get him to come play for MTL
jonh514 liked this.
Apr. 28 at 4:30 p.m.
#2
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 43,772
Likes: 24,491
Guhle gets the K’Andre bridge
Apr. 28 at 4:30 p.m.
#3
HuGo is a Boss GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 7,128
Likes: 3,109
That Caufield/Holtz deal makes me cringe.
A_Habs_fan and Just_A_Guess liked this.
Apr. 28 at 4:40 p.m.
#4
SHL NJD GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 12,803
Likes: 17,424
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
insulting crosby is surely a way to get him to come play for MTL


Weirdly enough, Crosby had always had a cap hit of 8.7mil (excluding his ELC), even when the cap went up he extended in Pittsburgh for the exact same cap hit he had before
Apr. 28 at 4:54 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,988
Likes: 18,651
Devils would never trade Nemec for a winger.
Apr. 28 at 5:08 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 477
no more than Alex Vlasic on a long term deal
Apr. 28 at 5:10 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 4,997
Likes: 3,306
8x6-6.5.
Apr. 28 at 6:05 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Wreckless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 3,407
Likes: 445
Quoting: csick
Guhle gets the K’Andre bridge


No chance. Guhle will be 1 year younger coming out of ELC than K Andre was after ELC coming from the US college system.
And K Andre just came off a 9 goal 43 point season when he signed that.
It’s a good example you give though making clear a 2 year bridge would be significantly less than that. Drysdale was taken 6th overall same draft year as Guhle. Similar total stats. It’s the best comp, but with the Vlasic deal in Chicago, I think both sides will now opt for long term.
Apr. 28 at 6:07 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Wreckless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 3,407
Likes: 445
Quoting: GoHabsGo99
no more than Alex Vlasic on a long term deal


Comparable players. A 6 year term could also work. But my gut tells me it’s either gonna be a 2-3 year bridge, or max term 8 years. We’ll see though.
Apr. 28 at 6:12 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Wreckless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 3,407
Likes: 445
Quoting: Just_A_Guess
8x6-6.5.


How would you break it down, and which comps are you using?
Apr. 28 at 8:14 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 170
Yes love how the Devils keep getting smaller instead of size nice job
Apr. 28 at 8:30 p.m.
#12
OldSLIMEfan
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 224
Likes: 78
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
insulting crosby is surely a way to get him to come play for MTL


Shanascam would offer less out of spite.
Apr. 28 at 10:25 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 4,997
Likes: 3,306
Quoting: Wreckless
How would you break it down, and which comps are you using?


All honesty, I'm not really using comps. I see your assessment and it's realistic and would be a reasonable contract I would assume.

I feel like 5.2 wouldn't be enough for Guhle to sign 8 years, if that's all KH offers Guhle may opt to sign a bridge in order to cash in more in ~3 years. He's 22 and playing top line minutes comfortably, he'll command more imo. 6-6.5 is simply just what I expect to get him to take the 8 years after his performances thus far.
Apr. 29 at 10:57 a.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Wreckless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 3,407
Likes: 445
Quoting: Just_A_Guess
All honesty, I'm not really using comps. I see your assessment and it's realistic and would be a reasonable contract I would assume.

I feel like 5.2 wouldn't be enough for Guhle to sign 8 years, if that's all KH offers Guhle may opt to sign a bridge in order to cash in more in ~3 years. He's 22 and playing top line minutes comfortably, he'll command more imo. 6-6.5 is simply just what I expect to get him to take the 8 years after his performances thus far.


I hear you, but what he can « command » vs. what’s in the shared best interest of both him and the team is something else.
I think Hughes’ best approach would be to offer the 8 years (one year early this offseason) I pitched above and to hold firm.
Guhle knows there’s the possibility of his usage going down with Xhekaj being healthy, Hutson and Mailloux coming along, and guys like Harris, Struble, etc. on the left side pushing for minutes.
A long term deal guarantees his minutes and being the core defenseman who the team will focus on developing first.
Plus the possibility of getting injured is always a real risk.
If he doesn’t extend long term, Guhle might have to wait a year, and only be offered the Drysdale bridge. Whether his agent likes it or not, it’s the most relevant comp.
If they totally balk at the 8 year term, we definitely can’t hold their feet to the fire, but in that case, as mentioned above, I think we offer him the same 6 year deal Chicago gave to Vlasic and no more. There’s no way a 6 handle for a cap hit makes sense on any level.
If any of our other young D significantly outperform him, it still leaves room to compensate everyone this way.
Plus the cost of the first 2-3 years out of ELC is critical to be properly established right now.


Quoting: GoHabsGo99
no more than Alex Vlasic on a long term deal
Apr. 29 at 11:04 a.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Wreckless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 3,407
Likes: 445
Quoting: TyeZerker
Yes love how the Devils keep getting smaller instead of size nice job


🤦‍♂️

I just proposed the Devils adding 2 inches and 30 pounds at D with the 5th overall pick from 2023.
And reuniting the most potent duo from USNDP history.

We’ll gladly take Mercer instead though if you want to keep Holtz cuz he’s bigger…

Some people just like to complain.
Apr. 29 at 11:42 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 4,997
Likes: 3,306
Quoting: Wreckless
I hear you, but what he can « command » vs. what’s in the shared best interest of both him and the team is something else.
I think Hughes’ best approach would be to offer the 8 years (one year early this offseason) I pitched above and to hold firm.
Guhle knows there’s the possibility of his usage going down with Xhekaj being healthy, Hutson and Mailloux coming along, and guys like Harris, Struble, etc. on the left side pushing for minutes.
A long term deal guarantees his minutes and being the core defenseman who the team will focus on developing first.
Plus the possibility of getting injured is always a real risk.
If he doesn’t extend long term, Guhle might have to wait a year, and only be offered the Drysdale bridge. Whether his agent likes it or not, it’s the most relevant comp.
If they totally balk at the 8 year term, we definitely can’t hold their feet to the fire, but in that case, as mentioned above, I think we offer him the same 6 year deal Chicago gave to Vlasic and no more. There’s no way a 6 handle for a cap hit makes sense on any level.
If any of our other young D significantly outperform him, it still leaves room to compensate everyone this way.
Plus the cost of the first 2-3 years out of ELC is critical to be properly established right now.


I suppose we'll find out soon enough. I can't say I agree with you that a 6 doesn't make sense though. I'd be pleased with an 8yr x 6mil deal for the guy so if you're correct on what you've proposed then we save a little bit of money. I don't really think it's necessary to play hardball with him over 800k/yr when we have the space and it fits within the cap structure KH has set up via the Suzuki/Caufield deals. Imo he is and, will continue to be, our best well-rounded LHD. Hutson will be flashier and Xhekaj will be more physical, but Guhle will be the most reliable.
Apr. 29 at 11:47 a.m.
#17
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 12,351
Likes: 3,296
Quoting: Wreckless
🤦‍♂️

I just proposed the Devils adding 2 inches and 30 pounds at D with the 5th overall pick from 2023.
And reuniting the most potent duo from USNDP history.

We’ll gladly take Mercer instead though if you want to keep Holtz cuz he’s bigger…

Some people just like to complain.


Ignore him. NJD wouldn't do this because Nemec is him, but he'll get upset about "not adding enough size" no matter who you include.

I've seen him complain about not enough size after I added 4 guys who average 6 foot 3. If it's not Kevin Bahl or Nikita Zadorov, he hates it.
Wreckless liked this.
Apr. 29 at 12:24 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Wreckless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 3,407
Likes: 445
Quoting: Just_A_Guess
I suppose we'll find out soon enough. I can't say I agree with you that a 6 doesn't make sense though. I'd be pleased with an 8yr x 6mil deal for the guy so if you're correct on what you've proposed then we save a little bit of money. I don't really think it's necessary to play hardball with him over 800k/yr when we have the space and it fits within the cap structure KH has set up via the Suzuki/Caufield deals. Imo he is and, will continue to be, our best well-rounded LHD. Hutson will be flashier and Xhekaj will be more physical, but Guhle will be the most reliable.


Purely looking at today it would make sense, but we gotta think of this for the long term. I agree that Guhle projects to be a solid and reliable D, but how much offense will be there long term is still an open question, and those are the guys who command top dollar. There’s an abundance of reliable D in the 3-5mm range. I’d be willing to pay above that because I believe the offensive potential could be there, and he’s a quality human, but you can only pay so much for potential before it starts getting you in trouble.
We don’t know what Hutson might be in 2-3 years. He could be pushing close to a Quinn Hughes type, but he could also be in the Bergeron/Wisniewski/Streit mold. It’s way to early to speculate.
And either of Mailloux, Reinbacher, or maybe even both could possibly end up being more valuable than Guhle long term. They need multiple full seasons in the NHL before we can judge, they’re both still ridiculously young. The COVID year threw a real wrench into properly evaluating the development of these young players, especially critical at D.

My guess is the Vlasic deal gets done this offseason for 6 years. But I’d hope for the 8 I proposed above instead.

I agree Xhekaj gets significantly less in all scenarios, but he’s also on my ideal team for the long haul.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll